BoingBoing points to a website that auto-generates descriptions of imaginary pieces of Art based on the dataset of the Tate's catalogue metadata.
http://boingboing.net/2013/11/12/88-nonillion-imaginary-artwork.html
http://www.shardcore.org/cgi-bin/getArtwork.pl?id=18c_1d6_5e_1b_45_3b_1_2_1b_105_20b_147_e_3_15_
http://www.shardcore.org/shardpress/index.php/2013/11/06/tate-data-explorer/
http://www.shardcore.org/shardpress/index.php/2013/11/12/machine-imagined-artworks-2013/

Well, how very Borgesian! We can perhaps imagine the Museum of Babel; (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Library_of_Babel) viz. an enormous expanse of interlocking hexagonal rooms, each of which contains the bare necessities for human survival and one example of the universe of all possible art objects. Even though most of these look like a 3D model of a cat designed by Picasso, some say that every existing piece of art is curated somewhere within the museum. However if the museum is itself an Art, we must postulate the Museum of all possible Museums in a Cantor-ian redux. What troubled Russell and Whitehead and as Godel ratified, this leads us inexorably to the conclusion that all museums must contain Art that cannot be described using the system of artistic analysis implicit in their catalogues.