Keir Starmer's Home Office has blown nearly £700,000 on court and lawyer fees to oppose Palestine Action co-founder, Huda Ammori's judicial review. The review seeks to overturn the government's ban on the anti-genocide direct action group. In addition, Starmer has used the ban to arrest thousands of mostly elderly and disabled protesters for opposing it.

Human rights groups have condemned Starmer's police-state action, with Amnesty International describing it as a:

disproportionate misuse of the UK's terrorism powers [that] should be overturned.

The court's decision on the judicial review will be announced tomorrow, 13 February 2026.

This cost is nothing compared to the millions spent, since the ban began in July 2025, on arresting the activists who opposed the ban. Furthermore, then-home secretary Yvette Coooper was caught in repeated lies to justify the ban. UK security and intelligence experts had recommended against the ban.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

A High Court judge has ruled this morning, 13 February 2026, that the government's ban on anti-genocide action group Palestine Action was "disproportionate" and breaches the human rights of UK people.

Palestine Action NOT a terrorist group (obviously)

However, the 'proscription' remains in place for at least another week while the government has a chance to prepare submissions on the court's finding. It remains a criminal offence, for the time being, to express support for Palestine Action. Police should, of course, weigh whether it's worth arresting people when no prosecutions are likely, but their record suggests they won't.

Zack Polanski perhaps summed up the verdict the best:

A court has ruled that the government's authoritarian ban on Palestine Action was unlawful.

Time to stop criminalising the people protesting a genocide - and start ending the UK's complicity.

— Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski) February 13, 2026

Meanwhile, on the ground, supporters of Palestine Action were jubilant.

The decision was made by a panel of judges who all have strong links to Israel, underscoring just how far the Starmer regime overstepped human rights legislation. It is almost certain to try to appeal, despite the exposed web of lies it created to try to justify the ban.

Outside the court, supporters were holding signs saying "I support Palestine Action". These were the exact same ones that saw police people in their 1000s last year. Yet on 13 February, as far as the Canary team on the ground could tell no one was today:

The full judgment is available here.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

In recent decades, a huge wave of dental tourism has been expanding worldwide, driven by people seeking quick solutions to their dental problems. Today, social, professional, and personal approval play a significant role in how we are perceived, and a perfect smile is essential for fitting into a society where the growth of the internet and social media has increased the pressure to present a beautiful and confident image.

Taking care of your teeth, keeping them white, and so on has become just as important as any other cosmetic surgery on our bodies. People look for the best deals and the best dentists in a single clinic, dental tourism has become a great option in recent years, when patients cannot find what we mentioned in their countries of origin.

The most popular countries for dental tourism are:

●  Türkiye: Without a doubt, this wonderful country has become a great option in Europe because it offers packages for tourists not only to visit exotic and historical places but also to enjoy its dental services at an affordable price.

●  Mexico: In Latin America and the North, this country is a great option since dental procedures are very expensive in places like Canada and the United States.

●  Vietnam: This country is ideal in the Asian part because they train excellent professionals and are ideal for offering good prices without lowering quality standards.

There are also other ideal countries for dental tourism, such as Costa Rica, Colombia, Dubai, Poland, among others.

What are the most sought-after dental procedures in the world?

• ORTHODONTICS: Undoubtedly, crooked or gapped teeth are among the biggest factors that lower a person's mood and dental aesthetics. Orthodontics is an ideal procedure to correct these types of problems, as well as bite malformations. It involves placing a series of metal appliances that, over the months, gradually tighten the teeth and move them into their correct position.
• TEETH WHITENING: It is one of the most used procedures since most people in the world suffer from tooth stains at least once in their lives for various reasons, whether the most common ones, such as not having proper oral hygiene or the consumption of tobacco, cigarettes, tea, or mate, among others. Sometimes it turns into tartar and this can only be removed by the doctor using special equipment.
• DENTAL IMPLANTS: When we lose one or more teeth, it's possible to replace them through this procedure, which, although more complex, is a valid option. A screw is placed in the tooth root, and once the osseointegration process is complete, a custom-made prosthesis, matched to the natural tooth colour, is then attached.
• DENTAL CROWNS: They are used after the implant and act in place of the missing tooth, they are made of a biocompatible material with the mouth, they are made to measure for each patient, they are made with the natural color of the tooth and they are placed permanently, the patient automatically recovers the aesthetic and chewing function of the mouth.
• DENTAL VENEERS: These are "caps" so called because of their manufacturing method, which cover imperfections of natural teeth such as stains, cracks, crooked teeth, etc. They are made in the same color and help to make the smile beautiful and perfect.
• HOLLYWOOD SMILE: It is undoubtedly most sought after by those who practice dental tourism; its name is derived from the way famous people in film and television have a beautiful and enviable smile. The professionals provide individual assistance to each patient when it comes to this treatment, as each one is evaluated and given the procedures they need to achieve a Hollywood smile.

These are just some of the many dental procedures performed in various clinics, where patients go with the assurance of receiving top-quality care at competitive prices. Among the outstanding clinics, we must mention the dental clinic called Dentakay, located in Istanbul, Turkey, famous for its excellent price packages that include not only treatment but also pre- and post-treatment services, as well as the opportunity for patients to explore historical sites in the country, thus enhancing their dental tourism experience.

By Nathan Spears

'Lady' Victoria Hervey — ex-partner to disgraced Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor — went on LBC to smear the late Virginia Giuffre, who serial child-rapist Jeffrey Epstein abused for years before she lost her life to suicide in 2025.

Unrepentant

Giuffre dedicated her life campaigning against sexual abuse. Despite that, Windsor, notwithstanding his position in the royal family, denied having had a relationship or contact with Giuffre. The release of the 'Epstein files' revealed the disgraced ex-royal to be the dishonest party. He did know her and the infamous image of them was not doctored as claimed.

Hervey's interview charade mirrors Andrew's unrepentant mindset. Hervey, dismisses these events as a storm-in-a-teacup of lies that were 'unravelling.'

It gets worse, with Hervey claiming that:

just before [Virginia] passed away her lies were unravelling. ​Like, finally people were kind of realizing 'okay, this girl is making up stories,' and then she conveniently dies.

Challenged on who Giuffre's death was convenient for, she said it was:

Convenient for her.

This is not her first defence of Andrew. But tolerance for anyone cheering for rapists or excusing statutory rape is wearing thin — even the insufferable Piers Morgan shut down Hervey in a recent interview, describing her theories as as "utter s***".

It should be astounding, but isn't, given the context of the contempt shown for Epstein's countless victims by their abusers. Nor given the establishment's ongoing contempt now for their lives, reputations and the justice they deserve. Nor indeed Hervey's own history of responding to Giuffre's death with "lies catch up with you".

But Hervey wasn't finished. She also wanted to pour scorn on the horror decent humanity feels at the string of revelations of the rich and powerful and their sick crimes. According to Hervey, being in the files isn't shameful. Not being in the files is — it means you're "a bit of a loser":

To be honest, if you're not in those files it would be an insult, because it just means that you were a bit of a loser.

And Hervey just doubled down when she was challenged. In an interview shortly after her vile comments, she told Piers Morgan subsequently that she meant anyone "in the upper echelons of society" would be in Epstein's files:

https://www.thecanary.co/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/hervey-morgan-epstein.mp4 More questions than answers

Certainly, there are a handful of people in the files who aren't tainted by their appearance in the Epstein files. Anti-Zionist academic Norman Finkelstein came out shining, after the files showed him telling an academic who defended Epstein that Epstein and his lawyer Alan Dershowitz should be strangled.

But not the disgraced Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. Not the string of sick billionaires and politicians who participated in Epstein's crimes. And perhaps not Hervey either. She appears some thirty times in the latest Epstein release — and not in a 'passing mention' way either. None of it is proof of wrongdoing. None of it is incidental, either. All of it raises questions.

For example, in a frantic email to Giuffre's lawyer David Boies last year, a redacted whistleblower correspondent accused an "OUT OF CONTROL" Hervey of running a " serious gang of coordinated stalkers" to doxx and pursue them:

Or, in another example, seemingly from the same person:

Ward celebrated with HERVEY and KRAUS the night [redacted]'s death. They will not be satisfied until I am dead as well.

I have already served HERVEY and need to serve KRAUS. HERVEY uses the felon on parole, George B Tonks, to harass me full time since she no longer legally can. I had to hire a barrister in UK to serve Lady Victoria HERVEY, and did so [because] of the way [redacted] was being pummeled publicly by this gang. The guy was on parole as a convicted federal felon and I'm a federal whistleblower, so they did nothing. Vanity Fair gave a felon in prison my phone number and said felon NEVER STOPPED THREATENING AND HARASSING. The NYPD, Chicago PD, and FBI have failed us all and now I have been so beaten down the last five years without an ounce of support aside from fellow victims…

…HERVEY speaks to Maxwell in prison. Why is any of this harassment of witnesses legal and always overlooked?

One file includes an email with a redacted sender and no mention of the recipient's identity:

You use ppl with no support systems and make them carry the weight of unimaginable power and retribution! I begged you and SIGRID YEARS to protect NM/me from LADY VICTORIA HERVEY, as you gaslighted having never heard of the royal stalkers! Fergie and Maxwell are behind all of the suffering. LAW ENFORCEMENT IS
NOT HERE FOR VICTIMS. They arc here for elites.

Another Epstein file shows Hervey being accused publicly of being an "MI6 honeypot operative" close to Trump's FBI director Kash Patel. The image used shows a redacted Hervey with Patel, wearing a 'MAGA' cap. Patel is accused by senior US congresspeople of trying to cover up Trump's involvement with Epstein.

Finger-pointing

Another DOJ file shows a chat between an unnamed sender and "Lisa Probation for Stalker", accusing Hervey of participating in illegally-obtained medical information:

Another file:

[Redacted] needs to be restrained legally and once again, I wasn't given enough compensation to even cover my
upcoming surgeries. I had to serve HERVEY in the UK, PREDMORE, etc…how am I to survive? BEDWARDS, you did ALL OF THIS to my tiny private life.

Another, to lawyer Ariel Mitchell, accused Hervey and others of working with the Trump administration, Ghislaine Maxwell's family and the royal to destroy the sender:

Ariel,

He's a felon on parole who was just released in NYC from his ankle monitor. His probation officer had promised
he would not go free, yet LV HERVEY used her "influence", as they continue to try to kill me with threats/harassment/lies/smears/releasing my home address, sharing my ss#, sharing my [redacted] trauma journal!

They work in tandem with this current administration/Maxwell/Royal family.

Another, an email to Boies and others:

They gang stalk and HERVEY/Kraus have eyes set on attacking [musician P] Diddy victims next. FBI JUST WATCHES AS WE ARE EATEN ALIVE! Six full years.

Another, from a UK citizen to an unnamed Met Police detective, describes Hervey as "besotted" with Epstein's enabler and fellow trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, and demands a 'restraining order' against her:

I would like it noted that LVH [Hervey] has many friends as politicians as per her Daily Mail interview.

Again I want a restraining order filed against her. She is NOT a journalist but someone whom is besotted with Maxwell a convicted pedophile charged with sex trafficking who participated in my OWN TRAFFICKING AND HER OWN EGO!!!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14511171/Samantha-Landry-Victoria-Secret-excitement-Trump-MAGA-influencer.html

I WANT ALL HER LETTERS TO MAXWELL CONFISCATED AND USED AS EVIDENCE. ALSO ALL CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN YOURSELF LUCIA AND LVH MUST BE SENT TO DC [redacted] INCLUDING ALL OF [redacted] EVIDENCE YOU STOLE!!

AGAIN MAY I REMIND YOU ALL THAT THIS IS AN INTERNATIONAL SEX TRAFFICKING RING!!!!

I also have have photos of Ghislaine with myself and others in Epstein Island.

See [redacted] email below. I expect you will also contact her because I want every single communication she had with Lucia Osbom and Lady Victoria Hervey!

An implicated Daily Mail

Another, heavily redacted file includes an email sent to Daily Mail owner Jonathan Harmsworth, Viscount Rothermere. The email, apparently sent by a trafficked Epstein victim, informs Harmsworth that s/he is adding him to the witness list in "litigation and investigations into Epstein and Co", specifically, among other issues, because Hervey writes for his publication:

Jonathan Harmsworth,

I will be adding you to my witness list in the ongoing litigation and investigations into Epstein and Co where you personally will be held accountable for aiding and abetting Epstein's sex trafficking ring, victim-blaming and discrediting Epstein's victims to aid further those who committed and are committing heinous crimes of rape and sex trafficking accountable.

Seeming as Daniel Bates, Callahan, Lucia Osborne, Victoria Hervey, Alan Dershowitz, and Boris Johnson are enthusiastic journalists of your or in other z class stations, you to will be investigated along with Rupert Murdoch and The New York Post. Because of Callahan, I had to go into isolation and hiding for two years, and you all
put my life in danger when Epstein located me in Barcelona.

It was Sharon Churcher, a Daily Mail journalist who went down to see with a photographer and took her and her husband to the FBI in Sydney. It was the Daily Mail that Published the photo of Prince Andrew.

Over the years, how many millions/ billions have you made plugging the Prince Andrew story? I even made complaints directly to the Daily Mail many, many times at the unfair constant plugging of only one male being held accountable in an entire sex trafficking ring. Why has not one journalist held another man in the Epstein ring accountable?? NOT ONE???

Again, none of these appearances are proof of wrongdoing. But they certainly raise questions about Hervey's evident contempt for rape victims and survivors, including Giuffre.

For more on the the Epstein Files, please read the Canary's article on way that the media circus around Epstein is erasing the experiences of victims and survivors.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Threads users have complained about its recommendation algorithm since the dawn of time 2023. Users even started writing posts addressed to the algorithm, specifying the topics they wanted to see more of. Now, that's part of the system: Users can write a post that begins with "dear algo" to adjust their preferences, officially.

For example, you could write: "Dear algo, show me more posts about sous vide recipes." You can also ask to see fewer posts about topics you don't want to see, like "Dear algo, stop showing me posts about air fryers." You can even retweet other users' "dear algo" posts to have those topics reflected in your feed. "Dear algo" posts will work for Threads users in the US, UK, Australia and New Zealand, with more countries coming "soon."

— Mat Smith

The biggest stories in tech you might have missed.

• The first Control Resonant gameplay trailer shows a sideways NYC 

• Apple's Siri relaunch is reportedly behind schedule 

• The next Metal Gear Solid remaster collection arrives this summer

Elon Musk's latest scheme is a satellite catapult on the MoonI think that's a Drag Race song.

With a bigger focus on the Moon, Elon Musk is making some wild new plans. According to audio heard by The New York Times, Musk said xAI needed to build an AI satellite factory on the Moon with a gigantic catapult to launch the satellites into space. Sometimes you just want to be the Bond villain.

"You have to go to the Moon" to build the required AI capabilities, Musk told employees. "It's difficult to imagine what an intelligence of that scale would think about, but it's going to be incredibly exciting to see it happen." Such a catapult would certainly need to be powerful — though the Moon has only one-sixth Earth's gravity, the minimum escape velocity required for orbit is still around 3,800 mph, or five times the speed of sound. That's currently possible with electromagnetic railguns, but the satellites would have to withstand that force.

Continue reading.

Pokémon Pokopia is cosy AFStardew Valley + Animal Crossing X Pokémon.TMANintendo

In a bid to distract from a lot of things, Nintendo's new Pokémon game is a gently paced game where, instead of playing as a generic trainer, you take control of a sole Ditto. 

