Iran has sentenced Nobel laureate Narges Mohammadi to another seven years in jail. Mohammadi is reportedly on hunger strike following the conviction. According to the Guardian, Mohammadi's lawyer Mostafa Nili has been in touch with her.

He said:

She has been sentenced to six years in prison for 'gathering and collusion' and one and a half years for propaganda and two-year travel ban.

The paper added:

She had been arrested in December at a memorial ceremony honouring Khosrow Alikordi, a 46-year-old Iranian lawyer and human rights advocate who had been based in Mashhad. Footage from the demonstration showed her shouting, demanding justice for Alikordi and others.

Iran has been rocked by near-revolution since December. Protests which began among small businesses over living costs were reportedly brutally repressed. Figures of dead and wounded are hard to verify due to state-enforced media and internet blackouts. Some estimates put the killed and injured in the tens of thousands.

The blackout also makes claims about the degree of US and Israel involvement difficult to corroborate. Despite this - or as a result - conspiracy and rumour have proliferated.

The new sentence comes as the US and Iran prepare to negotiate over Iran's nuclear programme. US President Donald Trump has deployed a US navy armada to the region.

Iran and the US will meet in Oman. Iran's top security official Ali Larijani visited Muscat ahead of the talks. Anadolu Agency said:

The indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington were halted following the 12-day war between Iran and Israel in June last year, during which the US targeted three key Iranian nuclear sites.

Adding:

While Iranian media have not specified the agenda of Larijani's visit, sources said he is expected to discuss the contours of the next round of talks with the Omani mediators.

The Nobel Committee condemned Mohammadi's arrest on 12 December 2025:

The Norwegian Nobel Committee calls on the Iranian authorities to immediately clarify Mohammadi's whereabouts, ensure her safety and integrity, and to release her without conditions. The Committee stands in solidarity with Narges Mohammadi and all those in Iran who work peacefully for human rights, the rule of law, and freedom of expression.

They appeared to suggest there was a link between Mohammadi's arrest and the award of a Nobel to pro-US Venezuelan figure Maria Corina Machado:

Given the close collaboration between the regimes in Iran and Venezuela, the Norwegian Nobel Committee notes that Ms. Mohammadi is arrested just as the Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to the Venezuelan opposition leader, Maria Corina Machado.

They offered nothing further to verify this specific claim.

Mohammadi had been temporarily released on a medical furlough from jail when she was re-arrested. She had been serving a 13 year sentence for:

charges of collusion against state security and propaganda against Iran's government.

During the recent protests Mohammadi:

kept up her activism with public protests and international media appearances, including even demonstrating at one point in front of Tehran's notorious Evin prison, where she had been held.

Mohammadi has reportedly had multiple heart attacks in jail. Her doctors fear she may also have cancer. This is why she was on medical furlough from her previous sentence. Now she appears to have been returned to prison. And at the precise moment the Iranian government is looking to avert internal crises and head off a threat of regime change.

The implications of this crunch moment for Mohammadi may be dire.

Featured image via the Canary

By Joe Glenton

Matt Goodwin is facing even more scorn, this time for attacking women. In a 2023 blog post unearthed by the Independent, the Reform candidate for Gorton and Denton proposed that people who don't have children should be taxed extra. What's worse, this was specifically meant as a punishment.

On his Substack, Goodwin said:

British family is imploding.

He went on to say that:

The collapse of the family has not only become unavoidable but is having very real and very negative effects on the country around us.

His solution to this was a raft of proposals that would create "a pro-family culture". These would include a national day to celebrate families and getting the king to send a telegram to families when they have a third child. For some fucking reason.

He also wanted "the importance of the family" to be represented in the school curriculum. This was alongside making sure British families were "prioritised" in the building of new houses. He also wanted to remove income tax for women with two or more children, presumably because he sees them as having done their duty.

Most bizarre of all was his proposal on child benefits:

Switching child benefit to incentivise families to have more children.

Which is hilarious when Reform is so opposed to lifting the two-child cap. Though not if you ask the two Reform MPs who accidentally voted for it.

But then came his plan to not only push reproduction but to punish those who don't have children:

 Introducing a 'negative child benefit' tax for those who don't have offspring

More worryingly, is that Reform agrees with him. A Reform spokesperson told the Huffington Post:

This is an idea that was first suggested by the respected demographer Paul Moreland as part of a range of measures that should be debated and discussed across developed nations if we are serious about dealing with our looming demography crisis.

He continued:

The Labour government has got its head in the sand when it comes to thinking about the long-term challenges facing Britain. We need a grown up, mature debate about how we can encourage people to have more children and support British families.

Of course, Goodwin as short-sighted as ever. Many could potentially be pressured into having kids and trapped in abusive relationships. It would mean that women are seen as only baby machines and not free to have their own lives or careers.

Deputy leader of Labour, Lucy Powell, expressed her disgust at this idea in the Independent:

Matthew Goodwin's big idea is so ludicrous, you'd be forgiven for thinking this is something out of The Handmaid's Tale. It would punish millions of women and strip them of their basic dignity to choose.

But that's only the ones that physically can have children.

I can't imagine the pain that this would cause to those who are struggling with fertility. On top of the emotional and physical toll this puts on you will be financial pressures. For those of us who are infertile, it sends one message. You are not good enough and deserve to be punished for failing as a woman.

I had an elective hysterectomy in 2017 after over a decade of pain. I chose my own health over a condition that was making me want to die, for the sake of one day having a baby. Many would call my decision selfish, but I frankly don't give a fuck what people who would rather I were in pain think of me.

As much as I loathe a Handmaid's Tale comparison, this is very apt here. In the novel, working-class women who are infertile are cast out of society. As they have no purpose in a society that values families over all else.

Goodwin's comments are abhorrently cruel and show just how much society hates people who don't have children. But Reform supporting it is a sign of just how much Christian pro-life values are not so quietly creeping into the UK.

By seeing us as just baby machines, we are telling anyone who can't have a baby, or chooses not to, that they do not belong in society. But Reform is also telling voters plainly that they don't actually give a fuck about women. Plainly put Reform will be dangerous for women, and they're already proudly telling us that.

Featured image via the Canary

By Rachel Charlton-Dailey

Bad Bunny just shook the US with his Super Bowl halftime show. And perhaps the most beautiful moment was when fellow Puerto Rican superstar Ricky Martin sang about US colonialism in Hawaii and Puerto Rico. This was especially poignant because of escalating US terror against Cuba right now.

Puerto Rico is a US territory that has been denied full democratic rights. And Bad Bunny speaks to the island's resistance during many years of financial crisis. His song Lo que le pasó a Hawaii ('What happened to Hawaii') expresses a desire that the US doesn't do to Puerto Rico what it has done to Hawaii.

Ricky Martin, who has previously joined Bad Bunny and others on the island in progressive political mobilisations, sang Lo que le pasó a Hawaii at the 2026 Super Bowl. The song says:

They want to take my river and my beach too
They want my neighborhood and grandma to leave
No, don't let go of the flag nor forget the lelolai
'Cause I don't want them to do to you what happened to Hawaii

RICKY MARTIN IN THE HOUSE

Another day, another media shill doing the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) job of turning the public against PIP claimants for them. Most annoyingly, this time it's a physically disabled person who is throwing people with mental health conditions under the bus. But then it is Julie Burchill.

Burchill is, by her own definition. a 'Rad-fem, Christian Zionist', she's best known for her abhorrent views on immigration and transphobia. So it figures that she's also horribly lateral ableist too. In a column in the i Paper Burchill wrote:

If you're too anxious to work but go on holiday, you shouldn't get PIP.

Siiiigh, same old bullshit. It doesn't need pointing out (again!) that personal independence payments (PIP) isn't an out-of-work benefit. The article actually barely mentions claimants going on holiday; it's a throwaway comment. But that didn't stop the editor from making it the most clickbait possible headline.

Thankfully, Burchill does correct herself on the employment fact in the piece, but she also adds:

Of course, you can work and still receive PIP - as I do - but I do think too many people are getting it when they could be supporting themselves.

Such as, for instance, a columnist who brags about squandering their wealth.

Burchill is of course, talking about people who she, and vast parts of the media, think don't actually deserve PIP from the DWP - people with mental health conditions. This is just the latest in a long line of the government trying to de-legitimise people with mental health conditions, whilst planning to make it harder for those same people to claim PIP.

Burchill rightly points out how hard it is to get PIP, even if you have a very physically obvious disability. In her case, she's a wheelchair user and can't walk. She said it took her six months to be approved for PIP, however she also took the chance to shit on other disabled people:

I can't help thinking that had I claimed the mental equivalent of a "bad back" - anxiety perhaps - I would have been awarded it a lot earlier

Burchill's 'article' is mostly a bizarre rant about how, if she's worked nearly every day since becoming a wheelchair user, what's stopping everyone else? Dunno babe, probably less understanding bosses and less flexibility because they're not rich. Calling herself a 'grafter' not a 'grifter', she says:

I can't think of anything worse for anyone's mental health than not having a reason to get out of bed in the morning.

It's really fucking sad that work is the only reason to get out of bed in the morning for many. My dog is my reason for getting out of bed. For some it's simple joys like a good cup of coffee, their fave tv show to catch up on, or seeing friends. I love my job, but I'm also not some capitalist drone whose only joy is work.

The thing about the old 'work is good for your mental health' argument, though, is that it usually comes from people who are supported in their work. It doesn't take into account just how soul-destroying and detrimental to your mental health an awful job with a horrible boss, can be.

Instead of sympathising with this point, Burchill essentially implies that disabled people should be happy with any old menial job, whether or not it's suited to their needs. Which, of course, fits the DWP's narrative perfectly and helps them push disabled people into work

There's also the point that apparently needs hammering home that PIP has fuck all to do with whether you can work or not. Because, despite stating this, she still spends the majority of the piece conflating anxiety with workshyness. Which, again, is something the government has done consistently.

Hilariously though, Burchill also thinks the government are on disabled people's side here. She calls them 'the chief sponsor of idleness'. It's always those who think they're sticking it to the establishment who are playing right into their hands.

At a time when the media and government are doing everything in their power to turn the public against people with mental health conditions, we don't need one of our own on their side too. Though it's made pretty clear that Burchill is one of those disabled people who thinks she will be spared from the hatred because she works hard and doesn't complain:

During my year in a wheelchair, I've had to deal with all of these, alongside other emotions as varied as fear and fury; if I and other severely physically disabled people can learn to process these feelings, why can't those with anxiety do the same

Let me tell you now, Julie, the hate mob doesn't give a fuck if you're on their side or not. They'll come for us all in the end and won't be happy until all disabled people are left to rot.

Burchill's piece was published alongside two others. The first by Carrie Grant who shares her own experience as a parent carer on how the SEND system failures feed into more people needing PIP. The second is by a former PIP assessor who points out how life-changing PIP can be for all claimants.

This could've and should've been an impactful and important series. However the i Paper couldn't help themselves and had to ensure they included a hefty dose of the scrounger narrative too. There are so many campaigners who also claim PIP that they could've asked to write this.

This was a deliberate choice to de-legitimise mental health claimants. 'Look, even REAL disabled people know they're faking!" The fact that it's a disabled person attacking other disabled people - and doing the DWP's job for them - shows just how insidious the media narrative really is.

Featured image via the Canary

By Rachel Charlton-Dailey

A Saudi official has attacked 'foreign actors' for fueling the war in Sudan. Their comment came after a Rapid Support Forces (RSF) drone killed 24 in Kordofan province. Fighting has displaced millions and killed up to 150,00 people.

The war is now in its third year. And the UK and others have played their part in letting the carnage run on.

The Sudan Doctors Network said RSF targeted:

a vehicle transporting displaced people fleeing South Kordofan State. The vehicle was traveling from the Dubeiker area in North Kordofan when it was attacked near Al-Rahad city.

Two infants died in the attack:

The attack resulted in the deaths of 24 people, including 8 children—two of whom were infants—and several women.

Sudan Doctors Network: 24 Killed, Including 8 Women and Children, in Rapid Support Forces Attack on Vehicle Transporting Them from the Dubeiker Area to Al-Rahad in North Kordofan

The Rapid Support Forces carried out another massacre in North Kordofan State by targeting a vehicle… pic.twitter.com/jDmZxJaZnr

— Sudan Doctors Network - شبكة أطباء السودان (@SDN154) February 7, 2026

The Sudanese foreign ministry said on 8 February:

This attack does not represent an isolated incident, but rather a continuation of a pattern adopted by the militia to obstruct humanitarian work and use deprivation of food as a means of pressure against civilians.

RSF are an Arab supremacist militia given to carrying out massacres of the indigenous population of Sudan. They have also been used by the UAE as mercenaries in Yemen. Despite the UAE's denials, Emirati military support is substantial, traceable, and decisive.

The Saudi foreign ministry also commented, thought it did not name the offenders. They said:

The Kingdom affirms that these acts are unjustifiable under any circumstances and constitute flagrant violations of all humanitarian norms and relevant international agreements.

In a clear swipe at RSF's main backer, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), they added:

foreign interference and the continued actions of certain parties in supplying illicit weapons, mercenaries, and foreign fighters—despite their stated support for a political solution.

They said this foreign influence:

constitutes a primary factor in prolonging the conflict and exacerbating the suffering of the Sudanese people.

This is the latest development in the two oil-rich, Western allied Gulf states' failing relationship.

The UAE and Saudi relations are are uneasy, to say the least. The two are traditionally allies - and recipients of US and other Western support - but their falling out is being felt throughout the Gulf and the Horn of Africa.

As the Times of India has it:

For more than a decade, Riyadh and Abu Dhabi appeared virtually inseparable. They crushed Islamist movements, dictated oil markets, blockaded Qatar and presented themselves as the ultimate power brokers in the Arabian Peninsula. The two kingdoms were often described as strategic siblings, bound by shared vision, capital and a mutual obsession with stability on their terms.

But that alliance has ruptured. Yemen is one point of contention:

Riyadh seeks a unified Yemen under its influence: manageable, stable and friendly to Saudi security interests. Abu Dhabi, however, is pursuing a different vision through its backing of the Southern Transitional Council.

But that disagreement has also played out in Sudan - with deadly consequences.

The Sudan war "amplified the stakes" offering:

both Gulf states an opportunity to project influence in Africa.

For the UAE:

Sudan's Rapid Support Forces, controlling gold mines, smuggling routes and borderlands, became a direct conduit to resources. Gold, logistics and influence could be secured without the bureaucracy of formal state structures.

The Canary discussed the role of Sudan's gold mines here. The Saudi regime "backed the Sudanese Armed Forces":

not out of friendship, but fear. Saudi Arabia recognised that paramilitary backed fragmentation could set a dangerous precedent, threatening its own southern flank and regional ambition

Three years in, the war in Sudan has undoubtedly been exacerbated by Gulf interference. But other regional and global powers bear responsibility too.

Israel has backed both RSF and the Sudanese government at different times. Turkey, Egypt, and Russia have a role too. And British-sourced equipment has been seen in RSF hands, presumably a result of UK arms sales to UAE.

On October 2025, Labour foreign office minister Stephen Doughty admitted:

We are aware of reports of a small number of U.K.-made items having been found in Sudan, but there is no evidence in the recent reporting of U.K. weapons or ammunition being used in Sudan.

However he resisted calls for an embargo on UAE and said the UK would use its UN security council role:

to call for an immediate end to this violence [and] ensure that international humanitarian law is respected and upheld.

This mealy-mouthed response is typical. Not least because Campaign against the Arms Trade (CAAT) have reported:

The third largest recipient of arms export licences was the United Arab Emirates (UAE) with £172m of military equipment.

CAAT added:

Of particular concern is the £1,966,582 of exports in the military vehicles and components category, given that UK-made engines have been found in armoured personnel carriers used by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in its genocide in Sudan.

The British Labour government is deeply implicated in the killing in Sudan. And it is aligned with both sides in the Saudi/UAE proxy war. The British will likely continue to prevaricate while people die. But as long as UK arms firm CEOs and shareholders get their new yacht or third home, that seems to be fine by Keir Starmer's Labour.

Featured image via the Canary

By Joe Glenton

Albert Bartlett was born in Shanghai in 1923, worked on the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos, got his PhD from Harvard, and spent his career as a physics professor at the University of Colorado. But he's best known for one lecture he gave 1,742 times over 36 years — roughly once every 8.5 days — before his death in 2013 at age 90. — Read the rest

The post The bacteria-in-a-bottle thought experiment that explains why we're bad at seeing disaster coming appeared first on Boing Boing.

The State Department is removing all posts from its X accounts made before January 20, 2025 — and that includes posts from Trump's own first term.

The posts will be internally archived but no longer publicly visible. If you want to see them, you'll need to file a Freedom of Information Act request, NPR reports. — Read the rest

The post State Department is deleting all X posts from before Trump's return — even from Trump's first term appeared first on Boing Boing.

A fascinating article in the New York Times details a major cultural shift for readers -- mass market paperbacks are going away. Of course, the Illuminatus! trilogy originally was published as a trio of mass market paperbacks.

I used to buy many mass market paperbacks. I still have my original paperbacks of Illuminatus! But nowadays, when I buy a cheap book, it's an ebook. I have hundreds of books on my Kindle, most of them purchased on sale for a couple of bucks or so. Mass market paperbacks used to be the easiest way to be able to read anywhere. But because I have a smartphone, and a Kindle app on my phone, I have a big library I carry everywhere I go. 

Apple's USB-C Magic Mouse is back on sale for about $11 off its usual retail price of $79. At $68, that's a savings of 14 percent for one of Apple's best accessories from a company that does not often run sales.

The multi-touch mouse was first released in 2009 with a modest refresh released in 2015 and the addition of a USB-C port in 2024. The rechargeable mouse features gesture controls and automatically pairs with your Mac when connected via USB. The Magic Mouse can also be used with an iPad via Bluetooth, or with a Windows PC, though in that case, functionality would be limited.

Famously, Jony Ive's design of the Magic Mouse sees its charge port on the underside of the body, rendering it unusable while charging. In 2024 there were rumors of a more comprehensive redesign coming but nothing has materialized since.

Follow @EngadgetDeals on X for the latest tech deals and buying advice.

My biggest complaints with AI tend to be with the human beings who are rushing language learning models into mass adoption without doing their basic due diligence. Like AI toy maker Bondu, the creator of "AI" enabled stuffed animals, which recently left the stored chat logs children have with their polyester-filled automated friends openly available online to anybody with a Gmail account:

"[security researcher Joel Margolis] made a startling discovery: Bondu's web-based portal, intended to allow parents to check on their children's conversations and for Bondu's staff to monitor the products' use and performance, also let anyone with a Gmail account access transcripts of virtually every conversation Bondu's child users have ever had with the toy."

At this point there's just no excuse for this sort of thing. We've been writing for more than a decade about how most "smart," internet-connected toys were being rushed to market without adequate privacy and security safeguards, creating OpSec risks for kids before they've even been adequately potty trained.

Now, as we've done in sectors like health insurance and journalism, we've slathered half-cooked language learning models all over existing dysfunction we refused to address, called it innovation, and then ignored the fact we've introduced entirely new problems.

In this case, the included exposed data included kids' names, birth dates, family member names, and even the detailed summaries and transcripts of every previous chat between the child and their Bondu stuffed animals.

On the plus side, once alerted, the company quickly fixed the issue in a matter of minutes. And when asked by journalists about it, didn't try to lie about the problem (a low bar, but still):

"When WIRED reached out to the company, Bondu CEO Fateen Anam Rafid wrote in a statement that security fixes for the problem "were completed within hours, followed by a broader security review and the implementation of additional preventative measures for all users." He added that Bondu "found no evidence of access beyond the researchers involved."

If hackers are clever they don't leave many footprints, so that last bit might not be worth much.

One recent survey found that 84 percent of Americans want tougher privacy laws. But corruption has ensured that the country still lacks even baseline internet-era privacy protections. The powers that be have decided, repeatedly, to prioritize mass commercialized surveillance over public safety, and it's only a matter of time before those chickens come home to roost in ways we can't even begin to consider.

Morgan McSweeney is the architect of Keir Starmer's Labour and a top-tier dickhead. On 8 February, he finally resigned - namely because he was the man who proposed that the disgraced Peter Mandelson take on the ambassador to the US position.

It seems the Labour party hasn't changed, however, as politicians are coming out to defend him:

Sorry to see this decision by Morgan, it's a very dignified statement and reflects the character of someone I know to be thoughtful and dedicated to Labour and the security and prosperity of the country. https://t.co/DIDBCSvHsM

— Luke Akehurst (@lukeakehurst) February 8, 2026

If you're not too sure of who McSweeney is, let's just call him the cunt-in-chief behind Starmer. The Canary's Skwawkbox captured who he is perfectly:

McSweeney is a horror. Undeclared donations from the Israel lobby, spying on journalists, covert campaigns to destroy media that highlight his boss's crimes, deep connections with genocidal Israel and a coordinated sabotage campaign to prevent Labour winning the 2019 general election. His fingerprints are on all of it.

How the fuck can you defend that? But weirdly, some Labour politicians have decided to die on that hill.

Giant walking baby and Zionist shill Luke Akehurst is one of those who defended him. Weird, that a man who consistently denies a genocide would have other shit opinions…

Akehurst doing his best to ignore his world crumbling around him

One by one, we're going to pluck these disgusting, paracitical, perverted little creeps out of power

And you're on the list Luke, you Zionist loving little polyp

Tick tock

Laura Álvarez has sparked debate online within Your Party following a comment about a candidate not aligning with Jeremy Corbyn's slate. And the row has helped highlight the urgent need for both transparency and respectful debate in the party.

Álvarez, who married Corbyn in 2012, kept a low profile while Corbyn was Labour leader. But she has spoken a lot about Your Party during its founding process, particularly in support of Corbyn's The Many slate in the party's Central Executive Committee (CEC) elections.

The Grassroots Left slate aligns with Zarah Sultana's vision for Your Party. And Álvarez suggested that a candidate for this slate was "unknown in the community" of Islington.