As a Ditto, you can transform into other Pokémon, though the process is sort of incomplete, meaning you can only learn one skill from the monsters you befriend. Instead of using tools, you can transform into other Pokémon (like Lapras or Dragonite) to use their abilities to traverse obstacles or shape the world around you.

Continue reading.

Sony WF-1000XM6 headphones reviewFacing tougher competition.TMAEngadget

Sony unveiled the latest entry in its best wireless earbud series, the WF-1000XM6, featuring yet another redesign, both inside and out. Once again, strong features and audio performance remain, but competition from all sides is tougher than ever. As Billy Steele explains in his review, if you want the strongest active noise cancellation, that will be Bose's QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds. If the best sound quality is your goal, the Technics AZ100 is your best bet in this price range. I'll also mention Sennheiser's Momentum True Wireless 4, which offers great sound quality, respectable ANC and a comfier fit than the M6. The WF-1000XM6 is available now for $330.

Continue reading.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/general/the-morning-after-meta-turned-threads-algorithm-complaints-into-an-official-feature-121500663.html?src=rss

Names, addresses, bank account numbers accessed - but biz insists passwords and call data untouched

The Netherlands' largest mobile network operator (MNO) has admitted that a breach of its customer contact system may have affected around 6.2 million people.…

Attorney General Pam Bondi testified before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, defending the Justice Department's widely criticized rollout of the Epstein files against accusations that her department is shielding powerful men, including President Donald Trump, at the expense of survivors. 

Democrats, who reviewed the unredacted files for the first time this week, revealed that the names of "wealthy, powerful men" were improperly redacted, while the names of victims were left exposed. 

This week on The Intercept Briefing, co-hosts Jessica Washington and Akela Lacy gave their rundown of the politics stories they're watching right now. Washington also spoke with Spencer Kuvin, an attorney representing nine of Epstein's victims, about the failures of the Department of Justice to protect survivors. 

"From the beginning of this case, the government, both from a state and federal level, have been trying to bury this, cover it up, and avoid any full exposure of the extent of the operation that was involved here," Kuvin said, "and they're doing it … because of all the both political, wealthy, and powerful individuals who were involved with Epstein and knew what was going on with these young women." 

Kuvin also spoke about the DOJ's failure to redact the names of victims in the files, including two of his clients who were victimized as children. "The current Department of Justice has a focus on something different than victims and helping victims and prosecuting bad people that victimize these young girls," he said. "Their focus instead appears to be on the important people — powerful people that are contained within these files and protecting them instead of protecting who needs the protection, the young victims in this case."

Listen to the full conversation of The Intercept Briefing on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen. 

Transcript 

Jessica Washington: Welcome to The Intercept Briefing. I'm Jessica Washington, politics reporter at The Intercept.

Akela Lacy: And I'm Akela Lacy, senior politics reporter at The Intercept.

JW: We're going to be doing something a little bit different this week and start off the show by discussing the topics that are on our mind as political reporters. Akela, what do you have your eye on this week?

AL: The midterms are here. There has been an onslaught of news this week from New York to Illinois to New Jersey — where after days of tearing my hair out, waiting for them to finalize the election results in the special election in New Jersey, 11 — it appears that the pro-Israel lobby strategy backfired and helped elect a progressive critic of Israel. So we've been writing about that. 

We also had done some reporting on AIPAC donors backing the Lieutenant Governor Tahesha Way in that race. And it appears that she is now potentially thinking about running against the winner Analilia Mejia in the next primary, which unfortunately is not that far away because there will be another race for the full term for this seat.

On Thursday, we published a story about a new endorsement in Illinois, where over the last week there's been several ads, millions of dollars spent in four races, where AIPAC is making one of its biggest investments this cycle. Our story is about a candidate in the ninth district, Kat Abughazaleh, who is now running with the endorsement of Justice Democrats and a new pro-Palestine political action committee that launched on Wednesday and is endorsing several candidates in the upcoming midterms.

Related Kat Abughazaleh on the Right to Protest

JW: Can you tell me a little bit about AIPAC strategy and how they're viewing the midterms?

AL: Yeah, so we've done a lot of reporting on this. Basically the 2024 midterms, AIPAC was extremely loud and vocal about its endorsements, its investments in these races, and there has been sort of a groundswell in criticism of AIPAC. Lots of groups popping up. I think we've seen a big shift in the number of people in the general public who are paying really close attention to how this lobby is operating in these midterms.

And in response to that, AIPAC has retreated to the way that it operated before it started spending directly on elections and launching the Super Pac and the regular PAC that many people are familiar with now, distancing itself from candidates, directing donors to fundraise for candidates that it hasn't publicly endorsed. On the other hand, you have candidates who are fundraising with AIPAC or aware that they're receiving tens of thousands of dollars from big AIPAC donors are saying that they're not seeking the endorsement of this group that they're not involved, that they're happy to take support from whoever wants to support their campaigns. And so this has made reporting on this a little bit more difficult in some ways because we're looking at donors where they overlap between these two groups.

We're trying to read between the lines of statements that officials and the group are making about whether or not they're involved in this race. And, in Illinois in particular, as I was interviewing Kat Abughazaleh on Wednesday evening, she said, AIPAC knows how toxic it is and that's why it's trying so hard to make it appear that it's not involved in this race when it very clearly is. And that I think is an evergreen statement about how it's operating in lots of races that are coming up. 

Jessie, I know you're also focusing on the midterms. What do you have your eye on right now?

JW: Yeah. First I have my eye on all of your reporting because it's been excellent.

AL: [Laughs.] Thank you.

JW: You have been writing a lot and really interestingly on AIPAC, so I've definitely been following your coverage. 

I think for me, ICE is really something I'm watching going into the midterms. In my conversations with campaigns candidates and their teams are bringing up ICE over and over again.

They recognize that part of what this election is going to be about is what kind of country we want to live in, and people are really rejecting the violence that they're seeing really publicly. Obviously, ICE and the Department of Homeland Security has been acting in ways that are violent towards communities in much quieter ways for years. But this violence that people are seeing, they're really rejecting. So I'm seeing a lot of traction with that, with campaigns.

And I think it's also an interesting juxtaposition with everything that's gone on with the Epstein files. This week and last week, you're really seeing this idea of conservatives as protectors of the innocent protectors of the weak, the ways that they've been trying to champion themselves to voters fall apart, both with the ways in which voters can see that they're not protecting the survivors connected to the Epstein files, and also the ways in which they're seeing that the authoritarianism that they have justified on the backs of, "hey, we have to protect the weak and vulnerable" is fake. So that's something I'm really watching, for campaigns to touch on.

AL: And I just think it's important to note here that Analilia Mejia, who you know, was elected in New Jersey as we were talking about, made that a cornerstone of her campaign. And like I know her campaign was really pushing that information out to reporters, that something that was so successful was that they were doing these ICE trainings at her campaign events — she was a critic of Israel. She was a supporter of all these progressive policies. But that specifically — the ICE issue — was what was resonating with voters in this district that was represented by a Republican before Mikie Sherrill was elected in 2019. So in terms of this everlasting quest to unite people across the ideological spectrum, it seems like that is being really effective.

JW: Yeah, it's definitely a message that we're seeing campaigns latch onto and we're seeing the public latch onto. And what you just said about the trainings, I've found to be so interesting, just the ways in which people have — despite being really afraid; I think it's rational to be afraid when we're seeing the kinds of violence publicly on video — but instead of just staying inside of their house, we're seeing people really resonate with this moment, go out, do these trainings, get into the streets, and that energy is something a lot of campaigns are trying to harness.

Now, whether or not they turn on that same energy, the ways in which we saw the George Floyd energy, which had been harnessed by Democrats and they really lost that momentum. It'll be curious to see if Democrats can hold onto the momentum from activists on the streets who are angry about ICE or whether we're going to see that exact same kind of turn we saw on organizers and activists who are connected to the George Floyd protests.

AL: Also this week I'm sure people were paying attention to the electric Pam Bondi hearing and the Epstein files. Jessie, you spoke to Spencer Kuvin, an attorney representing nine of Epstein's survivors.

JW: Yeah, I did. It was a really great conversation. Spencer drove home the ways in which the Trump justice apartment has been protecting the powerful at the expense of the victims in this case.

AL: Let's hear that conversation.

JW: Spencer, welcome to The Intercept Briefing.

Spencer Kuvin: Thank you so much for having me today.

JW: I want to start off by asking how the women that you represent are reacting to this latest batch of documents.

SK: Well, and thank you for asking about the victims, which really is the focus or should be the focus of everything that has been going on for the last 20 years.

Unfortunately, I had to make a very difficult call after the documents had been released. One of my clients, actually two of my clients were unfortunately unredacted and disclosed in those documents that included the first victim that came forward to police— the 14-year-old that I represented back in 2007, who the federal government was well aware of.

And another young victim who was 16 at the time that she was brought to Epstein's home in Palm Beach, they were both disclosed in these documents, unredacted. So I had to make that awful call to let them know that they had been disclosed and that I had notified the Department of Justice of what had happened.

And then thankfully within a day the redactions took place. But it's just unbelievable the failures of this Department of Justice.

JW: Yeah. Why do you think we saw such sloppy redactions in these files?

SK: I think you saw the sloppiness because of the lack of focus on what was important, and that was the victims.

I think unfortunately, the current Department of Justice has a focus on something different than victims and helping victims and prosecuting bad people that victimize these young girls. Their focus instead appears to be on the important people — powerful people — that are contained within these files and protecting them instead of protecting, who needs the protection, the young victims in this case.

JW: You're talking about someone who was abused at 14 years old, and I guess my question for you is just what does that re-traumatization look like when you're publicly outed in this way?

SK: It's awful. It's absolutely devastating. This is a young lady, for example, that chose to remain anonymous and wanted to move on with her life. And because of the drip of information over the last 20 years with respect to Epstein, she hasn't been able to move on with her life. She is now someone who is in her thirties and has a family of her own. And really does not want to have to look back at this dramatic and awful period of her life. And remaining anonymous allowed her to do that. And unfortunately the federal government is re-traumatizing these victims by making them have to go back through this awful period.

JW: Spencer, you've been working on this case for roughly 20 years. Can you give us some of the background, particularly on the sweetheart deal that Epstein got originally?

SK: Yeah, so I started working on these cases when victim number one, the first victim to go to the police in Palm Beach, walked into my office and needed help because she had, along with her parents, reported what had happened to her at Epstein's home. And that really started the snowball of this entire investigation for all of the future victims that came forward in the FBI investigation.

But what it started as was a local investigation by the town of Palm Beach, and Joe Recarey was the lead officer that I met with during that initial investigation. It was only after the state attorneys in Palm Beach refused to prosecute this case that it ended up at the FBI and the Southern District of Florida.

Then the FBI took over this case and started the prosecution and had an indictment that we now see that they've revealed unsealed that had almost 50 counts against Epstein and other potential co-conspirators that they shelved. And they shelved it because they entered into an awful, awful sweetheart deal with Epstein at the time.

That Epstein sweetheart deal was never provided to the victims. As an attorney on behalf of one of the victims, I had to fight in court just to see the crappy deal that they had entered into with Epstein and the immunity that they had given others. And that fight lasted a year in the litigation before I was able to even see it. And then once I saw it, I realized why they didn't want anyone to see it because it was such an awful deal.

JW: There are some truly horrifying allegations inside of these files, but so far there haven't been any high-profile arrests or charges brought. I think you're uniquely qualified to speak on this. What does justice look like here for the victims, and is it going to have to come from outside of the legal system?

SK: That's a good question and a very difficult one. In handling these types of cases, specifically the Epstein cases over the last 20 years, I get a lot of calls that are just not credible.

And unfortunately there is a mental health crisis in the United States and unfortunately, some of the people that have some issues will call in and make allegations that just factually don't hold water. Having said that, there are a lot of very valid tips that deal with individuals. So the FBI just seemed to categorize all of the tips that came in as not credible without even investigating them. And that's a problem.

In addition to that, Epstein entered into the sweetheart deal with the federal government as a result of the initial prosecution here in West Palm Beach in South Florida. And when they did that there were four co-conspirators that were clearly named in that agreement.

Four people that the federal government knew had assisted in the sex trafficking that Epstein was involved in. And by the way, one of those four was not Ghislaine Maxwell. She was not even named in the sweetheart deal at all. Most people don't realize that there were four other people, four other women, that were part of this conspiracy that have never been prosecuted to the state.

So the victims want them prosecuted. That's number one. There is enough information to prosecute those people and bring them to justice. Number two, they want this information out in the public so that the public can then see the full extent of this heinous operation that was going on for years. And then judge who they want to be running these important companies, corporations, in politics and whatnot, and have the public judge them for what they did, or what they didn't do, and then have them be held publicly accountable.

JW: I want to talk about these redactions again and the ways in which powerful people have been shielded as you've been just discussing now. Members of Congress were able to view the unredacted files this week. Before we get into some of the shocking revelations, I just wanted to ask you about the use of redactions to protect powerful people within the files and what you make of that, and what the women that you represent make of that.

"How do we hold the Department of Justice accountable for breaking federal law? … [W]ithout a penalty clause in the law, the only way to do that is contempt of Congress."

SK: It breaks the law. It violates federal law. The Department of Justice broke the law, and they are continuing to break the law. Make no question about this. The Epstein Transparency Act is very clear. You can read it. It is only about two pages long, and it states that no redactions shall be made for the purpose of merely embarrassment or protecting important or powerful people. In addition, it gives a deadline for the full disclosure of records. Both of those things have been violated by the Department of Justice. 

The question really is just accountability at this point. How do we hold the Department of Justice accountable for breaking federal law? That's a quandary that unfortunately, or fortunately, our country has not had to deal with yet. But right now we have to figure out a way to be able to hold the Department of Justice accountable. And I think legally speaking right now without a penalty clause in the law, the only way to do that is contempt of Congress.

JW: So on Tuesday, representative Ro Khanna revealed the names of these six, powerful, wealthy men, whose names had previously been redacted in the files. Those names included billionaire, former Victoria's Secret owner Les Wexner and Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem. What did those new names add to our understanding of Epstein and his world?

SK: I can tell you Les Wexner name was connected with Jeffrey Epstein, even back during the original prosecution of these cases I was involved in 2007. We were well aware of Epstein's connections with Wexner, and he was on our witness list as somebody, as a person of interest, that needed to be talked to or subpoenaed for a deposition.

Now the case is resolved before we got to that point. But the connection was clear even back then, and I think there were stories that came out in the news dating back into the late 2000s that identifies that connection.

The other wealthy, important and powerful people who were out outed in some of these records that shows the world the breadth —the true worldwide breadth —of Epstein's conspiracy and sex trafficking. And I think that there was a lot of rumor that had circulated for years, and people would call other individuals who would talk about those rumors as conspiracy theorists and crazy. And, you're making up crazy stories.

What we're seeing with these documents is that that is the reality that wealthy and powerful men around the world were trading young girls like trading cards.

JW: I should note here that Wexner's legal representative issued a statement saying "The Assistant U.S. Attorney told Mr. Wexner's legal counsel in 2019 that Mr. Wexner was neither a co-conspirator nor target in any respect. Mr. Wexner cooperated fully by providing background information on Epstein and was never contacted again." 