This was apparently a reference to Anahita Zardoshti, the "founder and chair of Your Party's Islington proto-branch". Zardoshti came second in the endorsement phase of the CEC election:

Who's unknown, @LauraAlvarezJC? If you're gonna have a dig at Anahita at least have the good grace to name her.

I'd say the number of endorsements largely speaks for itself as for whether she is 'unknown'… https://t.co/fjXGTSTs49 pic.twitter.com/ZuOLvqW9Wk

— Cllr James Giles (@JamesGilesRBK) February 8, 2026

Just a bit rude to claim you don't know a person when you voted for them to be a council candidate with @IslingtonIndep and invited them to your Christmas party.

Here's a pic of me and @Ana_Zardoshti at your Christmas party with Jeremy to help jog your memory https://t.co/0P0UnoEBE7 pic.twitter.com/y9tcuuPRIK

— Nathaniel (@NathanielYPI) February 8, 2026

Councillor James Giles, a Sultana ally, questioned Álvarez's public comment. But Álvarez responded by saying:

I told you to never contact me again

Laura your ad hominem attacks on me, now on Anahita and the rest of the movement need to stop. And on the other items - I think we all know what happened.

The only thing I did on July 3rd was democratically vote on whether we wanted a sole leadership of Jeremy Corbyn or a…

— Cllr James Giles (@JamesGilesRBK) February 8, 2026

What followed was a number of comments asking Giles not to question Álvarez. But in the interests of transparency, it seems perfectly acceptable to scrutinise personal comments suggesting we should doubt candidates' role in their community.

The establishment smear campaign against the left that intensified under Corbyn's leadership of the Labour Party left deep scars. It left distrust, anger, and defensiveness. And it left pain.

However, we're at a moment where socialists are building back a meaningful resistance. And with the Green Party successfully tapping into the burning desire for change in the country, a Your Party that shuts down internal criticism or wastes time with factional arguments may not last too long.

There are genuine critiques we could make about everyone. And we don't need to support a specific faction in order to believe that. There needs to be open, respectful debate. Because members agree on most things, and it should be easy to reach comradely agreements on the other areas.

We absolutely should be asking questions about:

• The diversity within the pool of CEC candidates.
• How backroom deals have become too common.
• The questionable organisation of hustings and oversight of the election process.
• How people show up and challenge people they disagree with online, without falling into personal attacks.
• The lack of a level playing field in terms of data control.
• The potential for online misrepresentation of slates' positions.
• What candidates have had to agree to in order to belong to a particular slate.
• How to bridge cultural, age, and class divides to bring people together.
• How to replace the struggle for power and control at the top with community empowerment.

There is a real buzz on the ground about what Your Party could become. People know what they want. And as the statistics show pretty clearly, that isn't factional infighting and public spats. Because there are hundreds of thousands of people who initially expressed interest but have so far stayed away.

The Greens have grown massively under Zack Polanski because there's a clear direction of travel, and there's a willingness to work together with all progressives. If Your Party genuinely wants to grow into a meaningful movement for change, it could learn a lot from the Greens right now.

Featured image via the Canary

By The Canary

Labour and its press allies continue to try to undermine popular Green party candidate Hannah Spencer in the Gorton and Denton by-election. Predictably, the tactics on show are the most hypocritical and tin-eared imaginable.

In an Observer article yesterday, Labour's corporate-lobbyist, NHS privatiser candidate Angeliki Stogia tried laughably to claim that Spencer should stand aside because:

Every Green vote is going to make Reform very happy.

With hypocrisy that should be astonishing but isn't, she also claimed the Greens had shared "misleading" polling showing they are the main hope of defeating Reform UK.

Labour just got caught using a poll based on responses from just 51 people to try to claim it is in a good position. Even Labour fan and war criminal Alistair Campbell dismissed it as "bullshit".

The hypocrisy didn't end there. Stogia also claimed to be angry that Reform is "spread[ing] division" in the constituency. Reform's whole playbook is division, of course, but Stogia's boss Keir Starmer constantly tries to out-Reform Reform. Remember his "island of strangers" speech, compared to racist Enoch Powell's "rivers of blood" incitement? Or how about Labour boasting about how many people it has deported?

Stogia's Guardian-assisted nonsense comes shortly after Labour's deputy leader Lucy Powell begged and stamped her feet to demand the Greens step aside. But the bookies - not known for throwing their money away - make Spencer odds-on (5/6) favourite to win, with Reform next on 13/8. Labour trail miles behind - 9/1 in a three-horse race is dire.

If Labour was really interested in 'stopping Reform', Starmer would be telling Stogia to stand aside and begging the public to support the Greens.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Anika Sweetland, the Reform party's supposed climate expert is anything but.

Here she is on shithouse Lee Anderson's GB News' segment discussing if net zero is a scam:

Good morning fellow Reformers, patriots and climate realists! Last night I had the honour of standing up for our country

At this point, everyone knows the wretched Peter Mandelson shared government information with Jeffrey Epstein. Mandelson wasn't the only Epstein associate with access to confidential UK info, however. The former prince Andrew Windsor served as a British trade envoy, and he was also feeding what he knew to the now-dead paedophile:

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor shared confidential information with Jeffrey Epstein from his official role as a trade envoy. He forwarded an official report from his trips to Singapore, Vietnam, China, and Hong Kong to Epstein just five minutes after receiving it. pic.twitter.com/hpMD07ikFd

— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) February 8, 2026

The screengrabbed email above is from the latest release of the Epstein Files. In it, you can see that Windsor received reports of visits to Vietnam, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Shenzen.

Did you receive these reports yourself?

Probably not, right; it would be weird if the trade envoy sent their reports to the general British public; it's even stranger to send them to a notorious international paedophile.

As reported by the BBC, Windsor served as trade envoy for ten years (2001-2011). The BBC additionally highlighted that:

Under official guidance, trade envoys have a duty of confidentiality over sensitive, commercial, or political information about their official visits.

In other words, he could (and should) get into trouble for this.

We'd be surprised if he faces any actual consequences, however, given the fact that he's escaped them all of his life. The Royals may have stripped him of his titles, but the entitlement remains. As the BBC report:

Earlier in February, Andrew moved out of his home in Windsor to the Sandringham Estate in Norfolk.

Buckingham Palace had announced in October that he would be moving from Royal Lodge, at the same time his title of prince was removed.

The former prince left the property on Monday night and is currently living at Wood Farm on the Sandringham Estate while his new permanent home undergoes renovations.

We don't know about you, but when we fuck up, our punishment isn't being sent to a managed country estate.

The BBC also asked Andrew Windsor to comment on all this. Surprise, surprise; he refused to do so.

Funny that he's no longer so free and easy with the information he'll share.

For more on the the Epstein Files, please read our article on how the media circus around Epstein is erasing the experiences of victims and survivors.

Featured image via Epstein Files

By Willem Moore

On Sunday 8 February, Americans came together to enjoy their annual 'Superbowl'. And when we say 'came together', we of course mean they found new ways to fight the culture war.

Trump, of course, led the charge:

Trump crashes out over Bad Bunny's halftime show pic.twitter.com/XE2shbQRtm

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 9, 2026

Doesn't this guy have a country to run into the ground?

The performer Trump is talking about is Bad Bunny, who released one of the best albums of 2025.

There's really no need for us to promote his album, because some of the tracks have had well over a billion listens in the past 12 months.

Many right-wingers are asking 'WhY iS a PuErTo RiCaN pErFoRmInG??', and the simple truth is because the Yanks fucking love him and his music.

Here's a video from his performance:

As we reported on 8 February, Keir Starmer's chief-of-staff Morgan McSweeney resigned in disgrace. What is it they say about rats and sinking ships?

Tim Allen - Blairite leaving the Labour right sinking ship. When self-serving careerists like Allen are crying off, you know Starmer is finished. The writing is on the wall.

— Simone (@Slimbo32) February 9, 2026

As Skwawkbox wrote for the Canary:

Keir Starmer's appalling chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, has quit. According to 'mainstream' media, Starmer hopes this will ease the pressure that he has been under from the ongoing Mandelson scandal. If he really thinks this, he's more hopeless than we thought - and that's a tough bar to cross.

We don't think Allan going will help either. At the same time, it's certainly not going to hurt. Like most of his colleagues, Allan is another washed up Blairite with nothing to offer besides spite and failure.

People have highlighted that Allan is just one in a long line of comms directors:

Tim Allan - Keir Starmer's *fourth* director of communications since July 2024 - has quit his role.

He says: : "I have decided to stand down to allow a new No10 team to be built. I wish the PM and his team every success."

— Ashley Cowburn (@ashcowburn) February 9, 2026

A complete inability to hold on to a communications director hasn't done much for Labour's communications. Regardless of who's in charge, it's never reassuring to see four different people fighting over the steering wheel.

Here's what HG wrote for the Canary in September 2025:

Keir Starmer has appointed Tim Allan as Downing Street's new director of communications. Allan is a former trustee of Sex Matters - an anti-trans group.

According to the Financial Times, Allan has previously worked for Kazakhstan and Qatar, along with Vladimir Putin's government.

He also worked as the deputy director of communications for former Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair, under Alastair Campbell. Blair even called him 'more right-wing than me'.

A transphobic errand boy to Putin and Blair - this is who Starmer wanted in charge of his comms?

It's no wonder this ship is sinking.

Journalist Kevin Schofield said the following about Allan:

Tim Allan was brought in to No10 in September to replace the highly-effective and widely-respected Steph Driver and James Lyons.

Now gone. https://t.co/hEitd1A0g6

— Kevin Schofield (@KevinASchofield) February 9, 2026

We must have blinked and this period of 'effectiveness' and 'respect' that Starmer's operation enjoyed.

Speaking of Starmer, it was rumoured that he planned to step down today. That no longer seems to be the case - not for the moment at least:

Wait, has he even done a U-turn on his own resignation? pic.twitter.com/rdqaA9hlIj

— Jonathan Pie (@JonathanPieNews) February 9, 2026

We don't know who'll step into the comms role next, but good luck selling this absolute clusterfuck of a government to the British public.

Featured image via Terry Ott (Wikimedia)

By Willem Moore

A Democrat running to pick up one of the party's top target House seats recently worked for two defense contractors looking to help the federal government use artificial intelligence for border surveillance and military projects. 

Cait Conley, a Special Operations combat veteran and former national security adviser under former President Joe Biden, is running in the crowded Democratic primary to challenge incumbent Republican Rep. Mike Lawler in New York's 17th Congressional District. Her candidate financial disclosures show that she earned more than $80,000 between January 2024 and July 2025 from two companies, Primer AI and Hidden Level.

Both companies partner with far-right billionaire Peter Thiel's surveillance tech firm Palantir to help government agencies use AI. Both are military contractors; Hidden Level holds an active contract with the Department of War, and Primer's most recent one was paid out last year. Primer has also praised President Donald Trump's AI policy and advertises on its website that it "helps" the Department of Homeland security with data and intelligence work and that "Primer AI platforms support DHS missions," but it does not appear to have an active deal with the department in a federal contracting database. 

"Cait believes AI can be both an opportunity and a risk to the middle class and is determined to shape AI policy so that it grows and strengthens middle-class New Yorkers, rather than being used to further enrich billionaires," said Conley campaign manager Emily Goldson in a statement to The Intercept. "She'll be a leader in Congress, ensuring working Americans are included in the growth created and aren't left behind." 

Running in a swing district north of New York City, Conley has walked a fine line on matters of immigration and the national security apparatus, blasting Trump for deploying the military to U.S. cities and criticizing immigration agents for killing protesters. On her campaign website, she pledges to "stand strong on our national security priorities," including "defending the homeland, fighting crime, and fixing our broken immigration system."

Conley's close ties to companies at the intersection of AI and national security policy aren't a surprise given her military background. But her connections to the firms raise questions about how she might approach those policy sectors in Congress, said Albert Fox Cahn, a civil rights attorney who previously led the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project and is a lifelong resident of New York's 17th District. 

"At a time when we see so many Silicon Valley companies having their technology weaponized against immigrant communities, these sorts of consulting roles raise questions about what exactly she did and what lines were drawn," Cahn told The Intercept. 

It's unclear what exactly Conley did at the companies, according to her candidate disclosure filed with the House Clerk. She started consulting for Primer at some point after January 2024, when she left her previous job as an adviser for the Department of Homeland Security under Biden. In the period ending in July 2025, she earned $12,500 for her consulting work.  

Related Lawmakers Pave the Way to Billions in Handouts for Weapons Makers That the Pentagon Itself Opposed

Touting the candidate's military service, Goldson said that Conley "has worked with a range of private and public sector entities, either through her work at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) or as a consultant, to help keep American families and American infrastructure, like stadiums and other public spaces and our energy grid, safe from terrorist attacks." The campaign did not comment on The Intercept's questions about whether Conely was still employed by either firm.

Between January 2024 and July 2025, Conley earned $68,000 from Hidden Level, which works in radio-frequency sensing and airspace security, including monitoring unauthorized drone activity. Hidden Level's data is used in Palantir's Maven platform, which Trump's Pentagon awarded a $480 million contract in May. When Trump announced his plan to build a "golden dome" missile defense system  — described by one critic as "more of a political marketing scheme than a carefully thought-out defense program" — Hidden Level released a statement applauding his plan and saying it "stands ready to support this mission today." Of a White House directive to cut waste in commercial technology in April, the company said the "policy shift doesn't just validate the model Hidden Level was built on, it demands it."

"I get nervous when people are quick to invoke the language of national security and counter-terrorism. It raises more questions than it answers."

Both companies have received lucrative contracts from the federal government under previous administrations. Primer has won at least $7.2 million in contracts from the Department of Defense since 2021, according to federal spending records. Hidden Level earned just under $3 million in Pentagon contracts to monitor airspace and bolster the federal system that manages drone traffic between 2022 and 2024 under former President Joe Biden.

"We've seen just how brazenly people can manipulate the label 'national security and counterterrorism' and the ways it can mask government efforts aimed at people who never pose a threat to our country. As a civil rights lawyer and activist, I get very nervous when people are quick to invoke the language of national security and counter-terrorism," said Cahn, the civil rights lawyer. "It raises more questions than it answers."

The seat in suburban New York, which includes north Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, and Dutchess Counties, is a top priority for Democrats. It was one of four New York House seats the party lost to Republicans amid a slew of upsets in the 2022 midterms. The winner of the June Democratic primary will take on Lawler, a Republican who flipped the seat that cycle after a combination of redistricting and Democratic infighting helped him beat former Democratic Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney. 

Conley is one of six candidates running for the Democratic nomination. Other contenders include local official and tech founder Peter Chatzky, who has funded his own campaign with more than $10 million; Rockland County Legislator Beth Davidson; lawyer and former television reporter Mike Sacks; nonprofit executive Effie Phillips-Staley; and Air Force veteran John Cappello. 

Conley has campaigned on her military experience and highlighted the fact that the Russian government banned her from the country because of her work on Biden's National Security Council. She said she hopes voters in the swing district will see her lack of traditional political experience as a positive. "We need people who take public service seriously, who are not politicians, who are actual leaders and problem solvers," Conley told the New York Times in March.

Her campaign originally focused primarily on issues of affordability and improving Hudson Valley infrastructure, including criticizing Trump's economic policies. As the campaign progressed, Conley has become more aggressive in criticizing Trump's intensifying attacks on cities around the country and his nationwide crackdown on immigrants. 

Goldson said that Conley believed in holding ICE accountable, investigating the officials responsible for the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, and impeaching Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. "Congress must pass legislation ensuring ICE operates lawfully like local law enforcement, including banning masks and requiring judicial warrants for arrest, and sending CBP back to the border where it belongs," she added. 

Lawler, meanwhile, has urged immigration agents to "reassess their current tactics," while refraining from criticizing Trump.

Conley has faced criticism throughout the campaign — much of it from Republicans — for not voting in recent midterm elections and registering as a Democrat just before she launched her campaign. Critics attacked her for moving to the district in January from Virginia, though she grew up in the Hudson Valley. 

Her detractors have pointed out that many of her donors come from outside the district, several of them from the defense and tech industries.

Conley has received $10,000 in contributions from Matt and Kimberly Grimm, the former of whom is the co-founder of Anduril Industries. Anduril, which was heavily backed by Thiel, builds autonomous drones, systems to surveil the border, andsurveillance towers powered by AI.

"There's a lot of questions to answer, and I think that this is true for candidates across the country who have worked for these companies in the past or who you know are receiving large donations from their employees," Cahn said. "There's a growing recognition that many of these tech firms are carrying out a mission that is fundamentally at odds with the values that Democrats hold and most Americans hold."

Conley's donors also include a vice president and other employees at the top Washington lobbying firm BGR group, which has represented the Saudi government - until it cut ties with the country in 2018 - and companies like defense giant Raytheon and the energy behemoth Chevron, as well as big pharmaceutical firms. BGR vice president Joel Bailey gave Conley's campaign $500 in July, while BGR principals Syd Terry and Fred Turner each also gave Conley's campaign $250. BGR senior director Hai Peng has given Conley's campaign $5,500 to Conley's campaign since May. None of the BGR donors listed residences in New York. 

In a statement to The Intercept, Peng said he met Conley at Oklahoma's Fort Sill close to two decades ago and made the contribution in his personal capacity. "I genuinely believe she is the kind of leader our country needs right now," Peng said. 

Conley has been endorsed by several political action committees including MD PAC, previously known as Majority Democrats PAC, which has given $90,900, VoteVets, Equality PAC, and Giffords PAC. She's also endorsed by several local officials and political leaders, as well as Rep. Pat Ryan, D-N.Y. 

Cahn said he wasn't sure who, if anyone, he would vote for in the primary. But he sees the race as an example of the opportunity voters have to hold Democrats to a higher standard of accountability than in the past, particularly when it comes to policy issues like technology, surveillance and artificial intelligence. 

"We're at a new moment of accountability within the tech sector more broadly, as we start to recognize that so many tech companies are part of the apparatus that is powering ICE's attacks," Cahn said. "This is especially notable for someone who's running based off of their time in military defense roles."

The post NY Democratic House Candidate Worked for Palantir Partners Pushing AI Border Surveillance appeared first on The Intercept.

It has rained in parts of the country every day of the year so far and downpours are expected to continue this week

In a "miserable and relentlessly wet" start to the year, rain has fallen somewhere in the UK every single day for weeks on end.

With more than 100 flood warnings in force across the country and further downpours forecast this week, scientists say the atmospheric forces behind Britain's endless drizzle are the same ones driving devastating floods across Spain and Portugal.

Former Grand Prix crew chief Peter Bom traveled to Sepang for the first tests of the 2026 MotoGP season, and he sits down with Roadracing World MotoGP Editor Mat Oxley to share his first-hand insights in the latest edition of the Oxley Bom MotoGP Podcast.

Listen to the podcast here:

The post Oxley Bom MotoGP Podcast: What Happens In Sepang … appeared first on Roadracing World Magazine | Motorcycle Riding, Racing & Tech News.

The first PlayStation State of Play livestream of 2026 has been announced. The stream will take place on February 12 at 5PM ET. It will run for over an hour and feature PlayStation Studios titles as well as third-party projects and indie games that are bound for PS5. You can watch it on PlayStation's official YouTube channel (in English, Japanese or with English subtitles) or on Twitch.

As the first State of Play of the year, Sony is going to want to drum up some more hype for its upcoming release slate. Since Bungie's Marathon is due to arrive on March 5, that will surely make an appearance. MLB The Show 26, which is out on March 17, will likely get a look in too. We could also get another peek at Saros, the highly anticipated follow-up to Housemarque's Returnal, which will arrive on March 20. A new trailer for Marvel's Wolverine isn't out of the question, but Sony could wait until a summer showcase to give us another look at that one. 

The last State of Play took place in November, but that one was focused solely on games coming out of Asia and Japan. Before that, Sony also had a showcase during Tokyo Game Show in September, which featured a first look at gameplay from the aforementioned Wolverine, which is due to arrive later in 2026.

A big day in streaming has finally arrived: HBO Max has finally announced it's coming to the United Kingdom and Ireland. The two countries join over 110 territories worldwide that already offer HBO Max. Some HBO shows, like Euphoria, have already been available in these regions through other platforms. HBO Max will bring titles like The Pitt, One Battle After Another and Sinners. It will also air the upcoming Harry Potter series. 

An HBO Max subscription will be available in the UK and Ireland starting on Thursday, March 26. Plans will start at Basic with Ads for £5 per month, offering all titles except movies that first stream on HBO Max after a theatrical release. Then there's Standard with Ads for £6 per month, which includes those releases and 30 downloads. Both can stream on two devices at a time. 

Anyone who wants an ad-free experience can purchase a Standard or Premium plan. The former has all titles available on two devices, up to 30 downloads and, of course, no ads. The Premium plan comes with four devices in 4K Ultra HD with Dolby Atmos — if the system has capabilities. 

Interestingly, the expanded area comes as Netflix prepares to own Warner Bros., including HBO and HBO Max. While there's no indication of whether this had any influence, Netflix has long been available in the UK and Ireland. 

The Dutch Data Protection Authority (AP) says it was one of the many organizations popped when attackers raced to exploit recent Ivanti vulnerabilities as zero-days.…

Microsoft suffered a service disruption over the weekend after a power incident at an Azure datacenter in the West US region affected Windows Update.…

Or both Monday and Tuesday?

If Saturday and Sunday are the weekend, why not call Monday the Weekstart?

Push to restart uranium mining in Patagonia has sparked fears about the environmental impact and loss of sovereignty over key resources

On an outcrop above the Chubut River, one of the few to cut across the arid Patagonian steppe of southern Argentina, Sergio Pichiñán points across a wide swath of scrubland to colourful rock formations on a distant hillside.

"That's where they dug for uranium before, and when the miners left, they left the mountain destroyed, the houses abandoned, and nobody ever studied the water," he says, citing suspicions arising from cases of cancer and skin diseases in his community. "If they want to open this back up, we're all pretty worried around here."