I just want to get into the conspiracy element of this because I think it's important. There's been so much talk about how these files have validated conspiracy theories, like QAnon, but in my opinion, there's been far less discussion about the ways in which these files have validated the accounts of women who were abused by Epstein as children and have been speaking about it, frankly, for years.

What would it have meant to listen to these women when they spoke out instead of waiting for a trove of government documents?

SK: Huge. It's huge from an emotional standpoint a victim goes through a huge emotional trauma just reporting what she has been through or he has been through. Latest government statistics show that one out of every three women, literally, if you are in the room with three women, one of them was likely subjected to some kind of sexual trauma in their life, and one out of every five men, by the way, also according to government statistics.

"A victim goes through a huge emotional trauma just reporting what she has been through or he has been through."

And what happens is that these young women, for example, in this case, that report this, when they're met with denials, accusations, attacks, all it does is drive them deeper into a depression because they know the truth. I think what it teaches us as a society is that we have to believe victims and what they're telling us because it takes a huge amount of bravery to even come forward and report these types of things. 

I think that if that had occurred, if people had believed victims, then they would've been able to work through the healing process. Part of what I do as an advocate for victims in the civil arena is I listen to victims and I believe them.

I then fight for them based upon that belief. And just that alone can help a victim knowing that there is someone out there that's fighting for them, believing in them, and wanting to get them justice. So being a part of the system and finding an advocate for them that is a very significant thing.

Look at, for example, Virginia Giuffre. She, for years, for years had been called a liar. And we are now seeing the absolute proof that everything she was telling us was true. She may not have unfortunately committed suicide had she been able to be believed and supported as a true victim.

[Break]

JW: I want to turn towards Donald Trump because obviously he casts a large shadow over the story. On Tuesday, Maryland Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin claimed that Donald Trump appears in the Epstein files more than a million times. He also said that Trump never asked Jeffrey Epstein to leave Mar-a-Lago as he previously claimed. What is your response to these revelations?

SK: I think it's important to look at these documents within the context of what they are and the timeframe within which they were gathered. These documents were gathered after the FBI began their operation, which was around 2007. We know historically that Epstein and Trump were friends. He's admitted that, and they were friends for years. But that friendship predated a lot of this investigation.

So a lot of the information we're seeing in these files is after the 2007 period when the investigation began. What we're not seeing is the extent of that relationship and what Trump may or may not have done with Jeffrey Epstein before 2007. We know because we've seen videos of them at parties and socializing together. He admitted that he knew that he liked young girls. And Trump now is trying to obviously distance himself as far as he can from Jeffrey Epstein.

But the reality is that there was a close connection, there was a good friendship. They did go to parties together. And this is something that the FBI never fully investigated. And unfortunately, given the fact that Trump is now the President and it seems as though he has a tight grip on the Department of Justice, I don't know that there will be a full and complete investigation of his activities.

JW: I think Donald Trump complicates this story in so many ways because at its core, this is a story about the violent sexual exploitation of children, and we have to hold space for that. But it's also a political story because of Donald Trump's involvement. So I guess, how do you think about holding space for what these women have gone through as children, while also acknowledging the politics involved here?

SK: Yeah, I agree with you. I think that politics definitely complicates the issue, but we have to remember that Donald Trump is the one that actually brought this to the forefront. We have to thank him to a certain extent because during his campaign he made this a major issue as part of his campaign that he was going to release this information.

It was only after he was elected and realized what was actually in those documents, that he then started backpedaling on the release of information to the general public. Politics always complicates truth because politicians seem to have a very difficult time just being truthful with the general public.

We have to always remember that the Department of Justice is supposed to be neutral. They are not supposed to be a political arm of any political party, whether it be Democrats or Republicans. Unfortunately, Donald Trump has turned our Department of Justice into a political animal, and as we saw, for example, through the testimony of Pam Bondi the other day in front of Congress. The Department of Justice no longer has any credibility as a nonpolitical or apolitical organization. They are political, without a doubt. It is now controlled by the president and the executive branch, and that's a shame because now victims cannot trust even our own Department of Justice to investigate crimes and do the right thing.

JW: As you've just mentioned, Attorney General Pam Bondi testified before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday. What jumped out to you from that testimony? I wanted to get your thoughts on that.

SK: Everything jumped out, including the Attorney General. It was an absolute embarrassment to our country that the highest ranking law enforcement officer in our country acted like a child.

That is exactly what the Attorney General was doing. She was acting like a child and she was clearly exhibiting pro-political leanings toward the current administration with absolutely no respect for the rule of law or her job, which is to remain neutral, and not favor either political party in any investigation or potential investigation.

And frankly, it was sad to me as a member of one of the branches of government to see a person like our own U.S. attorney general acting in that manner. It was sad and it was an embarrassment.

JW: Can justice be achieved with Pam Bondi as the attorney general? Is there a path towards that?

SK: No, I'm convinced that based upon the performance that she put on the other day, I don't believe that there's any way that justice can be accomplished. When we talk about an organization that is now a political arm of the executive branch, I don't see there's any possibility that justice can fully be accomplished while she's in office. I think that if Congress frankly had any integrity whatsoever they would do one of two things, either begin impeachment proceedings against the attorney general, or alternatively hold her in contempt of Congress.

JW: As you pointed out, Pam Bondi, Donald Trump, they all came into office using Epstein's survivors using the threat of violence against young women to really push a lot of their more authoritarian impulses.

This is historically true, for the Republicans and for conservatives, but particularly true in this moment. Did the Epstein files and the high profile men in Trump world mentioned in the files, plus what we've seen from the attorney general, reveal those concerns about violence against young women to be a farce?

SK: I think that what it revealed is the true nature of what politicians do. What politicians do is they find key issues that can separate society or inflame fears or tension within a society in order to trump up votes. I use that analogy and word specifically in this case because that's exactly what the president did, right?

"What politicians do is they find key issues that can separate society or inflame fears or tension within a society in order to trump up votes."

It's exactly what other Congress people did, is that they utilized an inflaming type of language and situation to be able to get votes. And then once they're in office, they completely retract what they said they were going to do. We see this in all types of enforcement actions when a government wants to move toward a more authoritarian type system where they justify actions through fear.

Be afraid of the illegals. Be afraid of the immigrants. Be afraid of the pedophiles that are in society. We are here to protect you, so you need more police and more military and more authoritarian governments to protect you from all of these bad people, when in reality that's not what they want. What they want is control.

That's how they get it is through fear. And I think that the way to combat that is really through truth and not being afraid, but instead standing up to power and questioning them and making them be held accountable in the public eye. And thankfully in a democratic society, we can vote people out of office if they fail to be held up to the standards that we expect of them.

JW: Do you think the American public is waking up to that reality? Because I see people in the streets, particularly in Minneapolis, but in LA throughout the country, really standing up against authoritarian power. And we also see people calling out what's been now dubbed the Epstein class. These group of people — powerful people — who abuse women, but also, and children, and more broadly abuse our society. Do you think there's been a wake up in our culture?

SK: I do think that certain people are now coming around to realize that these are not all just conspiracy theories, that there is a lot of truth behind what people have been saying for years about the elite billionaire class and their ploy to control society and the way that they think about the ordinary citizens in the world throughout the world, including the United States. But I also think that there is a certain group of society that looked at, for example, the testimony of Pam Bondi and cheered her on and said, "Wow, she did awesome, she did a great job." And there are still people that look at what Trump is doing and defend his every action and defend everything he's saying. So it won't be until we get to those people that things will really change, right? You need to be able to get on a level where you are communicating with people you disagree with, but you're discussing facts, not just bullet points, and not just points that are given to them by talking heads on television. You have to have a conversation with people you disagree with in a way that it can be fruitful to both sides to understand where they're coming from and understand why they think the way they do. 

And only then I think, will there be true change. Because otherwise you're going to continue to have a society that is fractured along a very definitive line. There used to be gray, there used to be a middle, and now there is just team A and team B, and that's the problem.

JW: A lot of people have called this a coverup, down from the federal government all the way to the local level. Do you see it as a coverup?

SK: 100 percent. From the beginning of this case, the government, both from a state and federal level, have been trying to bury this, cover it up, and avoid any full exposure of the extent of the operation that was involved here, and they're doing it for many obvious reasons because of all the both political, wealthy, and powerful individuals who were involved with Epstein and knew what was going on with these young women.

"It is a billionaire crowd trying to protect their own."

So as a result, you've got institutions that are controlled by wealthy, powerful politicians and individuals who are trying to cover up potential crimes of other wealthy, powerful politicians and powerful people. So it is a billionaire crowd trying to protect their own.

JW: That's a really good point and a good point to end on. But just first I wanted to give you a chance if you had any final thoughts that you wanted to share.

SK: I think the most important thing that I want people to remember is that victims need to be heard and victims need to be believed. And as a society, we need to trust what victims are saying first, until evidence shows otherwise, and not immediately accuse people of lying or exaggerating because by trusting them you can at least hear them out. And at least give them the space to talk about what they're going through. And even if it doesn't prove to be true, which is frankly only about less than 5 percent of the allegations that come out, according to statistics, but even if it doesn't, they believe it. And they're saying it for a reason that they truly believe. Whether they have some kind of issue going on in their life or not, it doesn't matter. Whether they remember an exact date, it doesn't matter.

They are going through something emotionally, so we should listen to what they have to say and allow them the space to say it without any judgment or accusation and then get them the help they need.

JW: Thank you, Spencer. That was a really important conversation and I really appreciate you taking the time to share both your point of view and then also the points of view from your clients who deserve to be heard.

SK: Thank you.

JW: Thank you for joining me on The Intercept Briefing.

SK: Thank you so much for having me today.

JW: That does it for this episode. 

This episode was produced by Laura Flynn. Sumi Aggarwal is our executive producer. Ben Muessig is our editor-in-chief. Maia Hibbett is our Managing Editor. Chelsey B. Coombs is our social and video producer. Desiree Adib is our booking producer. Fei Liu is our product and design manager. Will Stanton mixed our show. Legal review by David Bralow.

Slip Stream provided our theme music.

This show and our reporting at The Intercept doesn't exist without you. Your donation, no matter the amount, makes a real difference. Keep our investigations free and fearless at theintercept.com/join. 

And if you haven't already, please subscribe to The Intercept Briefing wherever you listen to podcasts. Do leave us a rating or a review, it helps other listeners to find us.

If you want to send us a message, email us at podcasts@theintercept.com.

Until next time, I'm Jessica Washington.

The post Attorney for Epstein Survivors Warns That Justice Is Impossible With Bondi as AG  appeared first on The Intercept.

Fanboys think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread. Devs aren't nearly as won over

Opinion I'm willing to be impressed by AI products, but Anthropic's AI‑built C compiler leaves me a bit cold. It's little more than a clever demo. It is not the moment when software engineering as we know it flips over and dies. Not even close.…

There's a new AAA John Wick game coming with Keanu Reaves portraying the main character both in voice and likeness, Lionsgate and Saber Interactive announced. Currently untitled, it's in development for PS5, Xbox Series X and S, and PC, and will be a single-player third-person experience designed for "mature" audiences. So far, there's no release date. 

"The new single-player third-person action game will combine John Wick's unparalleled, adrenaline-fueled 'gun-fu' fighting style with Saber's proven reputation for creating thrilling gaming experiences that leave players craving more," the companies said in an announcement post. They added that franchise director Chad Stahelski and star Keanu Reeves are both involved in the game's production, with Reeves reprising his character's look, voice and more. 

The story is original and "addresses a significant time in John Wick's life," according to the game's director Jesus Iglesias. It will include both familiar film characters and new ones created for the game. As for gameplay, it will offer "a hard-hitting gun-fu combat system, jaw-dropping camerawork, intense driving experiences, cinematic storytelling, and a bold range of atmospherically immersive environments," the team said.

Saber Interactive is the developer behind Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 and is also developing the upcoming titles Jurassic Park: Survival and John Carpenter's Toxic Commando. It will be the first John Wick game since John Wick Hex, which came out in 2019 but was recently delisted. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/theres-a-new-john-wick-game-on-the-way-103900064.html?src=rss

The right accessories can make your iPhone feel more capable and more personal. Whether you want to protect your phone, improve your photos or stay powered during a long day out, there are plenty of accessories that can make a real difference. MagSafe gear has opened the door for new chargers, stands and mounts, while portable batteries and compact lenses can upgrade your everyday routine.

We tested a range of products to find the best iPhone accessories that offer practical benefits for both new and older models.

Best iPhone accessories

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/computing/accessories/best-iphone-accessories-140022449.html?src=rss

Marvel Tōkon: Fighting Souls was first announced last year as a tag fighting game feature superheroes including Captain America, Ms Marvel and Spider-Man, with a launch sometime in 2026. We expected more details to be revealed at Sony's State of Play yesterday and indeed they were. The game will arrive August 6 on PS5 and PC and include the Unbreakable X-Men's Storm, Magik, Wolverine, and Danger. 

The trailer teases each character's fighting style, with Magik and Wolverine using a more in-your-face melee fighting style. Storm and Danger, meanwhile, offer more diverse attack abilities, with Storm manipulating wind and lightning and Magik deploying sorcery skills. We also saw a team-based finisher attack with all four characters joining forces to unleash a flurry of attacks. The trailer also revealed that Marvel Tōkon: Fighting Souls will offer an Episode Mode with a "new form of storytelling adapted for a modern video game format" that marries Manga with American comics. 

MARVEL Tōkon: Fighting Souls launches on August 6, 2026 for PS5 and PC. Pre-orders open February 19, 2026 at the PlayStation Store and PC storefronts. It will be sold in three versions: the $60 Standard Edition, $85 Digital Deluxe Edition (includes the full game, all pre-order incentives, a Year 1 Characters and Stage Pass) and Howard the Duck and Cosmo. Finally, the $100 Ultimate Edition includes all the preceding, plus costumes for Storm, Captain America, Doctor Doom, Iron Man, and Spider-Man, along with an Animated Chromatic color unlock for all 20 launch characters. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/marvel-tokon-fighting-souls-lands-on-ps5-and-pc-august-6-with-x-men-in-tow-095235773.html?src=rss

Death Stranding 2: On the Beach will be available on PC starting on March 19, Kojima Productions has announced at State of Play. The studio worked with Dutch video game developer Nixxes Software, which Sony acquired in 2021 to help bring PlayStation games to PCs. The sequel to the first Death Stranding is set in Australia almost a year after the events of the original game. It still features a post-apocalyptic world inhabited by strange creatures, and you'll still control Sam Porter Bridges to connect survivors in the continent to the chiral network communications system.

Kojima Production says the PC version of the game will come with a bunch of improvements, will work with NVIDIA, AMD and Intel Upscaler and FrameGen, and will have uncapped framerates. It will support 4K gaming and will come with support for ultrawide monitors with 21:9 aspect ratio, as well as for super ultrawidescreen monitors with 32:9 aspect ratio for PC. When it comes to audio, the PC version of the game supports 3D audio via Dolby Access and DTS Sound Unbound, as well as Windows Sonic for headphones. You can play using a mouse and a keyboard if you wish, but you can also play with a DualSense controller.