Elon Musk says SpaceX has shifted its near-term priorities from Mars settlement plans to building what he called a "self-growing city on the Moon," arguing the lunar target is faster and more achievable. In a post on X, Musk claims the company could complete this in less than 10 years, while doing the same on Mars would take over 20 years.

This marks a major shift for the aerospace company, as Musk points out that the logistics of first completing a proof of concept on the moon are easier with respect to launch windows and proximity to Earth. The SpaceX founder is notorious for promising optimistic timelines that never come to pass, and said in 2017 that a base on Mars would be ready for its first settlers as early as 2024.

In subsequent replies to other posts Musk predicted "Mars will start in 5 or 6 years, so will be done parallel with the Moon, but the Moon will be the initial focus." He also said a manned Mars flight might happen in 2031.

Early last year Musk said in a post on X that SpaceX would be going "straight to Mars" and that "the Moon is a distraction." This was in response to Space industry analyst Peter Hague pointing out that among other considerations, lunar regolith, a material found on the surface of the moon, is about 45 percent oxygen. In 2023 NASA proved this oxygen could be extracted, which would yield enormous payload savings as opposed to shipping liquid oxygen between Earth and Mars.

NASA's Artemis missions, which SpaceX is a contractor for at certain stages, are planned to see humans back on the lunar surface by 2028. Artemis II, during which astronauts will circle the moon before returning to Earth, is set to launch in March of this year.

SpaceX resumed launching Falcon 9 rockets this weekend after last week's second stage incident. At the same time, CEO Elon Musk confirmed that the company has shifted its focus to "building a self-growing city on the Moon" within a decade.…

European spending on sovereign cloud infrastructure services is forecast to more than triple from 2025 to 2027 as geopolitical tension drives investment in homegrown services, according to Gartner.…

Taiwan's vice-premier has ruled out relocating 40 percent of the country's semiconductor production to the US, calling the Trump administration's goal "impossible."…

The good folks at Orico have sent me their latest power-strip to review. On the surface, the specs are pretty good - two UK sockets, two USB-C for PowerDelivery, and two USB-A for legacy devices.

Let's put it though its paces!

Physically, it is a little larger than I was expecting. The two UK sockets are far enough apart to easily get your fingers around the plugs. Similarly, the USB ports are well-spaced. There's a tiny LED to show that power is connected, but it isn't offensively bright.

The UK plug is tiny:

Even better, it comes with a proper fuse! The power cord isn't removable, but is long enough for most purposes.

How much power can it supply? This is what the spec sheet says:

But there is a fly in the ointment. While 25W is the most that a single USB-C port can output, the power drops once multiple devices are connected. If you have two or more plugged in, the total output is limited to a mere 15W. Not per-port; total!

25W is already fairly low by PowerDelivery standards, so you won't be using this to power your gaming laptop while charging your tablet and headphones.

I used my Plugable USB-C Power Meter with some high-quality USB cables. The Orico mostly lives up to its promises.

When charging my laptop from either USB-C port, I was able to measure 22W (12V ⎓ 1.85A). Pretty close to the spec.

As soon as I plugged my phone into the other USB-C port, that dropped that down to just under 8W (4.8 ⎓ 1.65A) per port. Again, right on the promised 15W total.

The USB-A port happily delivered 7.5W (5V ⎓ 1.5A) - much lower than expected. That dropped to around 5W (5V ⎓ 1A) once a USC-C load was connected. The C port was only delivering ~10W which wasn't enough to meaningfully charge the laptop.

The flat plug is handy for plugging this in to those hard-to-reach spaces. The cable is long enough for most uses. The mixture of ports isn't for everyone, but handy if you still have legacy devices you need to power.

It meets the promised specification - but the specs are a bit of a let-down. You can get smaller devices which will do 60W charging from USB-C, and they'll spread that out over all their ports.

The two UK sockets are a nice-to-have, but I can't help feeling that they'll mostly be used for adding additional chargers.

It is cheap-ish - US$30 / £20 - and comes in a range of colours. If you need a long cable and don't need ultra-fast charging, this will do.

Large blooms of seaweed are increasingly being reported along coastlines globally, from Europe and Asia to the tropics and beyond.

Both native and invasive (non-native) seaweeds are appearing in quantities that are hard to ignore and at unusual or surprising times of year.

As an earth observation and remote-sensing scientist, I track these blooms from space using high-resolution satellite imagery. My research shows that seaweed blooms are getting bigger.

My team's 2025 study reveals a significant rise in sargassum blooms in the north-eastern tropical Atlantic, with a staggering 2.6 million tonnes washing up in September 2020. This is the first long-term analysis of trends in seaweed blooms from 2011 to 2022 in this region.

These unpredictable tides of seaweed have serious consequences for West African coastal communities and marine ecosystems. Our research shows that warming sea surface temperatures link closely with peaks in seaweed growth. Essentially, warmer temperatures can promote seaweed growth and lead to bloom surges.

Seaweed blooms are not a new phenomenon. But over the past 15-20 years, their scale and persistence have increased noticeably.

Of particular concern are free-floating seaweeds: species that float at the ocean surface, either because they detach from the seabed or because they spend their entire lives drifting. Unlike seaweeds that are anchored to the seafloor, floating seaweed can travel long distances to new territories and accumulate in large mats or wash ashore in huge quantities.

One example I have spent much of my career studying is sargassum. Like something from a sci-fi movie, I've seen swathes of sargassum seaweed spreading across the tropical Atlantic, with mats reaching depths of 7 m and spanning hundreds of square miles.

While most sargassum species are anchored to the seafloor, two species - Sargassum natans and Sargassum fluitans - are entirely free floating. They float freely at the surface of the ocean, kept buoyant by small air-filled grape-like sacs called pneumatocysts, which lift them up towards the surface for photosynthesis.

Our study shows that, since 2011, huge blooms of sargassum seaweed have appeared across the tropical Atlantic, piling up on coasts in the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico and increasingly West Africa. This drifting seaweed makes fishing difficult and causes mayhem for coastal communities.

Read more: How seaweed is a powerful, yet surprising, climate solution

Seaweed plays an essential role in marine ecosystems, but excessive growth can disrupt them. Large floating mats block sunlight, limiting the growth of seagrasses and corals below. They also alter oxygen conditions in the water, and when seaweed decomposes, particularly in sheltered bays or on beaches, it can create low-oxygen environments that are harmful to marine life.

Some of the most striking consequences are seen on wildlife. In tropical regions, sargassum has accumulated on turtle nesting beaches, with recent studies suggesting that up to a quarter of nesting habitat can be affected. Hatchlings struggle to move through both sand and dense seaweed before eventually reaching the sea, exhausted. This reduces their chances of survival.

Sargassum as an invasive species has actually found its way to UK waters, but sargassum blooms are not nearly as vast as in the tropical Atlantic. Blooms of other types of seaweed are becoming more noticeable in the UK and Europe. For example, ulva, a green seaweed known as sea lettuce regularly forms dense mats on the surface of the sea in places like Poole harbour, Dorset.

In small amounts, ulva is a native and largely harmless part of UK coastal ecosystems. But when it blooms excessively, it can start to cause problems. Thick mats at the surface reduce the amount of sunlight reaching seagrasses and other organisms below, while decomposition can reduce oxygen levels in the water, creating stressful conditions for fish and invertebrates and death of plants and animals as a result.

Across Europe, invasive seaweeds are becoming a growing concern. In the Mediterranean, species such as Rugulopteryx okamurae (originally from the northwest Pacific) have spread rapidly, likely introduced through shipping routes. These seaweeds can attach to the seabed, but then detach, float for long distances, and then reattach elsewhere, allowing them to spread efficiently along coastlines. In parts of Spain and Portugal, large accumulations are now washing up on beaches, with negative effects similar to those seen with sargassum in the tropics.

Even when blooms are smaller or more localised, their effects can still be disruptive. Seaweed accumulation can interfere with recreation, small-scale fishing and coastal tourism - all important parts of the UK's coastal economy.

Seaweed growth is driven by a combination of triggers and favourable conditions, so there isn't a single cause.

In the case of sargassum in the tropical Atlantic, one important trigger appears to have been an anomaly in the large scale atmosphere-ocean pattern known as the North Atlantic Oscillation in 2009. This change in atmospheric pressure at sea helped redistribute seaweed from the Sargasso Sea. Once established in new regions, further seaweed growth was fuelled by access to nutrients.

Seaweed growth is limited by the availability of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus. As long as those nutrients are available for them, they will grow. Nutrient-rich runoff from agriculture, rivers such as the Amazon and Congo, and sediment inputs all deliver these nutrients into the ocean - so human-caused pollution also plays a part.

Together, warming waters, nutrient enrichment and changing ocean circulation can create ideal conditions for blooms to persist and expand.

Seaweed blooms, while sometimes problematic, are fundamental to ocean ecosystems. They act as habitats to small fish and crustaceans. They absorb carbon dioxide through photosynthesis and transport it to deeper waters. They are also a valuable resource. They are used to make fertiliser and building materials, pharmaceuticals and potentially biofuels.

With effective monitoring, more accurate forecasting and better management, communities can live alongside seaweed blooms, harnessing their benefits while minimising environmental and economic consequences.

Don't have time to read about climate change as much as you'd like?
Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation's environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 47,000+ readers who've subscribed so far.

My previous research on sargassum has been supported by the Economic and Social Research Council GCRF (Grant number: ES/T002964/1), and the UK Natural Environment Research Council (grant number NE/W004798/1), a scholarship from Southampton Marine and Maritime Institute, University of Southampton, and the School of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton.

Discord is the latest company looking to bolster its child safety (again). Starting in March, all users will have a "teen-appropriate experience" by default. Unlocking adult content and age-gated spaces will require a (usually one-time) verification process.

The platform's big safety update encompasses communication settings, restricted access to age-gated spaces and content filtering. Users who aren't verified as adults will see blurred sensitive content. In addition, age-restricted channels, servers and app commands will be blocked. DMs and friend requests from unknown users will be routed to a separate inbox.

If you're an adult, removing these restrictions will require one of two verification methods at launch. You can take a selfie video for age estimation or submit a government ID to Discord's vendor partners. (Let's just hope the age estimations work better than Roblox's.) The company stresses that the video selfies you submit for age estimation never leave your device. And it claims ID documents sent to its vendor partners are deleted quickly, "in most cases, immediately after age confirmation."

Although Discord says the process will be one-and-done for most people, some may be required to submit multiple forms of verification. It also says that additional verification options will arrive in the future, including an age inference model that runs in the background.

This isn't the company's first attempt at beefing up its child safety measures. In 2023, it banned teen dating channels and AI-generated CSAM. Later that year, it added content filters and automated warnings. Those changes followed an NBC News report that 35 adults had been prosecuted on charges of "kidnapping, grooming or sexual assault" that involved Discord communication.

Alongside today's changes, Discord is recruiting for a new Teen Council. The group will include 10 to 12 teens aged 13 to 17. The company says this "will help ensure Discord understands — not assumes — what teens need, how they build meaningful connections, and what makes them feel safe and supported online." This sounds like the corporate equivalent of the parenting advice: "Don't just talk to your children; listen to them, too."

The child safety changes will start rolling out globally in early March. Both new and existing users will be required to submit verification for adult content.

This story was supported by the Pulitzer Center.

KAMPALA, UGANDA — Ever since President Donald Trump was elected a year ago, sex workers in Kampala have suffered. The sex has suddenly become too painful.

For years, sex workers and public health workers in Uganda say condoms and sexual lubricant were plentiful. Usually paid for by American foreign aid programs such as USAID and PEPFAR, they were distributed "in bars, in hospitals, in hotels, anywhere people gathered," said Turinawe Samson, founder of Universal Love Alliance Clinic in Kampala. In a country where about 5 percent of the population has HIV — the tenth highest prevalence rate in the world — easy access was key to slowing the spread of the disease and saving lives.

But immediately after Trump's election in November 2024 — months before the Trump administration cut funding to USAID and PEPFAR — things began to change in Uganda.

Lube became stigmatized as "an immoral product used by sex workers and homosexuals," according to Samson. Uganda's Ministry of Health doesn't group it among "essential health commodities," meaning its import isn't subsidized. Few health facilities in Uganda are able to procure it. Where it can be commercially purchased, the product is either prohibitively expensive due to diminishing supply, being dangerously sold past its expiration date, or both. 

This lack of lube and the broader shaming of sex in Uganda may well result in more vaginal and urinary tract infections, and more sexually transmitted infections — including HIV. 

"We need to not be judged."

People have started using "cooking oil, unhygienic products" or "nothing at all," said Babu Ramahdan, an LGBTQ+ and human rights activist who is on his way to becoming an unlikely Ugandan lube manufacturer. "I've got all the ingredients," he says with pride, and he's already made some samples (including in different flavors). He even met with university researchers eager to help him produce it domestically. But for Ramahdan, getting his product through clinical trials may prove as difficult as finding funding: In Uganda, as in large swaths of the United States, gaining institutional approval to research anything seemingly related to LGBTQ+ health has become almost impossible.

Condoms, too, are harder to find. They are not being given away freely with the same frequency, so those who need them increasingly must buy them. But they are economically out of reach for those who need them most in a country where the average income is less than $100 a month. Interviews with 10 patients and practitioners at a clinic run for and by sex workers revealed the stark economics: Sex with a condom goes for as little as 2,000 shillings (less than 50 U.S. cents) and up to about 6,000 ($1.50). But a condom costs a sex worker 3,000 to 4,000 shillings (between 75 cents and $1) — meaning they might lose money having safe sex. Sex without a condom pays much more: up to 10,000 shillings (about $2.50).

The newfound scarcity of lube and condoms illustrates just one example of how Trump's policies have disincentivized safe sex and encouraged the transmission of disease in Uganda — not just among sex workers and their clients, but also among men who have sex with men, transgender people, those who use injection drugs, and poor people. In Uganda, these people are euphemistically called "key populations," or KPs, most at risk for HIV (terms that acknowledge or even hint at queerness have been long avoided, and since Trump was elected, that's the case even for euphemisms like "minority"). 

"We need to not be judged," one sex worker said, describing her health care needs. "We need to be asked by a doctor, 'What are your needs?' We need to feel safe answering about the kinds of sex we have. We need to be listened to, honestly."

Related Trump Gutted AIDS Health Care at the Worst Possible Time

But since the stop work order came on January 20, 2025, for projects funded by the United States, the kinds of clinics where KPs like her will not be judged have either closed with little or no notice or become overburdened by a lack of resources, an influx of clients, or both. This has pushed KPs toward Uganda's public hospital system, where seeking care means putting themselves at risk of persecution from a homophobic government.

The sex worker who wished to not be judged is one of several who told The Intercept that women in Uganda who test positive for syphilis test three times at a public hospital are denied medication, accused of being a sex worker, or even turned over to the police. (The latter means she could be arrested, extorted, or raped.) People living with HIV report that if they seek antiretroviral medication at a public hospital, their privacy may not be respected and their HIV status may be exposed to their neighbors. Queer men, fearful of potentially being referred to the police for "aggravated homosexuality" and prosecuted under Uganda's Anti-Homosexuality Act, often skip seeking health care at public hospitals altogether. 

These fears are not confined to so-called KPs: They are making patients who may be suffering from anal fissures, vaginal infections, or rectal cancer refrain from seeking care because they are too afraid. In a country where abortion is illegal and more than 1 million people are living with HIV, this campaign of anti-queerness will result in more people forced to have children they do not want, more people becoming infected with HIV, and without medication, more people eventually dying of AIDS.

In November 2025, almost a year after Trump's global stop work order, it was nearly impossible to drive anywhere in Kampala and avoid the profile of a mustached man in a white shirt and Panama hat against a stark yellow background. 

It was the height of Uganda's election season, and President Yoweri Museveni was running for a seventh term as Uganda's president. His face — sometimes rendered several stories in height — was inescapable. At age 81 and already president for four decades, Museveni would soon secure another term after an election in which he shut down the internet and his opposition candidate claimed to have been abducted. Museveni will serve at least 45 years as president of Uganda, if he doesn't die in office.

Accompanying his 50-foot-high face was the phrase "Protecting the Gains — as we make a qualitative leap into high middle income status."

Seeing this propaganda spelled out over Uganda's unpaved roads (and even a UNICEF school made out a fraying tent) led Ugandans who spoke with The Intercept to ask: What gains? 

Uganda is not without any resources. It is known as the "pearl of Africa," a term perhaps first coined by Winston Churchill while on a safari to describe Uganda's beautiful plants and animals. Today it applies to American, European, and Chinese interest in Uganda's bounty of rare earth minerals. Uganda is also the birthplace of the River Nile, which not only feeds Northern Africa with fresh water but also the foundations of Western religion — like the story of Moses in the reeds in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. 

But Uganda has been subjected to what Guyanese historian Walter Rodney has called the deliberate European underdevelopment of Africa. Largely falling historically into five Bantu kingdoms, modern Uganda was colonized in the 19th century, with the Imperial British East Africa Company claiming control of the region in the 1880s. (Anti-queerness was part of the colonial playbook: Despite local ways of living that today might be described as queer or trans, when the British Empire named Uganda a colony in 1894, it criminalized queer sexuality by way of Penal Code Section 377, which punished "whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal.")

Amid a wave of anti-colonial resistance in Africa, Uganda shook Britain off in 1962. But over the course of six decades of independence, Uganda's presidency has been defined mostly by two men. 

Idi Amin, Uganda's third president, often cast as a brutal dictator in the West, is remembered, among other things, for expelling all British and 80,000 members of Uganda's Indian community. Locally, he is remembered as "Big Daddy." (Among those calling for recasting Amin as a more sympathetic anti-colonial figure is one of those Ugandans whom Amin expelled: Mahmood Mamdani, author of "Slow Poison: Idi Amin, Yoweri Museveni, and the Making of the Ugandan State" and father of the newly elected Uganda American New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani).

"Why have we been relying on the United States for 20 years? Why hasn't my government made this a priority for us?"

Museveni, Uganda's ninth president, has ruled since 1985, coinciding with the AIDS era. He quickly became a major face of Uganda's "ABC" approach to HIV: Abstain before marriage, be faithful in marriage and — if you fail at those two — use a condom. Ugandan HIV prevention workers who did not wish to be named for fear of persecution describe Museveni as indifferent to the crisis and having outsourced all responsibility to foreign funding. 

For instance, as one medical doctor put it, when PEPFAR began funding HIV medication in the early 2000s, "it was supposed to be an emergency plan. It's right there in the name," the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. "Why have we been relying on the United States for 20 years? Why hasn't my government made this a priority for us?"

As he managed to retain power for decades, Museveni increasingly turned a tactic of social control favored by political leaders from Vladimir Putin in Russia to Keir Starmer in England to Trump in the United States alike: Whipping up a moral panic about LGBTQ+ people. 

All of this history made it so that when public health workers in Uganda encountered what they called the "three disasters" of their recent history, it was hard to recover.

The first occurred on March 21, 2020, when the first Covid-19 case was reported in Uganda, which led to strict lockdowns that made HIV care very difficult to provide.

Related Progressives Use Pentagon Budget to Protest Outrageous Anti-LGBTQ+ Law

The second struck in the spring of 2023, with the passage of Uganda's Anti-Homosexuality Act. It made "aggravated homosexuality" punishable by death and "promoting homosexuality" — which could include gatherings of LGBTQ+ people, discussions to plan HIV prevention, and every meeting attended by The Intercept in reporting this story — punishable by up to 20 years in prison. The standard penalty for consensual same-gender sexual acts is life imprisonment.

The Anti-Homosexuality Act passed after evangelical missionaries from the United States spent years, and tens of millions of dollars, spreading homophobia in Africa in general and in Uganda specifically. Of the $54 million spent by more than 20 U.S. evangelical groups in Africa's 54 nations from 2007 to 2020 "to influence laws, policies, and public opinion against sexual and reproductive rights," about a third went to Uganda, according to OpenDemocracy.

And the third disaster came on November 5, 2024, when Trump was reelected. Not only did PEPFAR and USAID funds quickly disappear, but strict restrictions were also placed on the little aid that survived. For example, PrEP — pre-exposure prophylaxis, which prevents HIV infection — could no longer officially be given to those most at risk, such as sex workers or gay men, but only to pregnant and nursing mothers. 

And yet, despite the "three disasters," dedicated queer and trans Ugandans — many who could flee to exile to secure their own personal safety — refuse to give up trying to protect the health of their community, even as they're being crushed.

Things are so bad under Trump, some Ugandan health care providers are pining for George W. Bush. 

"George Bush Jr., is my best friend," Dr. Edith Namulema, chief of the HIV/AIDS Counseling and Home Care Department at Mengo Hospital in Uganda, told The Intercept. 

Over the sound of chirping tropical birds, Dr. Namulema spoke in a large, breezy part of her ward that is mostly used to treat patients with tuberculosis, who slept on the other side of thin blue curtains. Just outside was an adjacent clinic room with a roof but no walls for treating people with HIV, where patients were having their blood drawn by smiling young phlebotomists in dark blue scrubs.

Namulema never met Bush. But despite his global trail of destruction spurred by his war on terror — and his generally homophobic domestic agenda — such effusive praise for "Bush Jr." is common among African AIDS researchers and doctors.

Namulema has worked with HIV since the 1990s, before there were medications that prevented an HIV diagnosis from becoming a guaranteed AIDS death sentence. For years, she buried one patient after another. 

But when Bush made antiretroviral medication available circa 2001 via PEPFAR, she saw the deaths begin to slow within a week.

A nurse at Universal Love Alliance described a startling shift in the first year of Trump's second term. "I have seen people die with HIV before," she said. "But I rarely saw someone die because they could not adhere to their medications." Over the last decade, the nurse witnessed maybe one death per year due to a patient failing to take their medication. In 2025, she saw this happen 10 times.

Every nurse and HIV peer educator in a community clinic who spoke to The Intercept said they have seen an uptick in HIV-diagnoses and related deaths. Official statistics do not show this trend — sources say it's because they are not able to record "KP data." The Trump cuts have, predictably, caused a chaotic data scenario. The Uganda Ministry of Health predicts four Ugandans are becoming infected with HIV every hour. Meanwhile, the Uganda AIDS Commission reported a "sharp fall" in AIDS-related deaths of 64 percent to the Parliament in October. 