You'll be able to pre-purchase Death Stranding 2: On the Beach starting today for $70 on Steam or Epic Games and receive extra in-game items. The Digital Deluxe edition, which comes with more in-game extras, will set you back $10 more.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/pc/death-stranding-2-for-pc-arrives-on-march-19-095157946.html?src=rss

Scottish rival Skyrora already eyeing the assets, including Highland spaceport

Skyrora is eyeing the wreckage of fellow British rocketeer Orbex following the latter's announcement that it will appoint administrators.…

At Sony's State of Play yesterday, developer Nomada Studio revealed a DLC prequel to its gorgeous and award-winning puzzle platformer Neva. Entitled simply Neva: Prologue, it tells the story of how Alba and her wolf companion Neva met, while introducing new gameplay mechanics, locales and challenges. 

"In Neva: Prologue, players follow Alba as she chases a trail of white butterflies deep into the corrupted swamps, only to discover a frightened wolf cub, lost and alone," Nomada writes. "To survive, Alba must earn the cub's trust and guide them both through the blighted wetlands and the dark forces that stalk them."

The developer adds that Neva: Prologue is designed to be experienced after completing the main game. It adds three new locations, "each featuring unique gameplay mechanics, alongside new enemies and intense boss encounters." Completionists will also get five hidden challenge flowers. 

In her review of the original game, Engadget's Jessica Conditt found Neva "faultless" thanks to the exquisite swordplay and intuitive platforming action, along with the "stunning" world composed of "lush forests, sun-drenched valleys, soaring mountains and twisting cave systems." Neva: Prologue will released as a standalone DLC on February 19. 

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/a-neva-prequel-is-arriving-next-week-081239628.html?src=rss

Air fryers have gone from novelty appliances to everyday kitchen staples surprisingly fast. They're quick to heat up, easy to use and well suited to everything from frozen snacks to roasted vegetables and simple desserts. For many people, they've replaced the oven for smaller meals, cutting down on cook time without adding extra cleanup.

The category has also expanded well beyond basic basket-style models. Some air fryers are designed for small kitchens or single servings, while others offer larger capacities and preset cooking modes for roasting, reheating or dehydrating. After testing a wide range of machines, the Instant Vortex Plus continues to stand out for its reliable performance, straightforward controls and consistently good results.

Below, we've gathered the best air fryers you can buy right now across different sizes and price points. Whether you're replacing an older unit or trying one for the first time, these picks focus on appliances that are easy to live with and deliver crisp food without the need for deep frying.

Best air fryers for 2026

What does an air fryer do?

Let's clear one thing up first: it's not frying. Not really. Air fryers are more like smaller convection bake ovens, ones that are often pod-shaped. Most work by combining a heating element and fan, which means the hot air can usually better crisp the outside of food than other methods. They often reach higher top temperatures than toaster ovens - which is part of the appeal.

For most recipes, a thin layer of oil (usually sprayed) helps to replicate that fried look and feel better. However, it will rarely taste precisely like the deep-fried or pan frying version when it comes out of the air fryer basket. Don't let that put you off, though, because the air fryer, in its many forms, combines some of the best parts of other cooking processes and brings them together into an energy-efficient way of air fryer cooking dinner. Or breakfast. Or lunch.

Buying guide for air fryers Convection ovens

You can separate most of these machines into two types of air fryers, and each has different pros and cons. Convection ovens are usually ovens with air fryer functions and features. They might have higher temperature settings to ensure that food crisps and cooks more like actually fried food. Most convection ovens are larger than dedicated air fryers, defeating some of the purpose of those looking to shrink cooking appliance surface area. Still, they are often more versatile with multiple cooking functions, and most have finer controls for temperatures, timings and even fan speed.

You may never need a built-in oven if you have a decent convection oven. They often have the volume to handle roasts, entire chickens or tray bakes, and simply cook more, capacity-wise, making them more versatile than the pod-shaped competition.

The flip side of that is that you'll need counter space in the kitchen to house them. It also means you can use traditional oven accessories, like baking trays or cake tins, that you might already own.

Pod-shaped air fryers

Pod-shaped air fryers are what you imagine when you think "air fryer." They look like a cool, space-age kitchen gadget, bigger than a kettle but smaller than a toaster oven. Many use a drawer to hold ingredients while cooking, usually a mesh sheet or a more solid, non-stick tray with holes to allow the hot air to circulate. With a few exceptions, most require you to open the drawer while things cook and flip or shake half-cooked items to ensure the even distribution of heat and airflow to everything.

That's one of a few caveats. This type of air fryer typically doesn't have a window to see how things are cooking (with only a few exceptions), so you'll need to closely scrutinize things as they cook, opening the device to check progress. Basket-style air fryers also generally use less energy - there's less space to heat - and many have parts that can be put directly into a dishwasher.

Some of the larger pod-shaped air fryers offer two separate compartments, which is especially useful for anyone planning to cook an entire meal with the appliance. You could cook a couple of tasty chicken wings or tenders while simultaneously rustling up enough frozen fries or veggies for everyone. Naturally, those options take up more space, and they're usually heavy enough to stop you from storing them in cupboards or shelves elsewhere.

As mentioned earlier, you might have to buy extra things to make these pod fryers work the way you want them to. Some of the bigger manufacturers, like Philips and Ninja, offer convenient additions, but you'll have to pay for them.

Air fryer pros and cons

Beyond the strengths and weaknesses of individual models, air fryers are pretty easy to use from the outset. Most models come with a convenient cooking time booklet covering most of the major foods you'll be air frying, so even beginners can master these machines.

One of the early selling points is the ability to cook fries, wings, frozen foods and other delights with less fat than other methods like deep frying, which gets foods the crispiest. As air fryers work by circulating heated air, the trays and cooking plates have holes that can also let oil and fat drain out of meats, meaning less fat and crisper food when you finally plate things up. For most cooking situations, you will likely need to lightly spray food with vegetable oil. If you don't, there's the chance that things will burn or char. The oil will keep things moist on the surface, and we advise refreshing things with a dash of oil spray when you turn items during cooking.

Most air fryers are easy to clean - especially in comparison to a shallow or deep fryer. We'll get into cleaning guidance a little later.

With a smaller space to heat, air fryers are generally more energy-efficient for cooking food than larger appliances like ovens. And if you don't have an oven, air fryers are much more affordable - especially the pod options.

There are, however, some drawbacks. While air fryers are easy enough to use, they take time to master. You will adjust cooking times for even the simplest types of food - like chicken nuggets, frozen French fries or brussels sprouts. If you're the kind of person that loves to find inspiration from the internet, in our experience, you can pretty much throw their timings out of the window. There are a lot of air fryer options, and factors like how fast they heat and how well distributed that heat is can - and will - affect cooking.

There's also a space limitation to air fryers. This is not a TARDIS - there's simply less space than most traditional ovens and many deep fat fryers. If you have a bigger family, you'll probably want to go for a large capacity air fryer - possibly one that has multiple cooking areas. You also might want to consider a different kitchen appliance, like a multicooker, sous vide or slow cooker to meet your specific cooking needs.

You may also struggle to cook many items through as the heat settings will cook the surface of dishes long before it's cooked right through. If you're planning to cook a whole chicken or a roast, please get a meat thermometer!

Best air fryer accessories

Beyond official accessories from the manufacturer, try to pick up silicone-tipped tools. Tongs are ideal, as is a silicon spatula to gently loosen food that might get stuck on the sides of the air fryer. These silicone mats will also help stop things from sticking to the wire racks on some air fryers. They have holes to ensure the heated air is still able to circulate around the food.

Silicone trivets are also useful for resting any cooked food on while you sort out the rest of the meal. And if you find yourself needing oil spray, but don't feel like repeatedly buying tiny bottles, you can decant your favorite vegetable oil into a permanent mister like this.

How to clean an air fryer

We're keeping clean up simple here. Yes, you could use power cleaners from the grocery store, they could damage the surface of your air fryer. Likewise, metal scourers or brushes could strip away the non-stick coating. Remember to unplug the device and let it cool completely.

Remove the trays, baskets and everything else from inside. If the manufacturer says the parts are dishwasher safe - and you have a dishwasher - the job is pretty much done.

Otherwise, hand wash each part in a mixture of warm water, with a splash of Dawn or another strong dish soap. Use a soft-bristled brush to pull away any crumbs, greasy deposits or bits of food stuck to any surfaces. Remember to rinse everything. Otherwise, your next batch of wings could have a mild Dawn aftertaste. Trust us.

Take a microfiber cloth and tackle the outer parts and handles that might also get a little messy after repeated uses. This is especially useful for oven-style air fryers - use the cloth to wipe down the inner sides.

If Dawn isn't shifting oily stains, try mixing a small amount of baking soda with enough water to make a paste, and apply that so that it doesn't seep into any electrical parts or the heating element. Leave it to work for a few seconds before using a damp cloth to pull any greasy spots away. Rinse out the cloth and wipe everything down again, and you should be ready for the next time you need to air fry.

How to find air fryer recipes

Beyond fries, nuggets and - a revelation - frozen gyoza, there are a few ways to find recipes for air-fried foods. First, we found that the air fryer instruction manuals often have cooking guides and recipe suggestions for you to test out in your new kitchen gadget. The good thing with these is that they were made for your air fryer model, meaning success should be all but guaranteed. They are often a little unimaginative, however.

Many of the top recipe sites and portals have no shortage of air fryer recipes, and there's no harm in googling your favorite cuisine and adding the words "air fryer" on the end of the search string. We've picked up some reliable options from Delish, which also has a handy air fryer time converter for changing oven and traditional fryer recipes. BBC Good Food is also worth browsing for some simple ideas, as is NYT Cooking, with the ability to directly search for air fryer suggestions. Aside from that, you can also grab plenty of cookbooks from your local bookshop with lots of recipes that you can use in your favorite air fryer.

And if you have a killer recipe or unique use for your air fryer, let us know in the comments. What's the air fryer equivalent of the Instant Pot cheesecake? We're ready to try it.

How we test air fryers

We put each air fryer we test through its paces by cooking a variety of foods in it including raw proteins like fish and chicken, raw vegetables like potatoes and cauliflower and frozen snacks like mozzarella sticks. We attempt to use each cooking method that the machine has pre-programmed, and when possible, follow a couple of recipes in any provided recipe booklets that come with the air fryer. We also clean the cooking basket and all other removable components as many times as possible, and will put those components into a dishwasher if they claim to be dishwasher-safe. We also make note of how loud the machine is when using different cooking settings and how warm the surrounding area becomes.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/home/kitchen-tech/best-air-fryers-133047180.html?src=rss

Years later, he read about his antagonist doing time for murder

On Call Welcome to another installment of On Call, The Register's weekly reader-contributed column that tells your tech support tales.…

At some point, we, as a society, are going to realize that farming copyright enforcement out to bots and AI-driven robocops is not the way to go, but today is not that day. Long before AI became the buzzword it is today, large companies have employed their own copyright crawler bots, or employed those of a third party, to police their copyrights on these here internets. And for just as long, those bots have absolutely sucked out loud at their jobs. We have seen example after example after example of those bots making mistakes, resulting in takedowns or threats of takedowns of all kinds of perfectly legit content. Upon discovery, the content is usually reinstated while those employing the copyright decepticons shrug their shoulders and say "Thems the breaks." And then it happens again.

It has to change, but isn't. We have yet another recent example of this in action, with Microsoft's copyright enforcement partner using an AI-driven enforcement bot to get a video game delisted from Steam over a single screenshot on the game's page that looks like, but isn't, from Minecraft. The game in question, Allumeria, clearly is partially inspired by Minecraft, but doesn't use any of its assets and is in fact its own full-fledged creative work.

On Tuesday, the developer behind the Minecraft-looking, dungeon-raiding sandbox announced that their game had been taken down from Valve's storefront due to a DMCA copyright notice issued by Microsoft. The notice, shared by developer Unomelon in the game's Discord server, accused Allumeria of using "Minecraft content, including but not limited to gameplay and assets."

The takedown was apparently issued over one specific screenshot from the game's Steam page. It shows a vaguely Minecraft-esque world with birch trees, tall grass, a blue sky, and pumpkins: all things that are in Minecraft but also in real life and lots of other games. The game does look pretty similar to Minecraft, but it doesn't appear to be reusing any of its actual assets or crossing some arbitrary line between homage and copycat that dozens of other Minecraft-inspired games haven't crossed before. 

It turns out the takedown request didn't come from Microsoft directly, but via Tracer.AI. Tracer.AI claims to have a bot driven by artificial intelligence for automatic flagging and removal of copyright infringing content.

It seems the system failed to understand in this case that the image in question, while being similar to those including Minecraft assets, didn't actually infringe upon anything. Folks at Mojang caught wind of this on BlueSky and had to take action.

While it's unclear if the claim was issued automatically or intentionally, Mojang Chief Creative Officer Jens Bergensten (known to most Minecraft players as Jeb) responded to a comment about the takedown on Bluesky, stating that he was not aware and is now "investigating." Roughly 12 hours later, Allumeria's Steam page has been reinstated.

"Microsoft has withdrawn their DMCA claim!" Unomelon posted earlier today. "The game is back up on Steam! Allumeria is back! Thank you EVERYONE for your support. It's hard to comprehend that a single post in my discord would lead to so many people expressing support."

And this is the point in the story where we all go back to our lives and pretend like none of this ever happened. But that sucks. For starters, there is no reason we should accept that this kind of collateral damage, temporary or not. Add to that there are surely stories out there in which a similar resolution was not reached. How many games, how much other non-infringing content out there, were taken down for longer from an erroneous claim like this? How many never came back?

And at the base level, the fact is that if companies are going to claim that copyright is of paramount importance to their business, that can't be farmed out to automated systems that aren't good at their job.

Regional internet registry that serves half of humanity wants more perspectives in more languages

APRICOT 2026 When members of the Asia Pacific Network Information Centre got their chance to grill its leaders at yesterday's annual general meeting, they didn't hold back.…

This bodes well for Nvidia getting Vera Rubin out the door next quarter as planned

Samsung and Micron say they've started shipping HBM4 memory, the faster and denser RAM needed to power the next generation of AI acceleration hardware.…

Ring has canceled its partnership with Flock Safety, after receiving backlash for running a Super Bowl ad touting its Search Party feature. If you'll recall, Ring revealed back in October 2025 that it was entering a partnership with the surveillance company, which would make it possible for law enforcement to ask smart doorbell owners for videos captured by their devices. In its announcement, the company said that the "planned Flock Safety integration would require significantly more time and resources than anticipated." The decision to call off the partnership was mutual, Ring added, and Flock Safety's integration was never launched. Apparently, no Ring customer footage was ever sent to Flock.

Under the partnership, law enforcement agencies using Flock's Nova platform or FlockOS would have been able to use Ring's Community Requests to ask for doorbell videos from users. They would have been asked to specify the location and timeframe of the incident, as well as provide a unique investigation code and the details about what is being investigated. Their requests would then be forwarded to relevant users, who could choose to share footage from their doorbell. Ring said the whole process would have been anonymous and optional.

Ring was known to have shared security cam videos to law enforcement without a court order or the device owner's consent at least 11 times in the past. In 2024, however, it seemed to have walked back its police-friendly stance and said that it would stop sharing videos with the police without a warrant. This alliance with Flock would have marked a return to police collaboration after the company distanced itself from law enforcement.