One doctor interviewed by The Intercept at a large hospital said they have not seen an increase in HIV positivity, but attributed it to the fact that "KPs are in hiding" and the hospital lost all funding to hire people to go where KPs dare to live. 

En route to a "KP clinic" in Kampala, The Intercept rode in a four-wheel-drive Toyota. The passengers included Samson, who fled his rural village town for Kampala when he realized the other boys were trying to burn him with acid because he was gay, and Kukunda Sharon, a former school instructor who goes by "Teacher" and "had to escape" her village when her lesbianism was met with an attempt to coerce her into a forced marriage; she is now associate director of Universal Love Alliance.

Even in Kampala's center near the U.S. Embassy — an intimidating imperial outpost that takes 10 minutes to drive around — the roads are not great, but at least they are paved. But as the SUV sloped downhill, it traveled onto rough red clay roads lined by open gutters of untreated sewage. The buildings grew lower, then came single-story metal roofed shacks, where people live largely without electricity or plumbing.

Nearly 7 million people live in Kampala, and yet the city has no functional train or bus system. Kampalans move about in "taxis" (minivans that seat 14, which LGBTQ+ people consider too dangerous), or on the back of "boda boda" motorbikes. Such movement is difficult for people who are sick and, given the high price of petrol, it is economically prohibitive; gas is roughly the same price as in the United States, even though the average income in Uganda is just about 1 percent of America's average income. People walk long distances on roads without sidewalks to get where they need to go — nearly impossible for sick people. 

Thus when it comes to treating HIV effectively, it is necessary to have many clinics spread throughout the city's poorest areas so that people living with HIV can come for their medical care, or have their medicine delivered. A year ago, the Ugandan Health Ministry announced it would be shutting all HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis clinics in the country. According to Sky News, one official said the closure of HIV clinics was a necessary response because of the loss of funding from USAID. Also shuttered were standalone pharmacies supplying antiretroviral drugs. Millions in Uganda, especially the more than 1 million people living with the virus, depend on these facilities to provide HIV treatments and preventative therapies. According to an International Planned Parenthood Federation survey published in December 2025, some 1,175 affiliated IPPF health sites closed across Africa, affecting 396 staff positions and 5.9 million clients due to the funding changes. Thousands of health workers in Uganda — including doctors, nurses, and community experts — have lost their jobs.

The Intercept visited one of the few "KP clinics" still operating, despite a government raid and threats of arrest for its staff. It sits in a compound behind a wall, just off of a busy street. It is extremely hot, without air conditioners or fans in any of the simple examination and testing rooms. 

Staff members from three of the remaining KP clinics gathered here to speak with The Intercept in a room that usually hosts group therapy, whenever a trustworthy volunteer therapist can be found.

At first, the conversation was taciturn. The meeting is technically illegal, the gathered medical workers weren't all familiar with each other there, and there are always worries in such get-togethers that someone might be a spy. But after sitting on the floor and eating samosas, "the boys" — as these young men refer to themselves and each other — begin to open up.

They talk about the cuts. At one clinic, salaries were reduced by 50 percent. At another, the staff was trimmed from 15 to just four — a medic there says he's wracked with survivor's guilt. He tells a common story: He was a preacher's son who knew he was different. It wasn't until he went to the clinic looking for sexual health information that he could even talk to anyone like himself. He fell into a global pattern in queer health — largely destroyed by Trump — in which someone goes to a clinic for services, then becomes a volunteer, then starts working there and helping others.

"It was the only place I could just be … me," he said, with a heavy sigh, indicating he did not have to hide appearing gay. He loved working with "the boys" and was gutted that 11 co-workers lost their jobs. Most of them, he said, still show up at the clinic and work unpaid for three reasons: "They have nothing else to do," "There is nowhere else to go for them to be themselves with other people," and "for food" available at the facility.

When people with little or no money have to choose between food and HIV medications, they will always choose food.

Two suddenly gregarious medical assistants (also both preachers' kids) talk with candor about their shared situation: Being gay meant both had to leave their families and their churches. One said he's still happy to go to work despite seeing his wages cut in half, but is dismayed that the cuts mean he simply cannot offer the care that clients need. The number of people they treat has plummeted. This is in part because USAID cuts took away money for the clinic's staff to make outreach tours to sex work and gay "hot spots." It's also because the clinic used to feed clients who came in for the treatment. The free food helped mitigate the cost to patients for traveling to the clinic and is necessary because HIV medications don't work for people who aren't consistently eating enough. (When people with little or no money have to choose between food and HIV medications, they will always choose food.)

"We used to give away bags of food two times a week," he said. "Now, we have only given it out two times this whole year, which is basically nothing."

The Trump-era cuts have pushed KPs out of other medical settings, he said, which makes them wary of trusting any medical care. When USAID money was flowing, he said, patients told him that they were tolerated when they sought care at a public hospital because the workers there knew they would be compensated. But since the cuts, "some of our patients tell us they've been told, 'There's no money in you now. Go away.'"

Referring people to get viral load tests — an important step in managing HIV care — has also become nearly impossible in Kampala. It's not just that the U.S.-financed health care workers who did the tests were laid off; some of them took the equipment with them when they left. 

Then, there's the issue of medication. The U.S. still pays for some antiretrovirals. But while The Intercept saw ample supplies of emtricitabine and tenofovir, the most common antiretrovirals, at most clinics visited, not everyone can take that treatment. When people fall out of treatment, they may grow resistant to specific medications and need a different combination should they survive long enough to restart medication in the future. But since the cuts, little aside from the common combo is available to treat HIV; doctors say it is almost impossible to get anything else. 

"When someone comes looking for something they need" and a clinic doesn't have it — whether it's food, medicine, or just a kind ear to listen to them — "they usually won't come back," one of the medical assistants said.

Then, they'll become infectious and HIV will move throughout their networks. 

The boys were already seeing bad trends. They used to see a positive HIV diagnosis every two or three months. Now they said they are seeing one a week.

Asked by The Intercept if they, or their patients, are able to use geolocation hookup apps like Grindr, the boys laugh.

"Yes," they answer.

"How?" 

"VPNs. People have needs."

"But how do you know someone isn't a cop?"

"You don't!"

"What can you rely on to lessen the chances he's a cop?"

"Luck!"

"Sometimes," another health worker chimes in, "a guy will meet another guy on Grindr, have sex with him, and then arrest him." In theory, this kind of undercover sting could lead to prosecution for "aggravated homosexuality," but mostly, cops do this for extortion, which is rampant. By the end of 2025, Uganda's Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum had "handled a total of 956 cases involving actions specifically targeting LGBTQ+ persons," which have affected 1,276 individuals, since the implementation of the Anti-Homosexuality Act in 2023.

And that fear of prosecution and harassment keeps people who may have HIV or even signs of cancer from seeking medical treatment. 

"Here, we do not tolerate trans people," said Gabbie, who is trans. "It is as simple as that." 

Ramahdan, the LGBTQ+ activist, along with Samson and Sharon of Universal Love Alliance, have set up a meeting with a dozen trans and gender-nonconforming people in a conference room at a hotel near the Gaddafi Mosque. It is not a "gay hotel" — no such thing exists in Kampala. It was chosen because it is trusted by the community to be friendly enough and discreet. Security is a huge concern for everyone. The trans Ugandans span late teens to mid-50s, and their body language reveals nervousness: Any time a waiter comes into the room through a swinging door, everyone falls silent until they leave. 

Their fear is understandable. A show of hands reveals everyone has been arrested at least once. At the municipal jail, they said they have been tortured (forced to strip and humiliated in front of all the other detainees), sexually assaulted (sometimes under the pretense of checking their gender, sometimes not), and even raped. A Muslim trans woman (who wears both a hijab and also a mask to protect against Covid) was arrested on her first-ever date with a man. (People in the room chuckles knowingly when she shares that the date did not intervene when the police took her away, and she never saw him again.)

When arrested, trans women are often put into men's holding area, at least initially; they are terrified of becoming infected with HIV from rape. Most everyone has been kicked out of their families of origin or lost jobs (usually when a relative has outed them).

Fear of being subjected to the "queer tax" — when a landlord charges more or an employer pays less under threat of outing — was universal in the group. One young trans man, not yet 20, cried when describing his fear to even leave his house. His landlord figured out he is trans and was trying to evict him, but he cannot move until he pays off the extortion money. (The group took a collection to pay off his debt.)

The extortion threat has only grown with the collapse of USAID. At a follow-up meeting at a Kentucky Fried Chicken a few days later, Gabbie arrived after an expensive two-hour journey on a trans-friendly boda boda. "You cannot afford for random drivers to know where you live," she said. (Another trans person The Intercept interviewed in a homeless shelter said they would take three boda bodas from home to work, switching rides like a spy to keep anyone from being able to trace her.) 

Gabbie has been pushed from her family to a queer church shelter, which was raided and evicted, to another group situation, that was also raided and evicted. She now shares a studio apartment with four trans women at the outskirts of Kampala. Their water and electricity are periodically turned off for non-payment, and they open the windows when they cook on a coal stove to avoid breathing carbon monoxide.

Gabbie dropped out of college when her family saw a video of her preaching in a queer-affirming church, cut her off, and told her never to come back. Six months later they invited her back, then locked the gate behind her; she was trapped in an exorcism and had to escape over the wall.

It was never easy to be trans in Uganda. Surgeries — even those performed abroad — are almost unheard of, and long before Trump it was difficult to source hormones. Since Trump's reelection, Gabbie has found that it's theoretically possible, if prohibitively expensive, to source hormones on the black market. There is the physical danger: Injecting hormones with unsterilized syringes from unverified sources without a doctor's supervision exposes trans people to HIV, hepatitis, and the possibility of dangerous, even lethal, side effects. But part of why Gabbie has stopped taking hormones and is now passing as a man in public is because sourcing hormones on the black market "opens you up to extortion" by anyone along the supply chain. She can't afford that. (While in the West, most trans people use the terms "passing" to refer to being accepted as their true gender, in much of Africa, many trans people use it to refer to "passing" for the gender assigned to them at birth.)

The cuts hit Gabbie's job at a trans-affirming nonprofit, where the staff was reduced from five people to just one: Gabbie. The office was abandoned, and she only works part-time, out of the studio she shares with four people. 

"It was very painful, returning to this body, this body I do not want." 

Gabbie is also a model, and hopes to feel free presenting as her true feminine self at least while at home with her roommates. But they've been raided doing that, too. On her phone, she showed The Intercept a series of photos. In the first few, she and her girlfriends are happy, decked out in high glam in their apartment. But in the last photo, in an image reminiscent of the 1969 Stonewall Riot arrest photos, she is crying in the back seat of a police car. Their house had been raided, presumably on a complaint from a neighbor. After six weeks in jail, she was released without charges. But the damage was done: She made the difficult decision to stop her transition — to "go stealth," as she put it, in public as a man.

"It was very painful," she said, "returning to this body, this body I do not want." 

She hopes one day to transition again. "You can't not be yourself 24 hours a day," she said, sniffling slightly, her eyes darting around the KFC, hoping no one would notice her tears or hear us. 