While Ring's official reason was that the Flock partnership would need more resources than expected, it's worth noting that the company recently got flak for its Super Bowl Search Party ad. Ring touted it as a way to find lost dogs by using its cameras' AI to identify pets running across their field of vision and then pooling feeds together to identify missing pets. While Search Party isn't new and was announced last year, the ad sparked concerns about surveillance and how the tech could be misused, leading users to disable the feature for their cameras altogether.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/home/ring-calls-off-partnership-with-police-surveillance-provider-flock-safety-031717605.html?src=rss

Ctrl-Alt-Speech is a weekly podcast about the latest news in online speech, from Mike Masnick and Everything in Moderation's Ben Whitelaw.

Subscribe now on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, Pocket Casts, YouTube, or your podcast app of choice — or go straight to the RSS feed.

In this week's roundup of the latest news in online speech, content moderation and internet regulation, Ben is joined by Dr. Blake Hallinan, Professor of Platform Studies in the Department of Media & Journalism Studies at Aarhus University. Together, they discuss:

• On Section 230's 30th Birthday, A Look Back At Why It's Such A Good Law And Why Messing With It Would Be Bad (Techdirt)
• An 18-Million-Subscriber YouTuber Just Explained Section 230 Better Than Every Politician In Washington (Techdirt)
• Discord Launches Teen-by-Default Settings Globally (Discord)
• Media Literacy Parent's study (GOV.UK)
• EU says TikTok must disable 'addictive' features like infinite scroll, fix its recommendation engine (Techcrunch)
• We Didn't Ask for This Internet with Tim Wu and Cory Doctorow (The New York Times)
• Despite Meta's ban, Fidesz candidates successfully posted 162 political ads on Facebook in January 9 (Lakmusz.hu)
• Claude's Constitution Needs a Bill of Rights and Oversight (Oversight Board)
• Account Closed Without Notice: Debanking Adult Industry Workers in Canada (ResearchGate)

Play along with Ctrl-Alt-Speech's 2026 Bingo Card and get in touch if you win!

A large gang of extremist Israeli colonisers has illegally crossed the 'blue line' dividing southern Lebanon and Israel to try to stake a claim to land that is not theirs. The far-right 'Awaken the North' group planted trees somewhere on the Lebanese side of the border and demanded the restart of Israeli settlement in Lebanon.

The group was then whisked back into Israel by the occupation military. Israeli authorities went through the motions of condemning the excursion, but no action against the racist group is likely.

In a deranged statement, one of the group's leaders claimed its action was "moral" and "necessary" and that it was reclaiming "our land:"

This is right for security and it is a necessary step from a moral and historical point of view.

One of the group's leaders said that the Israeli colonisers were "putting down roots" in "our country", regurgitating Israeli 'inheritance' propaganda:

We came here today, to plant trees and put down roots in the soil of our country, regardless of the fences. The State of Israel must renew the settlement in Lebanon, this is historically correct, it is right from a security point of view, and it is right from a moral point of view. South Lebanon is a piece of the inheritance of our forefathers, where Jewish settlement existed for thousands of years. In order to ensure the security of the residents of the north, the construction of civilian settlements in southern Lebanon, near IDF posts, must be promoted.

If you look closely at the featured image, you'll find the group has the Lebanese cedar in the centre of a Star of David as their logo. In the words of brother Omar from Four Lions: "I think you're confused bro."

Israel has bombed southern Lebanon daily, despite the supposed 'ceasefire' in place since the occupation's 2024 terrorist attack using exploding pagers. These attacks have murdered dozens of civilians.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Labour MPs have complained to their boss Keir Starmer that the party and its activists are now dismissed by the public as "paedo lovers". The complaint came during Starmer's emergency meeting with women from the parliamentary party yesterday, 11 February 2026.

The meeting followed a further 'Labour nonceberg' scandal over Starmer's peerage for former adviser Matthew Doyle despite knowing Doyle had campaigned for the election of a Scottish Labour paedophile. This in turn followed the scandal of the various appointments given to the disgraced Peter Mandelson despite his ardent fandom toward serial child-rapist Jeffrey Epstein — to whom he also leaked confidential state and financial information.

There is no mention in reporting that women MPs raised the issue of the victims of Epstein or Doyle's close friend Sean Morton. Starmer has also refused to say that disgraced former royal Andrew should apologise to his victims.

To the informed, none of this is surprising, either from Starmer or from the women MPs. Labour's 'white feminists' have routinely ignored the plight of victims who are not 'people like us'. Starmer's record as Labour leader is an appalling continuation of the impunity of celebrity paedophiles when he ran the CPS.

Nonceberg

As well as the cases of Mandelson, Doyle/Morton and Andrew, Starmer:

• Welcomed the London MP Neil Coyle back under the Labour whip despite Coyle being found by Parliament to have sexually harassed a staffer, as well as racially abusing a Chinese-British man.
• Turned a blind eye to then-Chester MP Chris Matheson's sexual harassment: neither Starmer nor the party machine suspended him pending the outcome of the investigation, as would be usual practice to protect the women around him.
• Protected at least two further alleged sex pests on his front bench.

The public are right

The angry public on the doorstep is not wrong: Starmer's right-wing, pro-Israel faction is rife with paedophiles:

• 'Friend of Israel' Liron Velleman has just been convicted of repeated sex crimes against a 13-year-old girl.
• In January 2025, former Blair minister Ivor Caplin was arrested in a sting operation as he allegedly attempted to meet a 15-year-old boy for sex. Local police went after local left-winger Greg Hadfield for exposing the explicit content Caplin posted on his X feed — Hadfield defeated the 'vexatious' charge in November 2025. However, no charges have yet been brought against Caplin and a court did not impose bail conditions after his initial bail expired.
• Hackney councillor Tom Dewey, an organiser in pro-Israel group 'Labour First', admitted possession of the most serious category of child rape images in 2023. The party knew of his arrest when it allowed him to stand for election. After his conviction, it blocked local women members from its systems to prevent them discussing the case.
• In March 2025 Sam Gould, another JLM activist who worked for Starmer's health secretary Wes Streeting, quit as a Redbridge councillor after being convicted on two separate counts of indecent exposure to a 13-year-old girl.
•  The following month Dan Norris MP, an ally of Keir Starmer, was arrested over allegations of rape, child sex offences and child abduction.  Avon and Somerset Police says its investigation is still ongoing.
•  The same Dan Norris was arrested again for allegations of rape and sexual assault.

And in August 2025, the US allowed Israeli cyberwar official Tom Alexandrovich to fly back to Israel after he was caught in a police paedophile sting. Starmer is fond of both countries.

Starmer's war on Labour-left — in retrospect

And while Starmer's senior cronies were deselecting or blocking potential left-wing parliamentary candidates on any pretext they could find, they were ignoring legal advice to let their mates stand.

Labour's national executive ignored the advice of its barrister that it needed to thoroughly investigate allegations of 'serious' sexual assault against slum landlord Jas Athwal. Then-Redbridge council leader Athwal is now a right-wing Labour MP close to health secretary Wes Streeting. Instead of investigating, the NEC dropped the case and reinstated Athwal to allow his rigged selection as the party's parliamentary candidate in Ilford South.

Starmer ignored whistleblower

Perhaps most seriously, Starmer and his then-sidekick David Evans covered up Jewish whistleblower Elaina Cohen's allegations of serial abuse of women by a party staffer.

Cohen repeatedly warned Starmer and Evans that a staffer working for then-Perry Barr MP Khalid Mahmood — and allegedly Mahmood's lover — was engaged in 'sadistic' and 'criminal' abuse of vulnerable Muslim women. The victims were fleeing domestic violence, through the now-defunct domestic violence 'charity' that she ran.

Warned time and again, Starmer and Evans did nothing. Mahmood remained on Starmer's front bench as long as he chose to be there. Cohen was sacked from her role as a parliamentary aide.

One of the victims gave evidence, at Cohen's successful wrongful dismissal tribunal, of the horrific abuse she and others had suffered. This included blackmail and sexual exploitation. Her evidence was not challenged by Mahmood or his lawyers. Mahmood admitted under oath to the tribunal that he had also personally made sure that Starmer was fully aware of Cohen's allegations.

Starmer's protection of child sex offenders is a mountain. His contempt for their victims is another. Both have been almost entirely ignored by 'mainstream' media.

For more on the Epstein Files, please read the Canary's article on how the media circus around Epstein is erasing the experiences of victims and survivors.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Three months after it began, the story of President Donald Trump's siege of Minnesota has been one told with violent imagery. Masked men smashing windows and dragging women from their cars. A smiling mother behind the wheel of her SUV, a rattling of gunshots, a dashboard sprayed with blood. Outraged Americans shouting at government agents amid clouds of choking gas. An ICU nurse prone on the pavement.

The images told the story of the streets, but even as the administration moves to wind down its historic immigration crackdown in the Twin Cities, announcing a drawdown of operations this week, another story unfolds behind locked doors and drawn curtains. It is the story of tens of thousands of families living in terror, too afraid to venture into their communities for life's most basic necessity: food.

In response to unprecedented conditions, an underground army coalesced to bring sustenance to families in hiding.

On the ground in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and communities across the state, this is the reality that has kept people up at night.

In response to unprecedented conditions, an underground army coalesced to bring sustenance to families in hiding. The Intercept was recently invited inside a nondescript Minneapolis warehouse to observe their operations in action.

It was delivery day, which meant volunteers stuffing boxes with oatmeal and spaghetti, flour and chicken, rice, tomato sauce, vegetable oil, and more. Six hundred boxes were prepared the day before. Hundreds more would be added by day's end. Inside, volunteers left notes telling recipients they were missed, and that they hoped to see them again soon.

The packages were loaded into a fleet of station wagons and SUVs. Alongside the food was baby formula, medication, and other essentials. Many of the vehicles were driven by teachers taking supplies to the families of students who haven't been to class for weeks. They would proceed carefully on their mission, one eye on the rear-view mirror as they ferried their precious cargo.

As the latest in a series of dragnets targeting Democratic-led cities and states, Minnesota's "Operation Metro Surge" saw 3,000 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol personnel deployed in early December. Across the state, immigrant families went into hiding.

Joe Walker, director of nutritional services at the Sanneh Foundation, a local charity that operates a mobile food shelf in the Twin Cities, saw the impact immediately.

Related "Uptick in Abductions": ICE Ramps Up Targeting of Minneapolis Legal Observers

Not only were families no longer appearing to receive food, Walker told The Intercept, delivery vehicles were being followed, and distribution sites were being staked out by suspected federal agents. To volunteers on the ground, it felt as though the government was weaponizing hunger to root out a foreign enemy.

"We have to play by all the rules," Walker said. "They don't."

Building an Aid Operation

Guiding operations at the warehouse visited by The Intercept was a 24-year-old soccer coach named Mu Thoo. Thoo spent his first eight years in Thailand and the rest of his life in the Twin Cities. He went to work for Walker's mobile food shelf in 2022. 

As part of the immigrant community, Thoo acknowledged that Metro Surge upended life for countless families.

"It's scary," Thoo told The Intercept, but, he added, "I don't believe in living in fear. People are going to need food, and that's something every human should have a right to. And we're gonna come out and give food to people."

"People are going to need food, and that's something every human should have a right to."

A veteran of the battle against hunger in Minnesota, Walker helped craft the state's regulations surrounding food shelves and served on the governor's hunger task force, counseling emergency management teams during the pandemic and the uprising that followed the murder of Minneapolis resident George Floyd.

The 46-year-old was immensely proud of the system his team had built. At its core were weekly, in-person distribution events in parks across the city. Held year-round, they were designed to provide a farmer's market-style experience, where families could pick and choose from the food on offer. Naturalists came to put on demonstrations for the kids. Families from South America would visit with volunteers. Bonds of community were forged between residents who otherwise may never have met.

Watching the Trump administration's immigration blitzes in Chicago and Los Angeles, Walker braced for a similar assault in Minnesota. His team began noticing a steady drop off in people of color showing up to receive food in late summer and early fall. After Metro Surge was announced, participation plummeted, from a high of nearly 700 people receiving food during a busy week last year to just over 60 once the operation began.

Read our complete coverage

Chilling Dissent

It was clear a major strategy shift was in order. At first, Walker experimented with using delivering trucks to provision clients no longer showing up in person. Soon, however, it became evident the risks were too high. In January, a food shelf delivery volunteer was taken by federal agents in the parking lot of a community center. A coalition of roughly 100 hunger relief organizations signed a letter describing the apprehension as part of a broader patter of federal agents exploiting food delivery to jack up arrests.

With one of his own drivers followed by a suspected ICE vehicle, Walker recognized that such surveillance could tip off federal agents to dozens of families in a single day. To safely get food to people would require a low profile, under-the-radar approach. To get there, Walker and his team embraced a decentralized, word-of-mouth method of operations, working with community members who were already known and trusted by their neighbors in hiding.

The pivot took off. In December, the mobile food shelf made deliveries to 735 families. In January, they delivered 1,640, an increase of 123 percent.

Food aid makes its way to immigrants in hiding on Feb. 6, 2026, in Minneapolis. Photo: Ryan Devereaux Lasting Damage

On Thursday, Trump's border czar and former ICE Acting Director Tom Homan announced a drawdown of Operation Metro Surge, effective immediately. It will likely take years to unpack the full cost of the campaign. Already, the early indicators are staggering.

While the true number of households that have received aid is impossible to know, estimates in mid-January from just one network of schools and churches hovered around 30,000 — likely a considerable undercount considering the vast number of smaller scale operations and neighbor-to-neighbor relationships facilitating care.

The mass fear engendered by the government has cost the local economy upwards of $20 million a week. Immigrant businesses have suffered tremendously, with revenue losses as high as 100 percent. Local healthcare providers estimate a 25 percent drop in emergency room and clinic visits. Isolated from their classmates and friends, immigrant kids have reverted to Covid-style online learning, as parent pick-up and drop-off sites having become hunting grounds for federal agents. 

In his address this week, Homan stressed that "mass deportations" remain the administration's chief immigration objective in Minnesota and around the country, suggesting the fear that has kept people inside these past several months is unlikely to abate anytime soon.

Although Minnesotans in the field of hunger relief take pride in their state's progressive policies, efforts to feed people in need were already strained before Metro Surge began. Trump's signature 2025 legislation, the Big Beautiful Bill, which pumped an unprecedented $75 billion into ICE, making it the most well-funded law enforcement agency in history, also cut a record $186 billion in funding for the federal government's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, significantly heightening the risk of food insecurity for tens of millions of people nationwide.

Schools with high immigrant student populations, where high attendance rates are linked to the availability of free breakfasts and lunches, have seen more than 60 percent of their kids stop coming to class. When those students join their parents in hiding, the 10 meals they would have received each week fall to their parents to provide; parents whose ability to move in the outside world, let alone earn money, is threatened by continuing deportation operations. Those burdens are exacerbated in families with multiple children and cases where the head of the household is disappeared by the state.

It's not just undocumented families being impacted, Walker explained.

"There's a lot of Black and brown people that are just scared to be out and about," he said, regardless of their immigration status. "It's like covid hit a certain population of the Twin Cities."

"When do we call it's all clear? I have no idea."

Even as ICE prepares to draw down its presence, Walker and his team recognize that picking up the pieces after an operation that left two Americans dead and funneled thousands of residents into the deportation pipeline will take months, if not years.

"Families are being ruined financially, businesses are being ruined. It's a huge economic hit," he said. "And that is not even the hardest part. When it's all done, then there's the count of the missing. Where are they? Are they going to come home? These are our neighbors."

"There's no vaccine for this one," Walker continued. "When do we call it's all clear? I have no idea."

"The Fear Never Leaves"

Walker's team continues to provide in-person food availability at local parks. At one drop-off location, The Intercept saw a girl of perhaps 12 years of age and what looked to be her younger brother wheel a pair of empty strollers into a recreation center. The girl loaded her reusable grocery bags with oranges, chicken and milk. It was her second time visiting the site, she said.

Before leaving, the children spoke briefly with Sanneh employee Alberto Hernández.

"With a lot of the first-gen kids being born here, they do come for their parents," Hernández told The Intercept, after the children went on their way.

The 25-year-old Hernández could relate. He was a first-gen kid himself, the son of Mexican immigrants, born and raised in the Twin Cities area. He enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps after high school and joined Sanneh in September, just months before Metro Surge took off.

"I carry everything. I carry my veteran ID. I carry my passport."

Hernández is a big guy, clean cut with a friendly face. He'd served his country and was now spending his days giving back to the community that raised him. Even he was scared.

"I carry everything," he said. "I carry my veteran ID. I carry my passport."

It was Hernández who'd been followed by suspected ICE agents while making runs for the food shelf. His experience was just one of many. One of his closest friends hadn't left home since late December. Another, a legal resident, was surrounded by eight ICE agents while shopping at a Home Depot. According to Hernández, the barrel of an AR-15 was pressed to his skull and agents threw him to the ground before permitting him to go.

"The thing is," Hernández said, "the fear never leaves."

Despite being a military veteran with a white girlfriend, Hernández still felt uncomfortable going out to eat.

"We can't even sit and just chill," he said. "People need to know that. That's how it is here. Always looking over your shoulder."

At the same time, life in Minnesota wasn't all paranoia and dread. To Hernández, who lived in downtown Minneapolis and witnessed a 50,000-person march last month demanding ICE's retreat from the city, it was a moment of neighborly solidarity the likes of which he'd never seen. It was a reminder, to him, that he was not alone.

"As someone who's a child of immigrants, it's really nice," he said. "It's very, very, very beautiful to see. The people of Minneapolis, and the people of Minnesota, stand up for the community and their neighbors."

The post Trump Attacked Immigrant Food Aid in Minnesota. Locals Fought Back. appeared first on The Intercept.

The Welsh government has unanimously passed the Homelessness and Social Housing Allocation Bill into law, which experts have labelled "life-changing"

The Senedd passed the new law on February 10, 2026, and it will provide support far sooner than current legislation allows, preventing people from losing their homes and falling into homelessness.

It will also require public services to work together to prevent homelessness and to allocate social housing to those most at risk.

The bill will:

• Expand access to homelessness services and provide additional support to those who need it most.
• Widen responsibility to certain specified public authorities to identify individuals who are homeless or at risk of homelessness and respond effectively.
• Prioritise allocation of social housing to those most in need.

Homelessness — a growing crisis

From April 2024 to March 2025, 13,287 households were homeless in Wales. Local councils only secured accommodation for 25% of these.

The total number of households staying in temporary accommodation was 6,285. Of these, 2,397 (38%) were staying in unsuitable bed and breakfasts.

As it stands, local authorities can only take action 56 days before someone falls into homelessness. The new law will extend this to six months.

The bill also commits to scrapping both priority need and the intentionally homeless. However, it does not give a date for doing so.

As it stands, priority need means that certain groups, such as pregnant women, people with children, young people, care leavers, and victims of domestic abuse, are accepted as being a higher priority for homelessness assistance.

Being 'intentionally homeless' technically means that a person is homeless, or threatened with homelessness, due to something they deliberately did or failed to do. 

However, local authorities often use it as a guise for refusing help to people who have to leave unsafe situations, such as traumatised women having to leave mixed-sex accommodation, or young people feeling unsafe in adult hostels.

If a council deems someone intentionally homeless, it does not have to offer long-term housing. 

Social housing allocation

The bill has placed all registered social housing providers under a new legal obligation to assist people experiencing homelessness. It has also given ministers new powers to issue orders to these providers, requiring them to comply.

However, some organisations have criticised the bill for failing to outlaw the use of unsafe temporary accommodation.

According to the Bevan Foundation:

At present, local authorities only need to have "due regard" to the various legal standards on the suitability of accommodation when fulfilling their homelessness duties. This includes having "due regard" to whether the property is fit for human habitation and the presence of Category 1 hazards such as damp and mould, excessive cold, fire risk and structural issues like unstable staircases.

The organisation previously published a report on the dangers of unsuitable accommodation. It highlighted how temporary

accommodation causes physical harm to children, along with the fact that local authorities are not meeting or enforcing regulations.

Other amendments related to protecting victims of domestic violence and abuse had been put forward, but not included.

Matt Downie, Chief Executive at Crisis, said:

The new Homelessness and Social Housing Allocations Bill has the potential to be life-changing for the thousands of people across Wales that are facing the trauma that comes from living without a stable place to call home.

But the work does not end here. The Welsh Government and incoming Members of the Senedd after the elections in May 2026 must now invest in the proper implementation of these new laws. It is critical that services have the guidance, funding and resources to really deliver the ambition of the Bill and work towards ending homelessness.

Feature image via Centre for Homelessness Impact 

By HG

Israeli apartheid has shown itself again with absolute clarity. Israel wants a new law which would see Palestinians executed for crimes which Israelis are only jailed for. The latest death penalty bill has been heavily criticised by legal experts on that basis.

Lawyers and security experts subjected the bill to analysis. Haaretz reported on 9 February that those experts think the bill would have "grave international implications" and be unlawful.

Haaretz reported on this wild disparity:

One of the bill's clauses states that the defense minister may allow a military commander to determine that a West Bank resident who intentionally caused the death of a person under circumstances deemed to be terrorism can be punished only by death. The law states that this determination does not apply to an Israeli citizen or resident.

One rule for one group, another for the second.

Killing in the name of…

The Israeli far-right is eager to pass the law. Not that Israeli politics — or the whole ethnosupremacist project in itself — produces much of a left-wing. Of the legal experts who joined the panel to assess the bill:

The only ones who did not express opposition to the law were an Israel Prison Service official and David Bavli, an adviser to National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

Security minister Ben-Gvir yearns for Palestinians to be exterminated. He visits shackled Palestinians in jail and tells them he wants them to be executed. He does this on camera, for effect.

Tzvika Foghel, chair of the Knesset National Security Committee panel on the bill, is also a far-right figure.

Lilach Wagner, a Justice Ministry official, warned the bill did not reach Israel's constitutional standards. They claimed that even security officials within the settler state apparatus:

 took a cautious approach regarding the question of whether the bill fulfills its stated main purpose, while it is clear that the proposal has weighty international implications.

The bill's second and third readings lay ahead. And it does not include Hamas members alleged to have carried out the 7 October 2023 attack — a separate bill will cover those individuals.

Apartheid — extermination policy

Middle East Eye reported on 9 February that a 'Green Mile'-style execution building is already being built to hold and execute Palestinian prisoners:

Training and procedural preparations have also started, while a delegation from the prison service is expected to visit an East Asian country to study the legal and regulatory framework for implementing capital punishment.

The Commission of Detainees and Ex-Detainees Affairs and the Palestinian Prisoners' Club said the plans were depraved:

The occupation has not been content with killing dozens of prisoners and detainees since the war of extermination began. Today, it seeks to entrench the crime of execution by enacting a specific law for it.

They added:

This law is an addition to a repressive legislative system that, for decades, has targeted all aspects of Palestinian life. It is another step to entrench the crime and attempt to legitimise it.

A 2017 poll suggested up to 70% of Israelis support capital punishment for Palestinians convicted of terrorism. Israel still has the death penalty on its statutes. The Israeli state appears to have executed two people throughout its brief history. In June 1948, Israel shot one of their own, Meir Tobianksi, for treason. Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi, was the second.

Powerful Israeli figures now seem to want to use the prison system as a new front in its genocide against the Palestinians. Of course, in some way it always was. What lawmakers are proposing is a rapid acceleration. There is nothing anomalous about this. The truth is that settler colonial projects lead here with the sureness of gravity.

Featured image via Amnesty International

By Joe Glenton

Morgan McSweeney is gone, for now. But an MP who served on Labour's frontbench has passed me details of an unknown, unelected group that "rules with a rod of iron" and is still fighting to retain control of the Labour Party.

Morgan McSweeney: still trying to control Labour

Matthew Doyle is the first link in McSweeney's inner circle.

In December, Starmer was criticised for giving Doyle a peerage even though he had previously campaigned for Sean Morton, a Scottish Labour councillor now convicted of child sex offences. Sean Morton, councillor for Fochabers and Lhanbryde, was charged in 2016. In 2017, he stood for re-election as councillor. Doyle travelled up to Scotland, wore a t-shirt that read "Re-elect Sean Morton", and accompanied him to the election count. Then, in 2018, Morton was convicted of a string of crimes that included possession of indecent pictures of ten year-old girls.

On 10 February, and despite originally defending the decision to nominate Doyle for a peerage, saying that his links to Morton had been "thoroughly investigated" before the decision was made, Labour was forced to suspend him.

But here lies the problem: such is the grip that the McSweeney faction has held over Labour, no misdemeanour is too big to be swept under the carpet, and it is only when scandals are picked up by investigative journalists that the Starmer regime feels forced to act.

McSweeney reportedly insisted on the appointment of Epstein-informant Peter Mandelson as US ambassador. Starmer went along with it and Labour MPs fell into line. Everyone knew, they just didn't care.

McSweeney's 'tight' crew

According to the former Labour frontbencher who contacted me:

The inner circle were tight. WhatsApp tight. They talked openly of taking over the Labour Party literally. And to get rid of every existing MP eventually. Morgan seemed to run everything.

The second link in McSweeney's "inner circle" is Matthew Faulding. Faulding worked under McSweeney's close supervision as Labour's director of candidates, ensuring that only Mandelson-Starmer loyalists could be selected as candidates. He has previously been known to stalk the offices of Labour politicians, "striking the fear of death into MPs", according to a party staffer. But Starmer's grip on the reins of power is slipping. And now, after the events of the weekend, even McSweeney can't save him.

The third link in McSweeney's "inner circle" is Matt Pound. Pound was instrumental in Labour Party leadership rule changes that helped Starmer rise to power. He was previously head of the Labour First group, working to ensure the success of McSweeney-favoured candidates in "internal elections". Pound has previously been photographed alongside Marlon Solomon and Luke Akehurst, with the three wearing matching t-shirts bearing the phrase "Zionist Shitlord".

In 2019-20, Solomon was given £11,877 by the Pears Family Charitable Foundation to put on an Edinburgh Fringe show that would "put a comic spin on antisemitism". In 2008, the Pears Foundation established the Britain-Israel Research and Academic Exchange Partnership, "a major initiative launched by the prime ministers of both countries". In 2010, they helped establish the UK-Israel Life Sciences Council. David Chinn attended the launch.

David Chinn is the eldest son of life-long pro-Israeli lobbyist Trevor Chinn. Trevor Chinn was a co-director and major funder of McSweeney's Labour Together Limited. When McSweeney was found to have concealed over £730,000 in donations to Labour Together, he said it was "to protect Trevor Chinn, Labour Together's great benefactor".

Pulling in the money

The McSweeney-Starmer takeover of the Labour Party still needed cash, and Waheed Alli was on hand to provide. Alli was Starmer's biggest personal donor, giving over £30k for the prime minister's clothing and glasses. Now, his name appears in the Epstein Files.

Alli's name appears on a list of guests due to attend an Epstein-hosted dinner in February 2010 and another dinner in August of the same year. In another leaked e-mail from 2012, Epstein tells a friend that Peter Mandelson and Alli are staying at "Shelter Island".

McSweeney enforcer Faulding was working for Alli in the run-up to the general election in 2024. According to the former Labour frontbencher who contacted me, McSweeney's inner circle:

had lists of people approved or pressured before a selection ever began.

He believes that Faulding, however, soon fell out of favour:

his lack of charm leading to complaints about his arrogant out of control behaviour. He was becoming a liability to Morgan.

The problem is, McSweeney has himself become a liability to Supreme Leader Starmer. My source added:

The thugs beneath him are minions who any good leader would dispose of right away.

One of those who rushed to the by-then-doomed McSweeney's defence was Adam Langleben, current head of Labour Party think tank Progress and former national secretary of the Jewish Labour Movement.

The Zionist link

Langleben has previously supported Ivor Caplin, the former Labour minister caught by "paedophile hunters" last year. He has also described ex-Labour MP Greville Janner as his "inspiration". Back in 2021, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse said police deliberately "shut down" investigations into Janner. In 1997, just weeks after his election, Tony Blair gave Janner a peerage.

In The Lobby documentary produced by Al Jazeera, Rose, a director of the Jewish Labour Movement who previously worked at the Israeli embassy, was caught boasting about participating in IDF-developed Krav Maga training. Rose served as a Labour councillor in Barnet alongside Velleman.

In January, former Labour councillor Velleman pleaded guilty to a series of sexual offences against a police decoy he thought was a 13-year-old girl. Velleman sent naked pictures of himself to the 'girl' and asked whether she "was a virgin" and "at home alone". Then, on 10 February, Velleman admitted further charges, including sending the "child" videos of his penis and asking to see her underwear.

More

Unbelievably, Velleman had given evidence at the committee stage of the government's Child Safety Bill in 2022, where he's listed as a political organiser for Hope not Hate. Labour minister Peter Kyle, who was technology secretary when the Bill came into force, previously apologised to those:

let down by governments failing to keep them safe from toxic online content.

He also happens to be best friends with Ivor Caplin, the former Labour minister caught by "paedophile hunters" in 2025, and whose X account was still followed by Labour frontbenchers including Rachel Reeves whilst replete with a stream of explicit material. Caplin has "congratulated" Velleman online on several occasions, whilst Kyle once sent him a message of thanks at 2 o'clock in the morning!

On 9 February, Jewish News, apparently not reading the room, wrote a gushing piece extolling the virtues of political genius McSweeney, who by my research has only stood for public office himself once, receiving 149 votes in a Sutton West council election. McSweeney of course lived on an Israeli "kibbutz" shortly before joining the Labour Party and has a long history of promoting Israel lobby-backed candidates.

Langleben is quoted as saying:

No one did more to drag the Labour Party out of the darkest moment in its history than Morgan McSweeney. The Jewish community owes him a debt of gratitude.

Words of praise also effused from Michael Rubin, the director of Labour Friends of Israel, a shadowy lobby group within the party which refuses to reveal its funders. He said:

Morgan was essential in dragging Labour back to sanity after the dark Corbyn years.

The adults are not back

Some people might have an issue with the description of appointing Mandelson, the "best pal" of a notorious paedophile, to a top diplomatic role, as "sanity". If this is "the adults back in the room", it's not a room I want to set foot in.

Krav Maga-trained Ella Rose opined:

A lot will be written and said about the role of Morgan McSweeney…We would not have been fit for government without him. Thank you, Morgan.

One thing is true: by accepting the resignation of McSweeney, Starmer lost the final card in his deck. On Monday, the prime minister told his fast diminishing staff at No. 10 that he is "not resigning", but his removal is now simply a matter of time.

Featured image via the Canary

By Jody McIntyre

Why serve up tough HTML when you can offer tasty Markdown?