Two weeks later after the meeting at the Kampala KFC, Gabbie texts pictures of herself in a graduation robe. Without her family's help, it took her a few more years than she wanted. But she had graduated from university, with a degree in accounting — which she wants to use to secure more resources for LGBTQ+ work in Uganda.

Near a sex "hot spot," there is a clinic for sex workers. Inside the open garage door of a modest house, a half dozen sex workers were waiting for treatment. A medic draws a patient's blood. One patient bounced an infant gently to soothe its cries. Another laid her newborn gingerly on the floor on a blanket; he smiled up at all the faces smiling down at him.

Up until the Trump stop work order, this clinic was run by a team of 17, including medics, peer educators, and community health navigators. They went out and recruited patients, educated them on STIs, and followed up with people to keep them adherent on antiretrovirals. Ten people lost their jobs, and the number of medics dropped from 12 to five. Those who remain have seen steep pay cuts: Average earnings fell from 800,000 Uganda shillings a month (about $222 USD) to just 250,000 (about $70). 

As a "stud lesbian," one sex worker tells The Intercept, this kind of clinic is the only place "where I can ask a doctor about my needs." Most doctors assume she has sex with men, and until she sought out this clinic, she had no idea what was safe, or not, in her ways of having sex.

The situation for lesbian women in Uganda is dire. "You are forced into a marriage you do not want. You are forced into getting pregnant with a baby you do not want. In a body you don't want. And you cannot get an abortion, and so you are forced into having a baby and raising a child you do not want," said one queer sex worker. 

It has become harder to insist their customers use condoms — if they can even afford them.

Sex work has grown more difficult since the cuts. Beyond health expenditures, USAID paid for construction projects and conferences. "When people are in town for a conference, they have money to spend on entertainment: on restaurants, on hotels, on us," one sex worker put it. But USAID stopped most of that.

With laid-off people turning to sex work, more Ugandans are trying to sell sex to fewer customers. This is economically deleterious, making it harder for the workers to dictate the terms of their encounters. The result is that they have less power in the kinds of sex they are willing to have. It has become harder to insist their customers use condoms — if they can even afford them.

The clinic is struggling to keep up with their clients' urgent needs. There's a sudden lack of STI medication. HIV self-testing kits have become almost impossible to source, condoms are scarce, and lubricants "disappeared entirely," said the clinic's project manager.

"When you use too many men, you get dry," the project manner noted, "and you can't avoid the condom breaking." 

Related Trump Would Rather Let Birth Control Expire Than Give It to Africans as Aid

PrEP and birth control pills could theoretically help prevent HIV and pregnancy. Uganda adopted oral pre-exposure prophylaxis in 2016 and by the end of December 2023, over 550,000 clients had initiated the treatment. But since the cuts, PrEP is not officially available to most sex workers — only to pregnant women and nursing mothers. Birth control pills were paid for by USAID; now they are prohibitively expensive. 

Trump isn't alone in his policy of foreign austerity. The United Kingdom and the Netherlands, along with some private funders, have followed Trump's lead in cutting off any money to Uganda that might help trans people. (We document this funding crisis in our short film "A Visit to the Homeless Shelter for Trans Ugandans.")

There is some hope on the horizon for more foreign aid, but questions remain about how much of it will reach the country's so-called KPs. 

On December 10, the U.S. and Uganda signed "a five-year, nearly $2.3 billion bilateral health cooperation agreement that signifies the importance of the relationship between the two countries," in which "the United States plans to invest up to $1.7 billion to combat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis (TB), malaria and other infectious diseases across Uganda while helping strengthen Uganda's health system."

No one who spoke with The Intercept spoke expected this money could undo the lost trust, unemployment, and damage of the last year — nor did they expect such efforts to make their way to KPs. One public health activist, who did not want to be named for fear of persecution, claimed that "that money is not for health, it was given a month before the elections. That money was for elections." 

Dr. Peter Kyambadde, the senior program officer at the Ministry of Health, said, "Key populations still remain among the prioritized populations for epidemic control" but admitted that "how much of those resources will be committed to key populations" remains an open question. 

"They consider us criminals." 

Samson, of the Universal Love Alliance, did not believe any government resources will flow their way. "What you see Trump doing in the United States aligns with Uganda's goals. They consider us criminals." 

The potential return of U.S. health funding comes as an injectable form of PrEP that lasts for six months called was just approved for use in Uganda. The medication is considered a breakthrough in HIV prevention that, if distributed widely enough, has the potential to eradicate the virus.

But only 1,000 doses of the shot have been delivered to Africa, and none to Uganda. 

It costs $28,000 a year. A $40 generic version won't be ready until at least 2027. And the distribution channels in Uganda — namely the clinics where patients trust they could access such a drug without risk — have largely been undermined or destroyed. 

This essay is part of the series Global Stop Work Order, featuring reporting about how the Trump administration's cuts are affecting LGBTQ+ health and HIV/AIDS around the world. The series is supported by a Pulitzer Center Global Reporting Grant and the Fund for Investigative Journalism.

The post By Slashing Foreign Aid, Trump Is Fueling the Spread of HIV in Uganda appeared first on The Intercept.

All comments in this thread MUST be greater than 150 characters.

Example - Location: New Zealand

This ONLY applies to top-level comments, not replies to comments. You're welcome to make regionless or general observations, but you still must include 'Location: Region' for your comment to be approved. This thread is also [in-depth], meaning all top-level comments must be at least 150-characters.

Users are asked to refrain from making more than one top-level comment a week. Additional top-level comments are subject to removal.

All previous observations threads and other stickies are viewable here.

Since Apple finally put its mysterious and long-suffering Project Titan out to pasture, we've wondered what a Jony Ive-designed Apple Car might have looked like. Today, we might have a clue. This, though, is no Apple Car. It's the Ferrari Luce ("light" in Italian), the actual name for the EV formerly known as Elettrica, and I'm fresh from getting a walkthrough of the thing from Sir Ive himself. At a glance things look like you might have expected, but there are a few surprises here.

While Ferrari has sold hybrids in some form or another since 2013's LaFerrari, Luce (née Elettrica) will be the company's first all-electric machine. We got our first look underneath back in October, when we saw the chassis, battery pack and other details that pointed to this being a larger, more family-friendly machine than your average Ferrari. Last week, I got a look at the next major component, the interior, which comes courtesy of LoveFrom.

LoveFrom is the house that Jony Ive founded after leaving Apple in 2019. The obsessive design firm, which currently numbers about 60 employees, was acquired by OpenAI for $6.5 billion last year. LoveFrom has thus far taken on a medley of projects, like the $60,000 Linn Sondek LP12 turntable, but the Luce could be among the company's biggest projects so far — at least in terms of literal dimensions.

If you're familiar with the designs that Apple produced under Ive's tenure, particularly in the era beginning with the iPhone 4, you'll feel right at home here. The overall aesthetic is one dominated by squircles and circles, all with absolute, minute perfection and symmetry. 

At first blush, it's a bit clinical, but dig deeper, start poking and prodding, and you'll see there's a real sense of charm here. Fun little details and genuinely satisfying tactility begin to reveal themselves. The key, for example, has a yellow panel with an E Ink background. Push the key into the magnetized receiver in the center console, and the yellow on the key dims, moving across to glow through the top of the glass shifter. It's meant to symbolize a sort of transference of life.

The shifter isn't the only thing that's glass. There are 40-odd pieces of Corning Gorilla Glass scattered throughout the cockpit, everything from the shifter surround to the slightly convex lenses in the gauge cluster. What isn't glass is aluminum, much of it anodized in your choice of three colors: gray, dark gray and rose gold. 

Yes, all that sure does sound like I'm writing about a new iPhone and not the latest Ferrari. But where Apple has been pruning every physical control it possibly can from its devices lately, LoveFrom will insert some great tactility in the Luce. The shifter moves through its detents satisfyingly, the air vents open and close with a clear snick and the paddles behind the steering wheel pop with a great feel.

My favorite feature is the windshield wiper control, a little dial in the upper-right of the steering wheel face. It features a tiny lens that magnifies the current setting. It's actually magnifying one of four custom OLED panels, 200 ppi units from Samsung, cut and shaped to deliver LoveFrom's ornate style. 

The gauge cluster behind the steering wheel, or binnacle as it's more formally called here, is two OLED displays stacked on top of each other, with a physical needle sandwiched between serving as a pseudo-tachometer for this car without an engine. The gauges change and morph as you move from one mode to the next. 

The center display is a 10.12-inch OLED perforated with plenty of holes to allow some pleasingly chunky toggle switches through, plus a glass volume knob. The little clock in the upper-right can turn into a stopwatch or a compass, with its needles swinging about depending on the mode. The whole central control panel pivots and swivels. Just grab the big handle below and drag it where you want it. 

The attention to detail on everything is astonishing. Even the rails that hold the seats to the floor are gently shaped and anodized to match the rest of the interior. 

Ive was on hand to unveil the interior, clearly a little nervous about showing all this for the first time. After five years of working confidentially on this topic, Ive said he was "enormously excited" and "completely terrified" to provide our first real glimpse at the Luce. 

Marc Newson, who founded LoveFrom with Ive, said: "Jony and I share a really, really deep interest in automotive things and vehicles. Actually, I'd go so far as to say that that is probably a hobby of both of ours."

Both Ive and Newson own many vintage machines, and Ive said that modern cars "are missing some things that we love about our old Ferraris." Things like tactility. "It was very clear to us that we needed to figure out as many ways as possible to viscerally and physically connect to the interface," Ive said.

So, while the Luce does have that pivoting touchscreen, it's far from the vehicle's primary interface. Ive said he hopes that physical connection and all the clever touches create a uniquely charming vehicle. 

Ive told me that the LoveFrom team has genuinely enjoyed working with Ferrari. "It's been really lovely," he said, and he praised Ferrari CEO Benedetto Vigna's dedication to this project and where it might lead down the road. "Benedetto is an amazing engineer," he said, "he's really interested in what can be learned more broadly."

The biggest challenge might have been working within the automotive industry. Here, design, form and function are key, but safety is of the utmost importance. "It's very hard," Ive told me. "I've never worked in an area that's so regulated. Some of it's great, because you understand why, and people's safety is certainly important, but some of it drives you nuts."

It's far and away the most exciting and fresh interior I've seen outside of the ultra-rare machines like the $4 million Bugatti Tourbillon. But it's so clinically precise and refined that it lacks the rough and raw feel that typifies many classic Ferraris. Whether that's a good or a bad thing will be debated endlessly, and I look forward to reading your comments, but I do figure it'll go a long way to delivering the kind of new clientele that Ferrari must be targeting with the Luce. 

Ultimately, whether anyone will want one is hugely dependent on how good the rest of the car looks and how much it will cost. Those are questions we still can't answer, at least not until May, when CEO Vigna says we can expect the Luce's full reveal. 

For Ive, though, it seemed like that won't be the end of the road for this automotive journey. "At the end of a project, there are two products. There's what you've made, and there's what you've learned. I've always been fascinated by what you've learned," he told me. "And honestly, we've learned so much."