Cloudflare has turned its attention from erecting bot barriers to dangling bot bait.…

Gartner says using AI to fix customer gripes could cost more than using humans by 2030

ai-pocalypse AI will not replace the people in the call center, but it will rejigger the software stack to make agents more capable of solving customer issues without the need to swivel-chair into multiple systems or escalate complaints, said Vasili Triant, CEO of UJET.…

During its State of Play livestream on Thursday, Sony revealed the first PlayStation Plus Game Catalog addition for February and it's a doozy. Marvel's Spider-Man 2 (PS5) will finally websling its way onto the Game Catalog on February 17.

Marvel's Spider-Man 2 was released in October 2023, and Insomniac's third Spidey game is the the best of the bunch. You can play as both Peter Parker and his protégé Miles Morales. Each Spidey has his own skill tree and moveset to master.

Traversing New York (with a lot more of it explorable than in previous entries) has never felt better thanks to the addition of the wingsuit, while the set pieces are frequently breathtaking. Marvel's Spider-Man 2 remains one of the PS5's flagship games, and with Marvel's Spider-Man: Remastered and Miles Morales already on the Game Catalog, Extra and Premium subscribers can now play the whole series while they wait for Insomniac's Wolverine game to arrive later this year.

Sony later revealed the full PS Plus Game Catalog lineup for February on the PlayStation Blog. It includes Neva (PS4 and PS5), a stunning 2D platformer that's pretty much an interactive fairytale. Engadget's Jessica Conditt opened her review of the game by saying she had "absolutely nothing negative to say" about it, which is surely about as effusive as a recommendation can get. (A paid expansion that acts as a prequel is on the way next week too.)

The other titles coming to the PS Plus Game Catalog on February 17 are:

• Test Drive Unlimited Solar Crown (PS5)

• Season: A Letter to the Future (PS4 and PS5)

• Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin (PS4)

• Monster Hunter Stories (PS4)

• Venba (PS5)

• Echoes of the End: Enhanced Edition (PS5)

• Rugby 25 (PS4 and PS5)

PS Plus Premium members will have an extra game to play on PS4 and PS5 in the form of Disney Pixar Wall-E. This version was originally released in 2008 for the PlayStation 2.

Looking further ahead, Tekken Dark Resurrection will be available to Premium subscribers in March. Premium members will be able to play the original Time Crisis on their PS5 with gyro controls in May, which sounds fun. Also, Big Walk, a multiplayer game from Untitled Goose Game developer House House, will be available on all three PS Plus tiers when it debuts later this year.

Update February 12, 6:43PM ET: Added the full list of PS Plus Game Catalog titles for February.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/playstation/the-ps-plus-game-catalog-additions-for-february-include-marvels-spider-man-2-232459779.html?src=rss

Last year marked 20 years since God of War hit the PlayStation 2 and kicked off one of gaming biggest franchises. Now, at the tail end of that 20th anniversary celebration, Sony's Santa Monica Studio has announced two new project. First, and most significantly, the original God of War trilogy from the PS2 and PS3 is being remade for the modern era.

There's no footage of it yet — the developer says that they're "very early in development," so we likely won't see or hear much about this for a while. But given renewed interest in God of War thanks to the excellent two Norse games from 2018 and 2022 (not to mention the upcoming Amazon series), it makes sense to revisit these classics.

God of War and God of War II were released for Playstation 2 in 2005 and 2007, respectively, while the third of the Greek trilogy hit PlayStation 3 in 2010. The third game was also remastered for the PS4. But it's safe to say that while the first two games are classics for their era, they also really show their age in some gameplay spots. Hopefully the remake will smooth out those rough edges. (Who else has nightmares in the Hades level near the end of the first game? Not just me, right?)

While we won't see the remakes for a while, there is a new God of War-inspired game out right now: God of War Sons of Sparta. It was developed by Mega Cat Studios, a developer known for its love of retro games — it even still releases games for the SNES and Genesis.

Given their pedigree, it's no surprise that Sons of Sparta has vibes of classic 2D action/platformer games. It's apparently canon for the series and takes place in Kratos' youth while he trains with his brother. It obviously looks nothing like the other God of War games — but the combat and monsters shown off in the trailer definitely feel right at home in the series.

Perhaps the most fun part of all this is that it's available today for $30. While Sons of Sparta looks like a fun curio for God of War fans, it'll only go so far towards whetting our appetite for that remake series. Might I suggest binging some Valhalla in the meantime?

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/playstation/god-of-war-is-getting-a-remake-trilogy-and-a-new-retro-inspired-action-game-is-out-today-234056618.html?src=rss

Coming off the success of Slient Hill f, which moved the series' psychological horror to the Japanese countryside, Konami, Annapurna Interactive and developer Screen Burn Interactive have chosen a foggy island as the setting for Silent Hill: Townfall.

The first gameplay trailer for Townfall, introduced during Sony's latest State of Play, follows Simon Ordell, a man who keeps mysteriously waking up in the water off the coast of the empty island town of St. Amelia. In the trailer, Simon hides from monsters, peers at a portable television, swings a fire axe, and deals with the psychological turmoil typical of a Silent Hill protagonist, all in first person, one of the unique twists of this new game.

Silent Hill: Townfall was originally announced alongside Silent Hill f and the remake of Silent Hill 2 in 2022. The game is developed by Screen Burn Interactive (formerly known as No Code), the creators of Observation and Stories Untold. Konami will share more details about Townfall's gameplay and story in an upcoming Silent Hill Transmission presentation later today.

Silent Hill: Townfall is coming to PlayStation 5 in 2026.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/playstation/silent-hill-townfall-takes-the-series-trademark-fog-to-an-eerie-coastal-community-233324897.html?src=rss

Volume two of the Metal Gear Solid: Master Collection will arrive on August 27, publisher Konami announced today during Sony's latest State of Play presentation. The bundle will feature 2008's Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, the HD remaster of 2010's Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker and a selection of bonus content, including Metal Gear: Ghost Babel, which was originally released for Game Boy Color in 2000. All told, that's a smaller selection of games than Konami made available with Vol. 1 of the Master Collection, but Metal Gear fans will be excited nonetheless, if only for the fact it will mark the first time MGS4 will be officially playable on a platform other than the PlayStation 3.

That it has taken Konami nearly two decades to release the conclusion of Solid Snake's story on more systems has to do with the nature of the game as a PS3 exclusive. MGS4 took extensive advantage of the console's unique Cell architecture, a fact that made it difficult (and expensive) proposition to port to more recent x86-based systems. In recent years, it's been possible to emulate the game on a powerful PC, but not everyone has that kind of hardware.

Metal Gear Solid: Master Collection Vol.2 will be available on PS5. For now, Konami has not announced other platform availability, but the previous instalment was also available on PC, Nintendo Switch and Xbox.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/playstation/the-next-metal-gear-solid-remaster-collection-arrives-this-summer-231711005.html?src=rss

It's been less than three months since we got our first look at Control Resonant, the sequel to Remedy's mind-bending, third-person adventure that introduced us to Jesse Faden and the Federal Bureau of Control. At today's State of Play event, we got to see the first extended bit of gameplay from Control Resonant — and the combat looks as inspired as ever, though the setting is completely new.

As we learned in December, the next Control games doesn't focus on Jesse Faden; instead, you'll primarily play as her brother Dylan who Jesse was trying to find for much of the first game. Dylan's out in a warped version of New York City trying to track the game's Resonant creatures that are responsible for whatever calamity has taken place. We knew this already, but the change of setting from the Bureau of Control building into the more open city setting should go a long way towards making this game feel fresh.

Dylan's capabilities are also completely different than what we saw from Jesse in the original. There's a much bigger emphasis on melee combat, as Dylan has a shapeshifting weapon called the Aberrant. You can switch from hammer to blades to other various forms, much in the way that Jesse's firearm in the first game could morph between different types of guns.

But the thing that stood out the most to me in the brief preview was the way that NYC completely disobeyed the laws of physics. Buildings and streets would just head into the sky at 90-degree angles — and Dylan's powers let him completely which surface is the "ground" for him.

There's still no firm release date for Control Resonant, but that's not unreasonable — the game was only announced a few months ago. Remedy says they're still on target to launch in 2026. And, at the end of today's PlayStation blog post, they promise that "things are going to get weirder." Just what I was hoping for!

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/playstation/the-first-control-resonant-gameplay-trailer-shows-dylan-defying-physics-in-a-sideways-nyc-224746545.html?src=rss

Are you a good bot or a bad bot?

More than 30 malicious Chrome extensions installed by at least 260,000 users purport to be helpful AI assistants, but they steal users' API keys, email messages, and other personal data. Even worse: many of these are still available on the Chrome Web Store as of this writing.…

Sony's first State of Play stream of the year included an update on Mina the Hollower, the latest title from Shovel Knight studio Yacht Club Games. It's now slated to arrive sometime this spring. The developer initially planned to release the retro-style action-adventure platformer on Halloween last year, but delayed it to "to apply some final polish and balancing to make the game truly shine."

While Mina the Hollower didn't make its original Halloween release date, at least the new demo, which will be available for a limited time, is getting a eerily timed debut. It'll hit PS5 tomorrow i.e. Friday, February 13. Y'know… Friday the 13th?

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/playstation/mina-the-hollower-resurfaces-with-a-spring-2026-release-window-224327165.html?src=rss

When it launched in 2021, Kena: Bridge of Spirits was an early example of the graphical power of the PS5 thanks to its Pixar-adjacent animation and over-the-top effects. Based on a surprise trailer at Sony's latest State of Play, it seems like its sequel, Kena: Scars of Kosmora, could up the ante when it launches later this year.

Scars of Kosmora follows spirit guide Kena to a mysterious island called Kosmora, where a powerful spirit breaks her staff and forces her to embrace a new style of spirit guiding (and presumably a collection of new game mechanics). Like the first game, Scars of Kosmora looks to be filled with lush visuals and cute Spirit Companions, but also a surprising amount of boss battles. Developer Ember Lab's new trailer heavily emphasizes the game's updated combat, which seems like it'll play a big role in the sequel.

According to a post on the PlayStation Blog, it sounds like manipulating the elements will also be a major focus. "We've added new elemental gameplay to bring strategy and depth when facing the threats of Kosmora," developer Ember Lab says. "These new combat skills, elemental infusions and use of your Spirit Companions will be key to overcoming challenging encounters and epic boss fights."

Kena: Scars of Kosmora is coming to PlayStation 5 and PC in 2026.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/playstation/kena-scars-of-kosmora-is-coming-out-later-this-year-224006963.html?src=rss

Ghost of Yotei's forthcoming Legends multiplayer expansion will arrive early next month, Sony announced today during its latest State of Play presentation. As in Ghost of Tsushima, you'll be able to play the mode with up to three other people online. Players can each choose from one of four classes — samurai, archer, mercenary and shinobi — who excel in different combat scenarios. All four classes can wield a katana and bow, but then they also have access to special weapons and skills. For example, the samurai can wield the odachi, giving them a sweeping move set against groups of enemies. You'll need to use teamwork and your class's abilities to take down demonic versions of the Yotei Six.

The mode will arrive alongside the game's 1.5 patch, and will be free for all Ghost of Yotei owners. At launch, players can look forward to three different mission types. In survival, you'll be tasked with fighting off increasingly difficult enemies. In story mode, meanwhile, you and one other player will need to complete a series of 12 missions to unlock the expansion's incursion mode, which will see you siege a fortress belonging to a member of Yotei Six. At first, there will be four strongholds for players to conquer, with a later April patch adding the final bosses.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/playstation/ghost-of-yoteis-multiplayer-expansion-arrives-march-10-223842684.html?src=rss

For thirty years, internet users have benefited from a key federal law that allows everyone to express themselves, find community, organize politically, and participate in society. Section 230, which protects internet users' speech by protecting the online intermediaries we rely on, is the legal support that sustains the internet as we know it.

Yet as Section 230 turns 30 this week, there are bipartisan proposals in Congress to either repeal or sunset the law. These proposals seize upon legitimate concerns with the harmful and anti-competitive practices of the largest tech companies, but then misdirect that anger toward Section 230.

But rolling back or eliminating Section 230 will not stop invasive corporate surveillance that harms all internet users. Killing Section 230 won't end the dominance of the current handful of large tech companies—it would cement their monopoly power. 

The current proposals also ignore a crucial question: what legal standard should replace Section 230? The bills provide no answer, refusing to grapple with the tradeoffs inherent in making online intermediaries liable for users' speech.

This glaring omission shows what these proposals really are: grievances masquerading as legislation, not serious policy. Especially when the speech problems with alternatives to Section 230's immunity are readily apparent, both in the U.S. and around the world. Experience shows that those systems result in more censorship of internet users' lawful speech.

Let's be clear: EFF defends Section 230 because it is the best available system to protect users' speech online. By immunizing intermediaries for their users' speech, Section 230 benefits users. Services can distribute our speech without filters, pre-clearance, or the threat of dubious takedown requests. Section 230 also directly protects internet users when they distribute other people's speech online, such as when they reshare another users' post or host a comment section on their blog.

It was the danger of losing the internet as a forum for diverse political discourse and culture that led to the law in 1996. Congress created Section 230's limited civil immunity because it recognized that promoting more user speech outweighed potential harms. Congress decided that when harmful speech occurs, it's the speaker that should be held responsible—not the service that hosts the speech. The law also protects social platforms when they remove posts that are obscene or violate the services' own standards. And Section 230 has limits: it does not immunize services if they violate federal criminal laws.

Section 230 Alternatives Would Protect Less Speech

With so much debate around the downsides of Section 230, it's worth considering: What are some of the alternatives to immunity, and how would they shape the internet?

The least protective legal regime for online speech would be strict liability. Here, intermediaries always would be liable for their users' speech—regardless of whether they contributed to the harm, or even knew about the harmful speech. It would likely end the widespread availability and openness of social media and web hosting services we're used to. Instead, services would not let users speak without vetting the content first, via upload filters or other means. Small intermediaries with niche communities may simply disappear under the weight of such heavy liability.

Another alternative: Imposing legal duties on intermediaries, such as requiring that they act "reasonably" to limit harmful user content. This would likely result in platforms monitoring users' speech before distributing it, and being extremely cautious about what they allow users to say. That inevitably would lead to the removal of lawful speech—probably on a large scale. Intermediaries would not be willing to defend their users' speech in court, even it is entirely lawful. In a world where any service could be easily sued over user speech, only the biggest services will survive. They're the ones that would have the legal and technical resources to weather the flood of lawsuits.

Another option is a notice-and-takedown regime, like what exists under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. That will also result in takedowns of legitimate speech. And there's no doubt such a system will be abused. EFF has documented how the DMCA leads to widespread removal of lawful speech based on frivolous copyright infringement claims. Replacing Section 230 with a takedown system will invite similar behavior, and powerful figures and government officials will use it to silence their critics.

The closest alternative to Section 230's immunity provides protections from liability until an impartial court has issued a full and final ruling that user-generated content is illegal, and ordered that it be removed. These systems ensure that intermediaries will not have to cave to frivolous claims. But they still leave open the potential for censorship because intermediaries are unlikely to fight every lawsuit that seeks to remove lawful speech. The cost of vindicating lawful speech in court may be too high for intermediaries to handle at scale.

By contrast, immunity takes the variable of whether an intermediary will stand up for their users' speech out of the equation. That is why Section 230 maximizes the ability for users to speak online.

In some narrow situations, Section 230 may leave victims without a legal remedy. Proposals aimed at those gaps should be considered, though lawmakers should pay careful attention that in vindicating victims, they do not broadly censor users' speech. But those legitimate concerns are not the criticisms that Congress is levying against Section 230.

EFF will continue to fight for Section 230, as it remains the best available system to protect everyone's ability to speak online.

Reposted from EFF's Deeplinks blog.

Yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared before the House Judiciary Committee. Among the more notable exchanges was when Rep. Pramila Jayapal asked some of Jeffrey Epstein's victims who were in the audience to stand up and indicate whether Bondi's DOJ had ever contacted them about their experiences. None of them had heard from the Justice Department. Bondi wouldn't even look at the victims as she frantically flipped through her prepared notes.

And that's when news organizations, including Reuters, caught something alarming: one of the pages Bondi held up clearly showed searches that Jayapal herself had done of the Epstein files:

A Reuters photographer captured this image of a page from Pam Bondi's "burn book," which she used to counter any questions from Democratic lawmakers during an unhinged hearing today.It looks like the DOJ monitored members of Congress's searches of the unredacted Epstein files.Just wow.

— Christopher Wiggins (@cwnewser.bsky.social) 2026-02-11T23:06:45.578Z

The Department of Justice—led by an Attorney General who is supposed to serve the public but has made clear her only role is protecting Donald Trump's personal interests—is actively surveilling what members of Congress are searching in the Epstein files. And then bringing that surveillance data to a congressional hearing to use as political ammunition.

This should be front-page news. It should be a major scandal. Honestly, it should be impeachable.

There is no legitimate investigative purpose here. No subpoena. Nothing at all. Just the executive branch tracking the oversight activities of the legislative branch, then weaponizing that information for political culture war point-scoring. The DOJ has no business whatsoever surveilling what members of Congress—who have oversight authority over the Justice Department—are searching.

Jayapal is rightly furious:

Pam Bondi brought a document to the Judiciary Committee today that had my search history of the Epstein files on it. The DOJ is spying on members of Congress. It's a disgrace and I won't stand for it.

— Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (@jayapal.house.gov) 2026-02-12T01:14:57.174494904Z

We've been here before. Way back in 2014, the CIA illegally spied on searches by Senate staffers who were investigating the CIA's torture program. It was considered a scandal at the time—because it was one. The executive branch surveilling congressional oversight is a fundamental violation of separation of powers. It's the kind of thing that, when it happens, should trigger immediate consequences.

And yet.

Just a few days ago, Senator Lindsey Graham—who has been one of the foremost defenders of government surveillance for years—blew up at a Verizon executive for complying with a subpoena that revealed Graham's call records (not the contents, just the metadata) from around January 6th, 2021.

"If the shoe were on the other foot, it'd be front-page news all over the world that Republicans went after sitting Democratic senators' phone records," said Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who was among the Republicans in Congress whose records were accessed by prosecutors as they examined contacts between the president and allies on Capitol Hill.

"I just want to let you know," he added, "I don't think I deserve what happened to me."

This is the same Lindsey Graham who, over a decade ago, said he was "glad" that the NSA was collecting his phone records because it magically kept him safe from terrorists. But now he's demanding hundreds of thousands of dollars for being "spied" on (he wasn't—a company complied with a valid subpoena in a legitimate investigation, which is how the legal system is supposed to work).

So here's the contrast: Graham is demanding money and media attention because a company followed the law. Meanwhile, the Attorney General is actually surveilling a Democratic member of Congress's oversight activities—with no legal basis whatsoever—and using that surveillance for political theater in a manner clearly designed as a warning shot to congressional reps investigating the Epstein Files. Pam Bondi wants you to know she's watching you.

Graham claimed that if the shoe were on the other foot, it would be "front-page news all over the world." Well, Senator, here's your chance. The shoe is very much on the other foot. It's worse than what happened to you, because what happened to you was legal and appropriate, and what's happening to Jayapal is neither.

But we all know Graham won't speak out against this administration. He's had nearly a decade to show whether or not the version of Lindsey Graham who said "if we elected Donald Trump, we will get destroyed… and we will deserve it" still exists, and it's clear that Lindsey Graham is long gone. This one only serves Donald Trump and himself, not the American people.

But this actually matters: if the DOJ can surveil what members of Congress search in oversight files—and then use that surveillance as a weapon in public hearings—congressional oversight of the executive branch is dead. That's the whole point of separation of powers. The people who are supposed to watch the watchmen can't do their jobs if the watchmen are surveilling them.

And remember: Bondi didn't hide this. She brought it to the hearing. She held it up when she knew cameras would catch what was going on. She wanted Jayapal—and every other member of Congress—to see exactly what she's doing.

This administration doesn't fear consequences for this kind of vast abuse of power because there haven't been any. And the longer that remains true, the worse it's going to get.

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark may be a mouthfull, but it's certainly fast at 1,000 Tok/s running on Nvidia rival's CS3 accelerators

Nvidia and AMD can take a seat. On Thursday, OpenAI unveiled GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark, its first model that will run on Cerebras Systems' dinner-place-sized AI accelerators, which feature some of the world's fastest on-chip memory.…

The fate of the 2,787 people arrested for terrorism offences for peacefully holding signs saying "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action" in silent vigils in towns and cities in all four nations of the UK, will be decided on Friday 13 February at 10am in Court 4 of the Royal Courts of Justice when the long-awaited Judicial Review ruling will be finally read into court.

Outside the court, supporters of the Lift The Ban campaign will again risk arrest by holding the same signs in a display of the ongoing defiance of the government's authoritarian attempt to treat protest as terrorism. The Lift The Ban campaign - which aims to de-proscribe Palestine Action and end government complicity in genocide - has become the largest UK-wide campaign of nonviolent civil disobedience in recent history.

A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said:

The Filton 6 verdicts show that only a Judicial Review ruling that strikes down the Palestine Action ban as unlawful will be in tune with the public's understanding of justice. Unlike the government, the public knows the difference between protest and terrorism.

The Filton 6 verdicts have been a huge blow to government ministers who have tried to portray Palestine Action as a violent group. They have repeatedly referred to the single incidence of alleged harm to an individual in the case as justification for banning Palestine Action before the allegation was proven in court.

Yet Palestine Action never advocated causing harm to people and never caused unlawful violence to a person in over 400 actions. Their aim was always to save lives by causing damage to companies like Elbit Systems whose made-in-Britain quadcopter drones have been killing innocent civilians in Gaza.

Our action outside the Royal Courts of Justice will create yet another dilemma for the police - will they arrest us as the result of the Judicial Review is being read out? If the appeal against the proscription is successful, their action looks ridiculous.

If it is unsuccessful, more people will be added to the queue for prosecution in the courts - and people of conscience who want to defend our fundamental rights and freedoms will have no option but to continue to resist this unjust, unnecessary and unenforceable law.

Lobbyists for proscription

As the Channel 4 documentary Palestine Action - The Truth Behind The Ban showed, home secretary Yvette Cooper held meetings with lobbyists for arms companies and Israel that were revealed by Freedom of Information requests. Even the government's own adviser on terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall KC, condemned Cooper's "nudge, nudge, wink, wink" approach to justifying the ban.

We also know about pressure from arms companies and lobbyists for Israel that was put on the government, and that in March 2025 Keir Starmer took two phone calls from Donald Trump about Palestine Action after the group painted "Gaza is not for sale" on Trump's golf course in Scotland.

The decision was made despite warnings that the move would backfire, and despite deep and widespread concerns amongst civil servants, international experts, human rights observers and civil society.

Impacts of the proscription

The decision to proscribe has not only led to 2,787 people being arrested for sitting peacefully, holding signs in front of the world's press. It has also resulted in the the misapplication of counter-terror resources, international condemnation, the exhaustion and lowering of morale of police officers and the possibility that people might be criminalised for showing support for the Palestinian people.

But it has not stopped people taking direct action against the properties of the companies who are complicit in genocide.

The judicial review grounds

Huda Ammori was granted four grounds on which to challenge the proscription in a judicial review which was heard at the Royal Courts of Justice over three days between 26 November and 2 December 2025.

On 30 July 2025 Mr Justice Chamberlain granted two grounds: that the proscription was a disproportionate interference with Article 10 and Article 11 rights Convention Rights, namely the rights to expression and assembly; and that Palestine Action should have been consulted.

Two additional grounds were granted by the Court of Appeal on 17 October 2025: that the home secretary failed to have regard to domestic public law principles and that she did not apply her own policy including the proportionality of the proscription.

Allegations of a judicial stitch-up

Avaaz launched a petition demanding an explanation from justice secretary David Lammy MP as to why the judge overseeing the case was removed just days before it was about to begin. The lack of an explanation has meant the Judicial Review has been dogged by allegations of a 'stitch-up' with questions about the suitability and independence of the three replacement judges demanding to be answered. A former British ambassador suggested the result had been to "load the dice for Israel".

The judicial review

On the opening day of the Judicial Review, Raza Husain KC, representing Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori, noted that the group was the: "first direct-action civil disobedience organisation that does not advocate for violence ever to be proscribed as terrorist." He said the ban was an "ill-considered, discriminatory, due process-lacking, authoritarian abuse of statutory power … that is alien to the basic tradition of common law and the European Convention on Human Rights."

Defend Our Juries' Lift The Ban campaign was cited as evidence of mass civil society disagreement with the proscription.

Intervening in the Judicial Review, United Nations Special Rapporteur Ben Saul warned the ban makes the UK "out of step with comparable liberal democracies" and "sets a precedent" for further crackdown on other protest movements in the UK such as climate protesters.

Amnesty International UK said it represented a substantial departure from established responses to protest movements which use direct action tactics and that it breached our fundamental rights to protest and free speech.

Liberty argued the ban was disproportionate because counter-terror powers have historically been directed at groups whose modus operandi includes intentional violence against people

Best-selling author Sally Rooney told the hearing how she may no longer be able to sell or publish her books in the UK due to her support for Palestine Action.

On the final day of the Judicial Review - Tuesday 2 December 2025 -  the government presented part of its defence using the secret court system known as Closed Material Procedure. This method has come under criticism for allowing evidence to be presented without challenge and has been described by Angus McCullough KC as being a system "in meltdown".

Government would have let hunger strikers die

During a rolling hunger and thirst strike running from November to January, Lammy refused to meet lawyers for the families and loved ones of hunger strikers, or even to reply directly to the several letters that they sent. This was despite warnings from medical professionals that participants had passed the point where there was a high risk of death and serious permanent injury.

UN experts said any death and injury would be the government's responsibility:

The State's duty of care toward hunger strikers is heightened, not diminished … Preventable deaths in custody are never acceptable. The State bears full responsibility for the lives and wellbeing of those it detains.

The conditions of Palestine Action-connected prisoners held without trial were earlier criticised by the UN in a letter to the UK government.

Government complicity in crimes against humanity and genocide

Evidence of UK complicity in crimes against genocide continues to mount. In October 2025 the UN issued its draft report Gaza Genocide: A Collective Crime detailing the complicity of states including the UK in the destruction of Gaza. Amongst other things, the UK continued to supply arms including components for F-35 stealth bombers, undertook daily surveillance flights over Gaza for Israel, maintained normal trade relations, and allowed Israel to undertake international crimes with impunity.

In December Declassified UK released its film Britain's Gaza Spy Flight Scandal, investigating the hundreds of RAF intelligence flights conducted on behalf of Israel.

The genocide continues but the government is silent

The genocide continues to unfold in Gaza. Since the 11 October 2025 "ceasefire", Israel has killed at least 556 Palestinians in Gaza and wounded 1,500. The total recorded death toll since 7 October 2023 is now 71,824.

In October 2025 the UN reported that 81% of buildings in Gaza had been either damaged or destroyed rendering the vast majority of the population homeless and relying on temporary shelters. Israel continues to destroy buildings in Gaza.

Israel recently banned 37 aid groups from working in Gaza. UN experts said:

Banning life-saving organisations from operating in Gaza marks a new phase in a policy that renders life unbearable for a population already devastated by genocide. This strategy will create conditions that force Palestinians into chronic deprivation, threatening their very survival as a group and further violating the Genocide Convention - it must be stopped …

We have entered a new phase in which Israel and its supporters have reached the genocide without witness stage. With journalists being killed, denied access, or forced out, humanitarian organisations paralysed or expelled, and a misleading global sense of 'ceasefire', atrocities are being committed without public scrutiny.

Featured image via Defend our Juries

By The Canary

And hey, maybe the overseas remote operators senators fret about won't be needed quite so often

Waymo is rolling out its sixth-generation autonomous driving system, saying it's designed to avoid a repeat of past weather-related snafus. It's also causing controversy by putting the new kit on vehicles built by a Chinese automaker. …

In what is considered one of the most serious estimates since the outbreak of war in October 2023, the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights has suggested that Palestinian deaths in Gaza may have exceeded 200,000. The estimate is based on data indicating a population decline of more than 10% in recent months.

If confirmed, the figure would call into question current casualty estimates. It would also raise serious concerns about the gap between published statistics and the reality on the ground.

Gaza's population decline opens the door to shocking possibilities

Stuart Casey-Maslen, head of the Academy's International Humanitarian Law Focus Project, told Anadolu Agency that the recorded population decline could indicate the loss of around 200,000 people. He stressed that the figures announced so far "do not reflect the full extent of human losses."

He explained that the officially documented toll includes only bodies that have been found or registered. An unknown number of victims may remain under rubble or in inaccessible areas. He said

We will need time to know the exact number. But it is clear that we are facing a huge human loss, and it is necessary to know how these people were killed.

According to Gaza's Ministry of Health, documented deaths have reached 72,037, with more than 171,000 injured. The ministry notes that thousands of victims have not yet been recovered due to ongoing destruction and limited rescue access.

International report monitors Gaza among 23 armed conflicts

Maslen's comments were included in the Academy's War Watch report, which assessed Gaza and the West Bank alongside 23 other global conflicts over the past 18 months.

The report states that conditions in Gaza remain extremely dangerous. This is despite a decline in large-scale clashes compared to the most intense periods of fighting.

Maslen said the absence of widespread hostilities seen before last year's ceasefire "does not mean that the suffering of the population has ended." He stressed that people "are still dying in Gaza."

He added that wounded civilians in need of urgent evacuation face severe shortages of food, water, shelter, and healthcare. He called for a significant increase in humanitarian aid and guaranteed, unhindered access.

Exceptional destruction and years of reconstruction

Turning to reconstruction, Maslen described the scale of destruction as "exceptional." He said returning life to pre-October 2023 levels will take years, not months, and require billions of dollars in investment.

He emphasised that rebuilding critical infrastructure demands long-term international commitment. This must go beyond emergency relief to comprehensive development planning.

Legal characterisation and pending accountability

In legal terms, Maslen noted that the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry previously concluded that genocide had taken place in Gaza, though it did not specify a timeframe.

He also pointed out that in November 2024, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant. The charges relate to alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Maslen criticised sanctions imposed on several ICC judges in connection with those warrants. He argued that such measures undermine international justice rather than support it.

He concluded that the attacks carried out by Hamas on 7 October 2023 cannot justify the scale of human losses that followed. He called for genuine legal accountability for events over the past two years.

Between limited official figures and alarming population estimates, the situation in Gaza remains unresolved. The true scale of human loss may be far greater than current records suggest.

Featured image via Wafa News Agency

By Alaa Shamali